School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia; Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Sep;52(3):411-415. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 23.
We recently reported a high prevalence of Clostridium difficile in retail vegetables, compost and lawn in Western Australia. The objective of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility of previously isolated food and environmental C. difficile isolates from Western Australia. A total of 274 C. difficile isolates from vegetables, compost and lawn were tested for susceptibility to a panel of 10 antimicrobial agents (fidaxomicin, vancomycin, metronidazole, rifaximin, clindamycin, erythromycin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, moxifloxacin, meropenem and tetracycline) using the agar incorporation method. Fidaxomicin was the most potent agent (MIC/MIC, 0.06/0.12 mg/L). Resistance to fidaxomicin and metronidazole was not detected and resistance to vancomycin (0.7%) and moxifloxacin (0.7%) was low. However, 103 isolates (37.6%) showed resistance to at least one agent, and multidrug resistance was observed in 3.9% of the resistant isolates (4/103), all of which came from compost. A significantly greater proportion of compost isolates were resistant to clindamycin, erythromycin and tetracycline compared with food and/or lawn isolates. Clostridium difficile ribotype (RT) 014/020 showed greater clindamycin resistance than other less common RTs (P = 0.008, χ). Contaminated vegetables, compost and lawn could be playing an intermediary role in the transmission of C. difficile from animals to humans. Environmental strains of C. difficile could also function as a reservoir for antimicrobial resistance genes of clinical relevance. This study provides a baseline for future surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in environmental C. difficile isolates in Australia.
我们最近报道了西澳大利亚州零售蔬菜、堆肥和草坪中艰难梭菌的高流行率。本研究的目的是调查西澳大利亚州以前分离的食品和环境艰难梭菌分离株的抗菌药敏性。共检测了来自蔬菜、堆肥和草坪的 274 株艰难梭菌分离株,以确定它们对 10 种抗菌药物(非达霉素、万古霉素、甲硝唑、利福昔明、克林霉素、红霉素、阿莫西林/克拉维酸、莫西沙星、美罗培南和四环素)的敏感性,采用琼脂掺入法。非达霉素是最有效的药物(MIC/MIC,0.06/0.12 mg/L)。未检测到对非达霉素和甲硝唑的耐药性,对万古霉素(0.7%)和莫西沙星(0.7%)的耐药性较低。然而,有 103 株(37.6%)分离株至少对一种药物表现出耐药性,在耐药分离株中观察到 3.9%(4/103)的多重耐药,所有这些分离株均来自堆肥。与食物和/或草坪分离株相比,堆肥分离株对克林霉素、红霉素和四环素的耐药比例明显更高。艰难梭菌核糖体分型(RT)014/020 比其他不太常见的 RT 表现出更高的克林霉素耐药性(P = 0.008,χ )。受污染的蔬菜、堆肥和草坪可能在艰难梭菌从动物传播给人类的过程中发挥中介作用。艰难梭菌的环境株也可能成为具有临床相关性的抗菌耐药基因的储存库。本研究为澳大利亚未来对环境艰难梭菌分离株的抗菌耐药性监测提供了基线数据。