• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服分级挑战阿莫西林而无需事先皮试的安全性和结果。

Safety and Outcomes of Oral Graded Challenges to Amoxicillin without Prior Skin Testing.

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.

Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Jan;7(1):236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 May 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2018.05.008
PMID:29802906
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unconfirmed penicillin allergy poses substantial public health consequences. The most widely accepted protocol to evaluate penicillin allergy is skin testing followed by an amoxicillin challenge.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of direct oral graded challenges to amoxicillin.

METHODS

A prospective single-blind clinical trial with historical controls of patients ≥7 years old with historical non-life-threatening reactions to penicillin was conducted. Patients received placebo followed by a 2-step graded challenge to amoxicillin. The allergic reaction rate was compared with the rate observed in our previous study that included skin testing and with the currently reported penicillin allergy prevalence in the US population.

RESULTS

Of the 155 participants who completed an amoxicillin challenge, 120 patients (77.4%) experienced no reaction whereas 31 patients (20%) experienced nonallergic reactions to either placebo (n = 16) or amoxicillin (n = 15). Four patients (2.6%) developed mild allergic reactions. Significantly (P = .03) fewer patients (4 of 155, 2.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0%, 6.5%) were determined to be allergic compared with 14 of 170 subjects (8.2%, 95% CI: 5.0%, 13.4%) in our previous study where patients were determined to be allergic based on either positive skin tests (n = 11) or allergic challenge reactions after negative skin tests (n = 3). This 2.6% reaction rate was also significantly less than the 10% reported US prevalence of penicillin allergy (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Placebo-controlled oral graded challenges to amoxicillin without prior skin testing may be safe for patients ≥7 years old with non-life-threatening historical reactions to penicillin. Amoxicillin can be tolerated by the majority of patients with self-reported penicillin allergy.

摘要

背景

未经证实的青霉素过敏会产生严重的公共卫生后果。评估青霉素过敏最广泛接受的方案是皮肤测试,然后进行阿莫西林挑战。

目的

评估直接口服分级阿莫西林挑战的安全性。

方法

对≥7 岁、有非危及生命的青霉素过敏史的患者进行了一项前瞻性、单盲临床试验,并进行了历史对照。患者先接受安慰剂,然后进行两步分级阿莫西林挑战。将过敏反应率与我们之前的研究(包括皮肤测试)以及目前美国人群中报告的青霉素过敏流行率进行比较。

结果

在完成阿莫西林挑战的 155 名参与者中,120 名患者(77.4%)没有反应,31 名患者(20%)对安慰剂(n=16)或阿莫西林(n=15)有非过敏性反应。4 名患者(2.6%)出现轻度过敏反应。显著(P=0.03)较少的患者(155 例中有 4 例,2.6%,95%置信区间[CI]:1.0%,6.5%)被确定为过敏,而在我们之前的研究中,根据阳性皮肤测试(n=11)或阴性皮肤测试后过敏反应(n=3)确定过敏的 170 名患者中有 14 名(8.2%,95%CI:5.0%,13.4%)被确定为过敏。这一 2.6%的反应率也显著低于美国报告的 10%青霉素过敏流行率(P=0.003)。

结论

对于有非危及生命的青霉素过敏史的≥7 岁患者,在无皮试的情况下,进行安慰剂对照的口服分级阿莫西林挑战可能是安全的。大多数自我报告有青霉素过敏的患者可以耐受阿莫西林。

相似文献

1
Safety and Outcomes of Oral Graded Challenges to Amoxicillin without Prior Skin Testing.口服分级挑战阿莫西林而无需事先皮试的安全性和结果。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Jan;7(1):236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 May 23.
2
Skin testing and oral amoxicillin challenge in the outpatient allergy and clinical immunology clinic in pregnant women with penicillin allergy.在有青霉素过敏史的孕妇的门诊过敏和临床免疫学诊所中进行皮肤试验和口服阿莫西林激发试验。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Dec;125(6):646-651. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
3
Diagnosis of penicillin, amoxicillin, and cephalosporin allergy: reliability of examination assessed by skin testing and oral challenge.青霉素、阿莫西林和头孢菌素过敏的诊断:通过皮肤试验和口服激发试验评估检查的可靠性。
J Pediatr. 1998 Jan;132(1):137-43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70499-8.
4
Direct oral amoxicillin challenge without preliminary skin testing in adult patients with allergy and at low risk with reported penicillin allergy.在报告有青霉素过敏的成年过敏患者且低风险患者中,不进行初步皮肤试验直接口服阿莫西林激发试验。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Jan 1;40(1):57-61. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4184.
5
Skin testing and oral penicillin challenge in patients with a history of remote penicillin allergy.有青霉素远期过敏史患者的皮肤试验及口服青霉素激发试验
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Jan;100(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60402-4.
6
Identifying Allergic Drug Reactions Through Placebo-Controlled Graded Challenges.通过安慰剂对照分级激发试验识别药物过敏反应
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 May-Jun;5(3):711-717.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.09.041. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
7
Efficacy and Safety of 5-Day Challenge for the Evaluation of Nonsevere Amoxicillin Allergy in Children.5 日挑战评估儿童非重症阿莫西林过敏的疗效和安全性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Sep-Oct;6(5):1673-1680. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.01.030. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
8
Single-step direct drug provocation testing is safe for delabelling selected non-low-risk penicillin allergy labels.一步法直接药物激发试验可安全地用于去除选定的非低风险青霉素过敏标签。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Aug;127(2):232-235. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
9
Penicillin Allergy Evaluation: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label Evaluation of a Comprehensive Penicillin Skin Test Kit.青霉素过敏评估:一种全面的青霉素皮试试剂盒的前瞻性、多中心、开放性评估。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Jul-Aug;7(6):1876-1885.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.02.040. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
10
Comparing Direct Challenge to Penicillin Skin Testing for the Outpatient Evaluation of Penicillin Allergy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.直接挑战与青霉素皮试用于门诊青霉素过敏评估的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Sep-Oct;7(7):2163-2170. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.05.037. Epub 2019 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Unpacking Oral Challenge Protocols: A Descriptive Epidemiologic Study of Reactions, Predictors, and Practices for Delabeling Low-Risk Penicillin Allergies Leveraging Data from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.剖析口服激发试验方案:一项利用系统评价和荟萃分析数据对低风险青霉素过敏脱敏反应、预测因素及实践进行的描述性流行病学研究
Hosp Pharm. 2025 May 8:00185787251337626. doi: 10.1177/00185787251337626.
2
Narrative review of recent developments and the future of penicillin allergy de-labelling by non-allergists.非过敏症专科医生对青霉素过敏去标签化的最新进展及未来的叙述性综述。
NPJ Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Jul 10;2(1):18. doi: 10.1038/s44259-024-00035-6.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to delabel low-risk penicillin allergies with consideration for sex and gender.
一项关于去除低风险青霉素过敏标签干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析,并考虑了性别因素。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Mar;91(3):684-697. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16366. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
4
Effects of Sex and Gender in Immediate β-Lactam Antibiotic Allergy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.性别在即时β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2025 Jan;13(1):155-166.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.10.031. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
5
Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions aimed at delabeling low-risk penicillin allergies with consideration for sex and gender.针对考虑性别因素的旨在消除低危青霉素过敏标签的干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析议定书。
Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 14;13(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02671-5.
6
Risk Stratification of Penicillin Allergy Labeled Children: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan.青霉素过敏标记儿童的风险分层:一项来自约旦的横断面研究。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2024 Aug 22;20:505-514. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S464511. eCollection 2024.
7
Beta-lactam antibiotics administration among adult inpatients with a beta-lactam allergy label: incidence, predictors, and outcomes.在有β-内酰胺类过敏标签的成年住院患者中使用β-内酰胺类抗生素:发生率、预测因素及结局
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Apr 30;4(1):e68. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.68. eCollection 2024.
8
Penicillin Allergy Testing and Delabeling for Patients Who Are Prescribed Penicillin: A Systematic Review for a World Health Organization Guideline.青霉素过敏测试和标签去除在接受青霉素处方患者中的应用:世界卫生组织指南的系统评价。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2024 Apr;66(2):223-240. doi: 10.1007/s12016-024-08988-2. Epub 2024 May 2.
9
Beta-Lactam Allergy De-labeling in a Pediatric Hospital.儿科医院中的β-内酰胺类过敏去标签化
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Apr;29(2):169-174. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.169. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
10
Randomized Multicenter Trial for the Validation of an Easy-to-Administer Algorithm to Define Penicillin Allergy Status in Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic Outpatients.随机多中心试验,验证一种易于实施的算法,以确定性传播感染门诊患者的青霉素过敏状态。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 May 15;78(5):1131-1139. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae064.