Suppr超能文献

一步法直接药物激发试验可安全地用于去除选定的非低风险青霉素过敏标签。

Single-step direct drug provocation testing is safe for delabelling selected non-low-risk penicillin allergy labels.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Aug;127(2):232-235. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Penicillin allergy labels are prevalent, and removal of incorrect labels improves patient outcomes and health economics. Labels may be classified as "low-risk" or "non-low-risk," of which the symptoms of the latter chiefly suggest immunoglobulin E-mediated etiology. Traditionally, "non-low-risk" allergy labels are evaluated by penicillin skin testing followed by graded multistep penicillin drug provocation testing (DPT).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of assessing "non-low-risk" labels with single-step direct DPT.

METHODS

We consecutively enrolled inpatients and outpatients of a teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia, with penicillin allergy labels requiring penicillin for first-line treatment. Patients were classified as "low-risk" or "non-low-risk" based on the allergy labels. All patients proceeded directly to amoxicillin DPT, unless there was a history of anaphylaxis within 10 years of assessment to a beta-lactam (except for cefazolin) or Gell and Coombs type 2, type 3, or severe type 4 reaction. This was followed by a course of amoxicillin.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients (41 inpatients, 108 outpatients) were enrolled. No patient was excluded from the study. No patient experienced life-threatening reactions to the protocol. There were 85 patients who reported "non-low-risk" allergy labels. One patient developed generalized pruritus and rash that resolved with standard-dose antihistamines, 2 developed delayed benign maculopapular exanthem, and 3 experienced diarrhea during the course of amoxicillin.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, direct single-step DPT was safe, with only 6 patients with "non-low-risk" allergy experiencing benign reactions. We hope that further studies can be performed into single-step direct DPT to evaluate "non-low-risk" penicillin allergy labels.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: LNR/16/HAWKE/452.

摘要

背景

青霉素过敏标签普遍存在,去除不正确的标签可以改善患者的结局和健康经济学。这些标签可以分为“低风险”或“非低风险”,后者的主要症状表明是免疫球蛋白 E 介导的病因。传统上,“非低风险”过敏标签通过青霉素皮肤试验评估,然后进行分级多步青霉素药物激发试验(DPT)。

目的

评估单次直接 DPT 评估“非低风险”标签的安全性。

方法

我们连续招募了澳大利亚悉尼一所教学医院的住院和门诊患者,他们的青霉素过敏标签需要青霉素作为一线治疗。患者根据过敏标签分为“低风险”或“非低风险”。所有患者直接进行阿莫西林 DPT,除非在评估β-内酰胺(除头孢唑林外)或 Gell 和 Coombs 2 型、3 型或严重 4 型反应后 10 年内有过敏史发生过敏反应。随后给予阿莫西林疗程。

结果

共纳入 149 例患者(41 例住院患者,108 例门诊患者)。没有患者被排除在研究之外。没有患者对该方案发生危及生命的反应。有 85 例患者报告“非低风险”过敏标签。1 例患者出现全身性瘙痒和皮疹,用标准剂量抗组胺药缓解,2 例患者出现延迟性良性斑丘疹性皮疹,3 例患者在阿莫西林疗程中出现腹泻。

结论

在我们的队列中,直接单步 DPT 是安全的,只有 6 例“非低风险”过敏的患者出现良性反应。我们希望能进一步研究单步直接 DPT,以评估“非低风险”的青霉素过敏标签。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:LNR/16/HAWKE/452。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验