National Wine and Grape Industry Centre, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia; School of Agricultural and Wine Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, Australia; Australian Research Council-Training Centre for Innovative Wine Production, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
National Wine and Grape Industry Centre, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia; School of Agricultural and Wine Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, Australia; Australian Research Council-Training Centre for Innovative Wine Production, University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
Food Res Int. 2018 Jul;109:561-571. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.057. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
The aim of this study was to compare the volatile and sensory profiles of Australian Shiraz red wines produced by several methods to achieve alcohol concentrations of 10.5 and 13.5% v/v. These levels were considerably lower contents than the commercial wine (16-17% v/v) that was produced from this vineyard site. Wines were produced by: (i) harvest timing (19.3, 24 and 29.3 Brix); (ii) blending equal proportions of early harvest (19.3 Brix) and late harvest wines (29.3 Brix); and (iii) dealcoholization using reverse osmosis followed by a membrane contactor. Dealcoholization caused a significant loss of volatile compounds, particularly esters, while the blending treatment had an averaging effect on most analytes. Sensory descriptive analysis of treatments with 10.5% v/v alcohol showed that the perception of the herbaceous attribute was more intense in the early harvest wines in comparison to the dealcoholized wines, while those of dark fruit, raisin/prune, astringency and alcohol were lower. No sensory differences were found amongst the 13.5% v/v wines, except for alcohol. Sensory and compositional data were modelled by means of Common Dimension (ComDim) multi-block analysis and indicated which chemical components are important to the perceived wine sensory properties. Insights from this study will provide knowledge that may be applied to control or moderate both unripe sensory attributes in addition to a deficiency of ripe fruit aromas or mouthfeel characteristics in reduced-alcohol red wines.
本研究旨在比较几种方法生产的澳大利亚设拉子红葡萄酒的挥发性和感官特征,以达到 10.5%和 13.5%v/v 的酒精浓度。这些水平远低于该葡萄园生产的商业葡萄酒(16-17%v/v)。葡萄酒是通过以下方法生产的:(i)收获时间(19.3、24 和 29.3 布鲁克斯);(ii)以相同比例混合早期收获(19.3 布鲁克斯)和晚期收获葡萄酒(29.3 布鲁克斯);(iii)使用反渗透和膜接触器进行脱醇。脱醇处理会导致挥发性化合物(特别是酯类)大量损失,而混合处理对大多数分析物有平均效应。对 10.5%v/v 酒精处理的感官描述性分析表明,与脱醇酒相比,早期收获酒中草香特征的感知更为强烈,而深色水果、葡萄干/李子、涩味和酒精的感知则较低。除了酒精,13.5%v/v 葡萄酒之间没有发现感官差异。感官和成分数据通过共同维度(ComDim)多块分析进行建模,并指出哪些化学成分对感知到的葡萄酒感官特性很重要。本研究的结果将提供可能适用于控制或适度未成熟感官属性的知识,以及在低酒精红葡萄酒中缺乏成熟水果香气或口感特征的知识。