Haruki Yuto, Hagiya Hideharu, Haruki Mai, Sugiyama Tetsuhiro
Department of Pharmacy, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, 1756 Kawasaki, Tsuyama, Okayama, 708-0841, Japan.
Division of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka University Hospital, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
J Infect Chemother. 2018 Nov;24(11):944-947. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 May 24.
The number of patients infected with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms has increased dramatically worldwide, and high mortality rates are seen in severely ill patients. This study retrospectively compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of critically ill patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) at the Tsuyama Chuo Hospital (Okayama, Japan) who were hospitalized for bacteremia caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) or non-ESBL-producing E. coli (non-ESBL-EC) between January 2006 and December 2016 (11 years). We analyzed the patients' age, sex, underlying disease(s), sequential organ failure assessment scores, primary focus of bacteremia, empiric antibiotics, rate of appropriateness of empiric antibiotics, and treatment duration, with 28-day mortality being the primary outcome. The study included 24 patients with ESBL-EC bacteremia and 77 with non-ESBL-EC bacteremia. The rate of appropriate initial antibiotic treatment was significantly lower (54.2% vs. 96.1%, respectively; P < 0.01) and the mortality due to bacteremia significantly higher (37.5% vs. 15.6%, respectively; P = 0.04) in the ESBL-EC than in the non-ESBL-EC bacteremia group. A subgroup analysis focusing on patients who were administered appropriate empiric antibiotics showed that the 28-day mortality rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.23). To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the outcomes of patients with ESBL-EC and non-ESBL-EC bacteremia in a Japanese ICU setting. Initial empiric antibiotic therapy covering ESBL-producing pathogens should be considered for critically ill patients in the ICU.
在全球范围内,感染产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)微生物的患者数量急剧增加,重症患者的死亡率很高。本研究回顾性比较了2006年1月至2016年12月(11年)期间在日本冈山县津山中央医院重症监护病房(ICU)因产ESBL大肠埃希菌(ESBL-EC)或非产ESBL大肠埃希菌(非ESBL-EC)导致菌血症而住院的重症患者的临床特征和预后。我们分析了患者的年龄、性别、基础疾病、序贯器官衰竭评估评分、菌血症的主要病灶、经验性抗生素、经验性抗生素的恰当率以及治疗持续时间,以28天死亡率作为主要结局。该研究纳入了24例ESBL-EC菌血症患者和77例非ESBL-EC菌血症患者。ESBL-EC菌血症组初始抗生素治疗的恰当率显著低于非ESBL-EC菌血症组(分别为54.2%和96.1%;P<0.01),菌血症导致的死亡率显著高于非ESBL-EC菌血症组(分别为37.5%和15.6%;P=0.04)。一项针对接受恰当经验性抗生素治疗患者的亚组分析显示,两组的28天死亡率无显著差异(P=0.23)。据我们所知,这是第一项在日本ICU环境中比较ESBL-EC和非ESBL-EC菌血症患者预后的研究。对于ICU中的重症患者,应考虑初始经验性抗生素治疗覆盖产ESBL病原体。