University of Michigan School of Medicine, Department of Learning Health Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Gateway Health Plan, Pittsburgh, PA.
Diabetes Educ. 2018 Aug;44(4):373-382. doi: 10.1177/0145721718777855. Epub 2018 May 28.
Purpose The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a peer leader-led (PL) diabetes self-management support (DSMS) group in achieving and maintaining improvements in A1C, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), and diabetes distress in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes self-management support is critical; however, effective, sustainable support models are scarce. Methods The study was a cluster randomized controlled trial of 221 people with diabetes from 6 primary care practices. Practices and eligible participants (mean age: 63.0 years, 63.8% female, 96.8% white, 28.5% at or below poverty level, 32.5% using insulin, A1C ≥7%: 54.2%) were randomized to diabetes self-management education (DSME) + PL DSMS (n = 119) or to enhanced usual care (EUC) (DSME + traditional DSMS with no PL; n = 102). Data were collected at baseline, after DSME (6 weeks), after DSMS (6 months), and after telephonic DSMS (12 months). Results Decreases in A1C occurred between baseline and post-DSME in both groups. Both groups sustained improvements during DSMS, but A1C levels increased during telephonic DSMS. Improvements in self-monitoring of blood glucose were observed in both groups following DSME and were sustained throughout. At study end, the intervention group was 4.3 times less likely to have diabetes regimen-related distress compared to EUC. Conclusions PL DSMS is as effective as traditional DSMS in helping participants to maintain glycemic control and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and more effective at improving distress. With increasing diabetes prevalence and shortage of diabetes educators, it is important to integrate and use low-cost interventions in high-risk communities that build on available resources.
目的 本研究旨在评估同伴领导(PL)糖尿病自我管理支持(DSMS)小组在实现和维持糖尿病患者 A1C、自我血糖监测(SMBG)和糖尿病困扰改善方面的有效性。糖尿病自我管理支持至关重要;然而,有效的、可持续的支持模式却很少。
方法 该研究是一项针对 6 家初级保健机构的 221 名糖尿病患者的聚类随机对照试验。将实践和合格参与者(平均年龄:63.0 岁,63.8%为女性,96.8%为白人,28.5%处于或低于贫困线,32.5%使用胰岛素,A1C≥7%:54.2%)随机分为糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)+PL DSMS(n=119)或强化常规护理(EUC)(DSME+传统 DSMS,无 PL;n=102)。数据在基线、DSME 后(6 周)、DSMS 后(6 个月)和电话 DSMS 后(12 个月)进行收集。
结果 两组在基线和 DSME 后 A1C 均有所下降。两组在 DSMS 期间均持续改善,但在电话 DSMS 期间 A1C 水平升高。两组在 DSME 后自我监测血糖均有改善,且持续保持。在研究结束时,与 EUC 相比,干预组与糖尿病治疗方案相关的困扰减少了 4.3 倍。
结论 PL DSMS 与传统 DSMS 一样有效,有助于参与者维持血糖控制和自我血糖监测(SMBG),并更有效地改善困扰。随着糖尿病患病率的增加和糖尿病教育者的短缺,在高风险社区中整合和使用基于现有资源的低成本干预措施非常重要。