Division of Neuroradiology, Joint Division of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada -
Division of Neuroradiology, Joint Division of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Neurosurg Sci. 2021 Feb;65(1):33-37. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04498-3. Epub 2018 May 28.
We calculated the PHASES and ELAPSS scores for a large cohort of ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIA) in order to determine whether these RIA would have been pre-emptively treated or closely followed-up should they have been detected prior to rupture.
We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of RIA over a 20-year period. The primary outcome of this study was the PHASES score of each ruptured aneurysm included. Secondary outcomes were ELAPSS score and other risk factors for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage including aneurysm location, aneurysm size, aneurysm morphology, smoking and hypertension history, personal and family history of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Multiplicity of cerebral aneurysms was recorded. Descriptive statistics are reported.
700 consecutive ruptured aneurysms were included. Mean age at rupture was 56 (+/-13.5) years. Mean aneurysm size was 5.9 (+/-2.5) mm. Most common locations of ruptured aneurysms were the anterior cerebral/communicating artery (39%), posterior communicating artery (21%), middle cerebral artery (16%) and basilar terminus (7%). Mean PHASES score was 5.3 (+/-2.5) and 17% of the RIA had a PHASES score of 3 or less. Mean ELAPSS score was 13.89 (+/-7.05) and over half of the RIA included had a low risk of future growth.
A reasonable percentage of ruptured aneurysms have a low calculated PHASES score and these aneurysms may have been managed conservatively should they have presented incidentally prior to rupture. Most ruptured aneurysms also had a low ELAPSS score and were at low risk of future growth. The use PHASES score and ELAPSS score alone when making treatment decisions could result in many aneurysms being treated conservatively or undergoing remote surveillance despite rupture potential.
我们计算了大量破裂颅内动脉瘤(RIA)的 PHASES 和 ELAPSS 评分,以确定如果在破裂前发现这些 RIA,它们是否会被预防性治疗或密切随访。
我们回顾性分析了 20 年来连续系列的 RIA。本研究的主要结果是纳入的每个破裂动脉瘤的 PHASES 评分。次要结果是 ELAPSS 评分和蛛网膜下腔出血的其他动脉瘤危险因素,包括动脉瘤位置、动脉瘤大小、动脉瘤形态、吸烟和高血压史、蛛网膜下腔出血个人和家族史。记录多发性脑动脉瘤。报告描述性统计数据。
共纳入 700 例连续破裂的动脉瘤。破裂时的平均年龄为 56(+/-13.5)岁。平均动脉瘤大小为 5.9(+/-2.5)mm。破裂动脉瘤最常见的部位是前交通/大脑动脉(39%)、后交通动脉(21%)、大脑中动脉(16%)和基底动脉末端(7%)。平均 PHASES 评分为 5.3(+/-2.5),17%的 RIA 的 PHASES 评分为 3 或更低。平均 ELAPSS 评分为 13.89(+/-7.05),超过一半的 RIA 未来生长风险较低。
相当比例的破裂动脉瘤的计算 PHASES 评分较低,如果在破裂前偶然出现,这些动脉瘤可能可以保守治疗。大多数破裂动脉瘤的 ELAPSS 评分也较低,未来生长风险较低。在做出治疗决策时单独使用 PHASES 评分和 ELAPSS 评分可能会导致许多动脉瘤被保守治疗或进行远程监测,尽管存在破裂风险。