Suppr超能文献

PHASES 评分:治疗还是不治疗?颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者破裂风险的回顾性评估。

The PHASES score: To treat or not to treat? Retrospective evaluation of the risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

机构信息

Department of Interventional Neuroradiology Neuro Brain Vascular Center, Hôpital Bicêtre, Paris Sud Université, AP-HP, 78 Rue du Général Leclerc, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo SP, Brazil.

Department of Interventional Neuroradiology Neuro Brain Vascular Center, Hôpital Bicêtre, Paris Sud Université, AP-HP, 78 Rue du Général Leclerc, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.

出版信息

J Neuroradiol. 2020 Sep;47(5):349-352. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The PHASES score was formulated to predict the 5-year risk of rupture for intracranial aneurysms. We retrospectively analyzed all patients treated in our institution for aneurysmal SAH and applied the PHASES score to estimate the probable predicted risk of bleeding in this group of patients.

METHODS

Between February 2015 and August 2018, all patients with aneurysmal SAH were retrospectively analyzed and the PHASES score was applied. A total of 155 patients were included with a mean age of 53.8years, including 60 males and 95 females.

RESULTS

Of our patients 110 (70.9%) had a PHASES score of below or equal to 5, with a hemorrhagic risk of up to 1.3% over 5years. If we analyze the patients with a risk of below 2% this figure increases to 122 patients (78.7%). Of these 99.3% were European and 0.6% were Japanese (1 patient). In 86 patients (55.4%), the aneurysm was smaller than 5mm and in 10 patients (6.4%) the aneurysm was located in the posterior circulation.

CONCLUSION

Of our patients 78.7% had less than a 2% 5-year rupture risk based on their PHASES score, highlighting the discrepancy of the rupture risk calculated with the PHASES score when hypothetically applied to this group of patients. In the hypothetical scenario that our patients had unruptured aneurysms, our retrospective analysis shows that the PHASES score may only provide a weak tool for clinicians to use in the decision-making process as to whether or not to treat these aneurysms.

摘要

背景与目的

PHASES 评分旨在预测颅内动脉瘤 5 年破裂风险。我们回顾性分析了我院所有接受治疗的颅内破裂动脉瘤患者,并应用 PHASES 评分来评估该组患者的可能出血风险。

方法

2015 年 2 月至 2018 年 8 月,回顾性分析所有颅内破裂动脉瘤患者,并应用 PHASES 评分。共纳入 155 例患者,平均年龄为 53.8 岁,包括 60 例男性和 95 例女性。

结果

我们的患者中有 110 例(70.9%)的 PHASES 评分为 5 或以下,5 年内出血风险高达 1.3%。如果我们分析风险低于 2%的患者,这一数字将增加到 122 例(78.7%)。其中 99.3%为欧洲人,0.6%为日本人(1 例)。在 86 例(55.4%)患者中,动脉瘤直径小于 5mm,10 例(6.4%)患者动脉瘤位于后循环。

结论

根据 PHASES 评分,我们的患者中有 78.7%的患者 5 年内破裂风险低于 2%,这突出了在假设应用于该组患者时,用 PHASES 评分计算的破裂风险存在差异。在假设我们的患者没有破裂的动脉瘤的情况下,我们的回顾性分析表明,PHASES 评分可能只是临床医生在是否治疗这些动脉瘤的决策过程中使用的一个较弱的工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验