Suppr超能文献

干预措施在改善低收入和中等收入国家的饮食行为方面有多有效?系统评价和荟萃分析。

How effective are interventions in improving dietary behaviour in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

a Leeds Institute of Health Sciences , University of Leeds , Leeds , UK.

b School of Psychology , University of Leeds , Leeds , UK.

出版信息

Health Psychol Rev. 2018 Sep;12(3):312-331. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1481763. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

Abstract

Several interventions encouraging people to change their diet have been tested in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) but these have not been meta-synthesised and it is not known which elements of these interventions contribute to their effectiveness. The current review addressed these issues. Randomised controlled trials of dietary interventions in LMICs were eligible and identified via eight publication databases. Elements of both the intervention and comparison groups (e.g., behaviour change techniques (BCTs), delivery mode), participant characteristics and risk of bias were coded. Random effects meta-analysis of 76 randomised controlled trials found, on average, small- to medium-sized but highly heterogeneous improvement in dietary behaviour following an intervention. Small and homogeneous improvements were found for BMI/weight, waist- and hip-circumference, with medium-sized, but heterogeneous, improvements in blood pressure and cholesterol. Although many BCTs have yet to be tested in this context, meta-regressions suggested some BCTs (action planning, self-monitoring of outcome(s) of behaviour; demonstration of behaviour) as well as individually randomised trials, adult- or hypertensive-samples and lack of blinding were associated with larger dietary behaviour effect sizes. Interventions to encourage people from LMICs to change their diet produce, on average, small-to-medium-sized effects. These effects may possibly be increased through the inclusion of specific BCTs and other study elements.

摘要

已经在中低收入国家(LMICs)测试了几种鼓励人们改变饮食的干预措施,但这些干预措施尚未进行综合分析,也不知道这些干预措施的哪些要素有助于其有效性。本综述旨在解决这些问题。通过八个出版物数据库,对 LMICs 中饮食干预的随机对照试验进行了筛选。对干预组和对照组的元素(例如,行为改变技术(BCTs)、传递模式)、参与者特征和偏倚风险进行了编码。对 76 项随机对照试验的随机效应荟萃分析发现,平均而言,干预后饮食行为有小到中等但高度异质性的改善。BMI/体重、腰围和臀围的改善较小且同质,血压和胆固醇的改善中等但异质。尽管许多 BCT 在这种情况下尚未得到测试,但荟萃回归表明,一些 BCT(行动计划、行为结果的自我监测;行为示范)以及个体随机试验、成人或高血压样本和无盲法与更大的饮食行为效果大小相关。鼓励来自 LMICs 的人们改变饮食的干预措施平均产生小到中等的效果。通过纳入特定的 BCT 和其他研究要素,这些效果可能会增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验