• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性主动脉夹层复发性疼痛的发生率及危险因素与院内死亡率

Incidence and risk factors of recurrent pain in acute aortic dissection and in-hospital mortality.

作者信息

Siti Dilixiati, Abudesimu Asiya, Ma Xiaojie, Yang Lei, Ma Xiang, Ma Yi-Tong

机构信息

1 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.

出版信息

Vasa. 2018 Jun;47(4):301-310. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000704. Epub 2018 May 29.

DOI:10.1024/0301-1526/a000704
PMID:29808775
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We investigated the prevalence of recurrent pain and its relationship with in-hospital mortality in acute aortic dissection (AAD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2011 and 2016, 234 AAD patients were selected. Recurrent pain was defined as a mean of VAS > 3, within 48 hours following hospital admission or before emergency operation. Patients with and without recurrent pain were divided into group I and group II, respectively into type A AAD and type B AAD patients. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The incidence of recurrent pain was 24.4 % in AAD patients. Incidence of recurrent pain was higher in type A AAD patients than type B AAD patients (48.9 vs. 9.6 %). Overall in-hospital mortality was 25.6 %. Type A AAD had a higher in-hospital mortality than type B AAD patients (47.7 vs. 12.3 %). Group I had significantly higher in-hospital mortality than group II (type A: 79.1 vs. 17.8 %; type B: 57.1 vs. 7.6 %, all P < 0.001), as was the case with medical managed patients (type A: 72.1 vs. 13.3 %; type B: 35.7 vs. 2.3 %, all P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that use of one drug alone and waist pain were predictive factors for recurrent pain in type A AAD and type A AAD patients, respectively (OR 3.686, 95 % CI: 1.10312.316, P = 0.034 and OR 14.010, 95 % CI: 2.48179.103, P = 0.003). Recurrent pains were the risk factors (type A: OR 11.096, 95 % CI: 3.05740.280, P < 0.001; type B: OR 14.412, 95 % CI: 3.66256.723, P < 0.001), while invasive interventions were protective (type A: OR 0.133, 95 % CI: 0.0350.507, P < 0.001; type B: OR 0.334, 95 % CI: 0.1200.929, P = 0.036) for in-hospital mortality in AAD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-fourth of AAD patients presented with recurrent pains, which might increase in-hospital mortality. Thus, interventional strategies at early stages are important.

摘要

背景

我们研究了急性主动脉夹层(AAD)患者中复发性疼痛的发生率及其与院内死亡率的关系。

患者与方法

选取2011年至2016年间的234例AAD患者。复发性疼痛定义为入院后48小时内或急诊手术前视觉模拟评分(VAS)平均值>3。有和无复发性疼痛的患者分别分为I组和II组,再分别分为A型AAD患者和B型AAD患者。我们的主要结局是院内死亡率。

结果

AAD患者中复发性疼痛的发生率为24.4%。A型AAD患者复发性疼痛的发生率高于B型AAD患者(48.9%对9.6%)。总体院内死亡率为25.6%。A型AAD患者的院内死亡率高于B型AAD患者(47.7%对12.3%)。I组的院内死亡率显著高于II组(A型:79.1%对17.8%;B型:57.1%对7.6%,所有P<0.001),药物治疗的患者也是如此(A型:72.1%对13.3%;B型:35.7%对2.3%,所有P<0.001)。逻辑回归分析显示,单独使用一种药物和腰部疼痛分别是A型AAD和A型AAD患者复发性疼痛的预测因素(比值比[OR]3.686,95%置信区间[CI]:1.10312.316,P = 0.034;OR 14.010,95%CI:2.48179.103,P = 0.003)。复发性疼痛是危险因素(A型:OR 11.096,95%CI:3.05740.280,P<0.001;B型:OR 14.412,95%CI:3.66256.723,P<0.001),而侵入性干预对AAD患者的院内死亡率具有保护作用(A型:OR 0.133,95%CI:0.0350.507,P<0.001;B型:OR 0.334,95%CI:0.1200.929,P = 0.036)。

结论

约四分之一的AAD患者出现复发性疼痛,这可能会增加院内死亡率。因此,早期的干预策略很重要。

相似文献

1
Incidence and risk factors of recurrent pain in acute aortic dissection and in-hospital mortality.急性主动脉夹层复发性疼痛的发生率及危险因素与院内死亡率
Vasa. 2018 Jun;47(4):301-310. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000704. Epub 2018 May 29.
2
Clinical features and risk factors of postoperative in-hospital mortality following surgical repair of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection.Stanford 型 A 急性主动脉夹层手术后住院内死亡的临床特征和危险因素。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Aug 12;21(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02107-1.
3
Clinical features and prognosis of patients with acute aortic dissection in China.中国急性主动脉夹层患者的临床特征与预后
J Int Med Res. 2017 Apr;45(2):823-829. doi: 10.1177/0300060517699319. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
4
Effectiveness of chest pain center accreditation on the hospital outcome of acute aortic dissection: a nationwide study in China.胸痛中心认证对急性主动脉夹层患者医院结局的影响:中国的一项全国性研究。
Mil Med Res. 2024 Aug 26;11(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40779-024-00565-0.
5
High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T: A biomarker for the early risk stratification of type-A acute aortic dissection?高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T:A型急性主动脉夹层早期风险分层的生物标志物?
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Mar;109(3):163-70. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.09.007. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
6
Need for Limb Revascularization in Patients with Acute Aortic Dissection is Associated with Mesenteric Ischemia.急性主动脉夹层患者肢体血管重建需求与肠系膜缺血相关。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;36:112-120. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.03.012. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
7
Impact of ascending aortic, hemiarch and arch repair on early and long-term outcomes in patients with Stanford A acute aortic dissection.升主动脉、半弓和全弓修复对斯坦福A型急性主动脉夹层患者早期及长期预后的影响
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Dec;12(12):327-340. doi: 10.1177/1753944718801568. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
8
Stable haemodynamics associated with no significant electrocardiogram abnormalities is a good prognostic factor of survival for acute type A aortic dissection repair.与无明显心电图异常相关的稳定血流动力学是急性A型主动脉夹层修复术生存的良好预后因素。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Feb;16(2):158-65. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs463. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
9
Determinants of in-hospital death and rupture in patients with a Stanford B aortic dissection.斯坦福B型主动脉夹层患者院内死亡和破裂的决定因素。
Circ J. 2007 Oct;71(10):1521-4. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.1521.
10
Management of patients with acute aortic syndrome through a regional rapid transport system.通过区域快速转运系统对急性主动脉综合征患者进行管理。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;65(1):21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.08.081. Epub 2016 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between Heart Rate and Mortality Risk in Patients With Acute Aortic Dissection: A Meta-Analysis.急性主动脉夹层患者心率与死亡风险的关系:一项荟萃分析
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 27;26(5):27755. doi: 10.31083/RCM27755. eCollection 2025 May.
2
The short-term safety and effectiveness of a new distal perforating stent graft in Type B aortic dissection: a retrospective study.新型远端穿透性支架移植物治疗 B 型主动脉夹层的短期安全性和有效性:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Sep 21;21(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02270-5.