Webster Catherine A, Farnworth Mark J
a School of Biological and Marine Sciences , Plymouth University , Devon , United Kingdom.
b Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences , Nottingham Trent University , Southwell , United Kingdom.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2019 Jul-Sep;22(3):240-254. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2018.1476864. Epub 2018 May 30.
Canine aggression came into the public eye in the United Kingdom in the late 1980s prompting enactment of the UK Dangerous Dogs Act , which prohibits four breeds or "types" of dogs. The act faced strong opposition surrounding correct identification of prohibited dogs. A questionnaire was distributed to the public via an online platform, especially targetting those who have worked with dogs. The questionnaire assessed respondents' abilities to identify the four banned types of dogs from other breeds and their capability to identify Pit Bull Terrier types from other similar dog types. Identification of both banned breeds, F(1, 20) = 57.746, p < .001, and bull breeds, F(1, 20) = 9.293, p = .006, was significantly lower than identification of other breeds. Recognition of Pit Bull Terrier types from similar types of dogs was generally poor, although people in a dog-related profession, as opposed to those in other professions, could correctly distinguish more pit bull-type dogs (U = 46,164.0, n = 187, n = 575, p = .003). Findings suggest public understanding of dangerous dogs is poor, and it may impact societal perceptions of dogs more widely.
20世纪80年代末,犬类攻击行为在英国引起了公众关注,促使英国颁布了《危险犬只法案》,该法案禁止四种犬种或“类型”的狗。该法案在禁止犬只的正确识别方面面临强烈反对。通过在线平台向公众发放了一份问卷,尤其针对那些与狗打交道的人。该问卷评估了受访者从其他犬种中识别出四种被禁犬种的能力,以及他们从其他类似犬种中识别比特斗牛梗犬种的能力。对两种被禁犬种的识别,F(1, 20) = 57.746, p <.001,以及对斗牛犬种的识别,F(1, 20) = 9.293, p =.006,均显著低于对其他犬种的识别。从类似犬种中识别比特斗牛梗犬种的能力普遍较差,不过与其他职业的人相比,从事与狗相关职业的人能正确区分出更多的比特斗牛梗犬种(U = 46,164.0, n = 187, n = 575, p =.003)。研究结果表明公众对危险犬只的了解很差,这可能会更广泛地影响社会对犬只的认知。