Zhu Ning, Jiang Wenbing, Wang Yi, Wu Youyang, Chen Hao, Zhao Xuyong
Department of Cardiology, The Third Clinical College of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People's Hospital, No. 57 Canghou Street, Wenzhou, 325000, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 29;18(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0850-0.
Free fatty acids (FFAs) predicted the risk of heart failure (HF) and were elevated in HF with very low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared to healthy subjects. The aim of this study was to investigate whether total levels of FFA in plasma differed in patients with HF with preserved (HFpEF), mid-range (HFmrEF), and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and the association with the three categories.
One hundred thirty-nine patients with HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFrEF were investigated in this study. Plasma FFA levels were measured using commercially available assay kits, and LVEF was calculated by echocardiography with the Simpson biplane method. Dyspnea ranked by New York Heart Association (NYHA) was also identified.
FFA concentrations were higher in HFrEF than in HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively (689 ± 321.5 μmol/L vs. 537.9 ± 221.6 μmol/L, p = 0.036; 689 ± 321.5 μmol/L vs. 527.5 ± 185.5 μmol/L, p = 0.008). No significant differences in FFA levels were found between HFmrEF and HFpEF (537.9 ± 221.6 μmol/L vs. 527.5 ± 185.5 μmol/L, p = 0.619). In addition, we found a negative correlation between FFA levels and LVEF (regression coefficient: - 0.229, p = 0.004) and a positive correlation between FFAs and NYHA class (regression coefficient: 0.214, p = 0.014) after adjustment for clinical characteristic, medical history and therapies. ROC analysis revealed that FFAs predicted HFrEF across the three categories (AUC: 0.644, p = 0.005) and the optimal cut-off level to predict HFrEF was FFA levels above 575 μmol/L.
FFA levels differed across the three categories, which suggests that energy metabolism differs between HFpEF, HFmrEF and HFrEF.
游离脂肪酸(FFA)可预测心力衰竭(HF)风险,与健康受试者相比,在左心室射血分数(LVEF)极低的HF患者中游离脂肪酸水平升高。本研究旨在调查射血分数保留的HF(HFpEF)、射血分数中度降低的HF(HFmrEF)和射血分数降低的HF(HFrEF)患者血浆中FFA的总水平是否存在差异,以及与这三种类型的关联。
本研究纳入了139例HFpEF、HFmrEF和HFrEF患者。使用市售检测试剂盒测量血浆FFA水平,采用双平面辛普森法通过超声心动图计算LVEF。还确定了纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级的呼吸困难情况。
HFrEF患者的FFA浓度分别高于HFmrEF和HFpEF患者(689±321.5 μmol/L对537.9±221.6 μmol/L,p = 0.036;689±321.5 μmol/L对527.5±185.5 μmol/L,p = 0.008)。HFmrEF和HFpEF患者之间的FFA水平无显著差异(537.9±221.6 μmol/L对527.5±185.5 μmol/L,p = 0.619)。此外,在调整临床特征、病史和治疗后,我们发现FFA水平与LVEF呈负相关(回归系数:-0.229,p = 0.004),FFA与NYHA分级呈正相关(回归系数:0.214,p = 0.014)。ROC分析显示,FFA可在这三种类型中预测HFrEF(AUC:0.644,p = 0.005),预测HFrEF的最佳截断水平为FFA水平高于575 μmol/L。
FFA水平在这三种类型中存在差异,这表明HFpEF、HFmrEF和HFrEF之间的能量代谢不同。