From the Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.J.A., N.N., C.B.S.).
Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (J.A.).
Stroke. 2018 Jul;49(7):1719-1726. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020461. Epub 2018 May 29.
Cerebral microbleeds are linked to cognitive decline, but it remains unclear how they impair neuronal function. Infarction is not typically observed near microbleeds, suggesting more subtle mechanisms, such as inflammation, may play a role. Because of their small size and largely asymptomatic nature, real-time detection and study of spontaneous cerebral microbleeds in humans and animal models are difficult.
We used in vivo 2-photon microscopy through a chronic cranial window in adult mice to follow the inflammatory response after a cortical microhemorrhage of ≈100 µm diameter, induced by rupturing a targeted cortical arteriole with a laser.
The inflammatory response included the invasion of blood-borne leukocytes, the migration and proliferation of brain-resident microglia, and the activation of astrocytes. Nearly all inflammatory cells responding to the microhemorrhage were brain-resident microglia, but a small number of CX3CR1 and CCR2 macrophages, ultimately originating from the invasion of blood-borne monocytes, were also found near the lesion. We found a coordinated pattern of microglia migration and proliferation, where microglia within 200 µm of the microhemorrhage migrated toward the lesion over hours to days. In contrast, microglia proliferation was not observed until ≈40 hours after the lesion and occurred primarily in a shell-shaped region where the migration of microglia decreased their local density. These data suggest that local microglia density changes may trigger proliferation. Astrocytes activated in a similar region as microglia but delayed by a few days. By 2 weeks, this inflammatory response had largely resolved.
Although microhemorrhages are small in size, the brain responds to a single bleed with an inflammatory response that involves brain-resident and blood-derived cells, persists for weeks, and may impact the adjacent brain microenvironment.
脑微出血与认知能力下降有关,但目前尚不清楚它们如何损害神经元功能。微出血附近通常不会发生梗死,这表明更微妙的机制,如炎症,可能发挥作用。由于其体积小且基本无症状,因此实时检测和研究人类和动物模型中的自发性脑微出血具有挑战性。
我们使用成年小鼠慢性颅窗中的活体双光子显微镜,通过激光破坏靶向皮质小动脉,来跟踪 ≈100 µm 直径的皮质微出血后的炎症反应。
炎症反应包括血源性白细胞的浸润、脑驻留小胶质细胞的迁移和增殖,以及星形胶质细胞的激活。几乎所有对微出血有反应的炎症细胞都是脑驻留小胶质细胞,但也发现了一小部分 CX3CR1 和 CCR2 巨噬细胞,它们最终源自血源性单核细胞的入侵,也存在于病变附近。我们发现了小胶质细胞迁移和增殖的协调模式,即距微出血 200 µm 内的小胶质细胞在数小时至数天内向病变迁移。相比之下,直到病变后 ≈40 小时才观察到小胶质细胞增殖,并且主要发生在小胶质细胞迁移降低其局部密度的壳状区域。这些数据表明,局部小胶质细胞密度的变化可能触发增殖。星形胶质细胞在与小胶质细胞相似的区域激活,但延迟了几天。2 周后,这种炎症反应已基本消退。
尽管微出血的体积很小,但大脑会对单个出血做出反应,引发涉及脑驻留和血源性细胞的炎症反应,持续数周,并可能影响相邻的脑微环境。