Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Okanagan campus, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.
Sci Rep. 2018 May 29;8(1):8283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26423-3.
While probiotics are a multi-billion dollar industry, there is little evidence to show that supplementing infants provides any health benefits. We conducted an observational study where 35 of 86 participating mothers self-administered probiotics during breastfeeding, as well as directly to their infants. The primary objective was to determine if probiotic exposure influenced the infants' fecal microbiome while the secondary objective assessed associated changes to the mothers' breast milk immunity and infant health. Analysis of infant fecal microbiome throughout the first 6 months of life revealed that probiotics were associated with higher abundances of Bifidobacterium at week 1 only. Short-chain fatty acid production and predicted metagenomic functions of the microbial communities were not altered. While probiotics did not alter breast milk immune markers, fecal sIgA responses were higher among probiotic supplemented infants. Surprisingly, this was not associated with better health outcomes, as the probiotic cohort had higher incidences of mucosal-associated illnesses as toddlers. This retrospective clinical comparison suggests that probiotic exposure during infancy has limited effects on gut microbial composition yet is associated with increased infection later in life. These correlative findings caution against probiotic supplementation during infancy until rigorous controlled follow-up studies determining their safety and efficacy have occurred.
虽然益生菌产业价值数十亿美元,但几乎没有证据表明补充婴儿益生菌有任何健康益处。我们进行了一项观察性研究,其中 86 名参与母亲中有 35 名在母乳喂养期间以及直接给婴儿补充益生菌。主要目的是确定益生菌暴露是否会影响婴儿的粪便微生物组,次要目的是评估与母亲母乳免疫力和婴儿健康相关的变化。对婴儿粪便微生物组在生命的前 6 个月的分析表明,益生菌仅在第 1 周与双歧杆菌的丰度增加有关。短链脂肪酸的产生和微生物群落的预测宏基因组功能没有改变。虽然益生菌没有改变母乳免疫标志物,但补充益生菌的婴儿粪便 sIgA 反应更高。令人惊讶的是,这与更好的健康结果无关,因为益生菌组幼儿期粘膜相关疾病的发病率更高。这项回顾性临床比较表明,婴儿期接触益生菌对肠道微生物组成的影响有限,但与以后生活中的感染增加有关。这些相关性发现告诫人们,在进行严格的对照随访研究以确定其安全性和有效性之前,不要在婴儿期补充益生菌。