• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达芬奇吻合器在机器人辅助右半结肠切除术联合腔内吻合术中的应用效果。

Performance of da Vinci Stapler during robotic-assisted right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Oklahoma Surgical Hospital, 2408 E81st St Suite 300, Tulsa, OK, 74137, USA.

Colon and Rectal Clinic of Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2019 Feb;13(1):115-119. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0828-z. Epub 2018 May 30.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-018-0828-z
PMID:29846869
Abstract

Applications for surgical staplers continue to grow, due to the increase in minimally invasive surgical approaches, and range from vessel ligation to tissue transection and anastomoses. Complications associated with stapled tissue, such as bleeding or leaks, continue to be a concern for surgeons, as both can be associated with prolonged operative times and can contribute to postoperative morbidity and mortality. The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate the performance of the da Vinci Xi EndoWrist Stapler 45 with SmartClamp™ technology during robotic-assisted right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. We reviewed 113 consecutive cases from four medical centers. Preclinical diagnoses were inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (n = 5), benign bowel disease (n = 77), and malignant bowel disease (n = 31). No anastomotic leaks occurred; one event of anastomotic bleeding (0.88%) resolved without surgical intervention. Overall, there were 643 clamp attempts (5.7 attempts per case), and 570 fires (5.0 fires per case). SmartClamp™ occurrences happened in approximately one out of three cases, with the highest proportion of occurrences in the IBD group (2.0 occurrences per case). The most commonly fired reload was blue (1.5 mm closed height) with 4.1 blue reloads fired per case overall. No incomplete fires occurred during the procedures. The study data demonstrate the performance of the da Vinci Xi EndoWrist Stapler 45 as used in right colon resection with intracorporeal anastomosis. The collection and analysis of these data provide surgeons with information related to stapler firings, which were not previously available; as such, this analysis may lead to deductions that are useful for intraoperative decision-making and clinical outcomes.

摘要

由于微创外科方法的增加,手术吻合器的应用不断增加,范围从血管结扎到组织横断和吻合。吻合器吻合组织相关的并发症,如出血或渗漏,仍然是外科医生关注的问题,因为两者都可能与手术时间延长有关,并可能导致术后发病率和死亡率增加。本回顾性研究的目的是评估达芬奇 Xi 腕式 EndoWrist 吻合器 45 与 SmartClamp™ 技术在机器人辅助右结肠切除术和腔内吻合术中的性能。我们回顾了来自四个医疗中心的 113 例连续病例。临床前诊断为炎症性肠病(IBD)(n=5)、良性肠病(n=77)和恶性肠病(n=31)。无吻合口漏发生;1 例吻合口出血(0.88%)事件未经手术干预即得到解决。总体而言,有 643 次夹闭尝试(每例 5.7 次尝试)和 570 次点火(每例 5.0 次点火)。SmartClamp™ 事件发生在大约三分之一的病例中,在 IBD 组中的发生率最高(每例 2.0 次事件)。最常发射的再装载是蓝色(1.5 毫米闭合高度),总体上每例发射 4.1 次蓝色再装载。在手术过程中没有发生不完全点火。研究数据表明达芬奇 Xi 腕式 EndoWrist 吻合器 45 在右结肠切除和腔内吻合术中的性能。收集和分析这些数据为外科医生提供了与吻合器点火相关的信息,这些信息以前是无法获得的;因此,这种分析可能会得出对术中决策和临床结果有用的推论。

相似文献

1
Performance of da Vinci Stapler during robotic-assisted right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis.达芬奇吻合器在机器人辅助右半结肠切除术联合腔内吻合术中的应用效果。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Feb;13(1):115-119. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0828-z. Epub 2018 May 30.
2
Control Comparison of the New EndoWrist and Traditional Laparoscopic Staplers for Anterior Rectal Resection with the Da Vinci Xi: A Case Study.新型EndoWrist与传统腹腔镜吻合器用于达芬奇Xi机器人进行直肠前切除术的对照比较:一项病例研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Dec;28(12):1422-1427. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0218. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
3
Minimally invasive left colectomy with total intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis. A single center cohort study. Stage 2b IDEAL framework for evaluating surgical innovation.经肛门全腹腔镜左半结肠切除术与腹腔镜辅助左半结肠切除术的对比:一项单中心队列研究。2b 期 IDEAL 框架用于评估外科创新。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jul 19;409(1):225. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03387-9.
4
A sutureless overlapped anastomosis technique using linear staplers with reinforced bioabsorbable material in robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis.机器人右半结肠切除术的腔内吻合中使用带有增强型可吸收材料的线性吻合器进行无缝合重叠吻合技术。
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr;26(4):754-759. doi: 10.1111/codi.16880. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
5
Assessment of a circular powered stapler for creation of anastomosis in left-sided colorectal surgery: A prospective cohort study.评估圆形电动吻合器在左半结直肠手术中吻合口的建立:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2020 Dec;84:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
6
The Use of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgical Stapling Devices During Minimally Invasive Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Comparison.微创结肠和直肠手术中机器人与腹腔镜手术吻合器的应用:一项比较研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Feb;27(2):151-155. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0409. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
7
From Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with Extracorporeal Anastomosis to Robot-Assisted Intracorporeal Anastomosis to Totally Robotic Right Colectomy for Cancer: The Evolution of Robotic Multiquadrant Abdominal Surgery.从腹腔镜右半结肠切除术加体外吻合术到机器人辅助体内吻合术再到全机器人右半结肠切除术治疗癌症:机器人多象限腹部手术的演变
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Oct;28(10):1216-1222. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0693. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
8
Anastomotic bleeding following ileocolic end-to-side anastomosis using a circular stapler: incidence and risk factors.使用圆形吻合器行回肠-结肠端侧吻合术后吻合口出血:发生率及危险因素。
Surg Today. 2020 Nov;50(11):1368-1374. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02022-6. Epub 2020 May 20.
9
A single surgeon's experience transitioning to robotic-assisted right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis.一位外科医生行机器人辅助右半结肠切除术并完成腔内吻合的经验。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3525-3532. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6074-7. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
10
Robotic left-stapled total intracorporeal bowel anastomosis versus stapled partial extracorporeal anastomosis: operative technical description and outcomes.机器人辅助左钉合全腔内肠道吻合术与钉合部分体外吻合术的比较:手术技术描述和结果。
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3645-3652. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09048-6. Epub 2022 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for patients ≥ 65 years of age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.≥65岁患者机器人辅助与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术短期结局的比较:前瞻性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Feb 4;19(1):60. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02222-7.
2
Do advances in technology translate to improved outcomes? Comparing robotic bariatric surgery outcomes over two-time intervals utilizing the MBSAQIP database.技术进步是否转化为改善的结果?利用 MBSAQIP 数据库比较两个时间段的机器人减重手术结果。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7970-7979. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10208-5. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Use of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgical Stapling Devices During Minimally Invasive Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Comparison.微创结肠和直肠手术中机器人与腹腔镜手术吻合器的应用:一项比较研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Feb;27(2):151-155. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0409. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
2
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit.全国范围内的审计显示,结直肠癌手术后吻合口漏及与漏相关的死亡率的危险因素。
Br J Surg. 2014 Mar;101(4):424-32; discussion 432. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9395.
3
The impact of postoperative complications on long-term quality of life after curative colorectal cancer surgery.
Comparison of robotic right colectomy and laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
机器人右半结肠切除术与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Jul;27(7):521-535. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02821-2. Epub 2023 May 15.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Mar;18(1):20-30. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.120960. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
5
Biologically inspired gastrointestinal stapler design: "Getting to Zero" complications.受生物学启发的胃肠吻合器设计:“实现零并发症”。
Am J Surg. 2023 Jul;226(1):48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.030. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
6
Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for right colon cancer surgery.右半结肠癌手术的体外与体内吻合术
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Sep 15;25(3):91-96. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.3.91.
7
Comparison between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sphincter-preserving operations for ultra-low rectal cancer.机器人辅助与腹腔镜保肛手术治疗超低位直肠癌的比较
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Mar 15;6(5):643-650. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12564. eCollection 2022 Sep.
8
Aspects Towards the Anastomotic Healing in Crohn's Disease: Clinical Approach and Current Gaps in Research.克罗恩病吻合口愈合的相关方面:临床方法与当前研究空白
Front Surg. 2022 Jun 24;9:882625. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.882625. eCollection 2022.
9
Ileo-colic intra-corporeal anastomosis during robotic right colectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of different techniques.机器人辅助右半结肠切除术中的回结肠体内吻合术:不同技术的系统文献综述和荟萃分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jun;36(6):1097-1110. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03850-9. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
10
Advantages of using a robotic stapler in rectal cancer surgery.使用机器人吻合器进行直肠癌手术的优势。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):365-370. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00993-4. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
根治性结直肠癌手术后术后并发症对长期生活质量的影响。
Ann Surg. 2014 May;259(5):916-23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000407.
4
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis with a double stapling technique.腹腔镜经肛直肠端端吻合术中双吻合器技术吻合口漏的危险因素。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Dec;209(6):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.021.
5
Colorectal anastomotic leak rates are measures of technical skill in surgery.结直肠吻合口漏发生率是手术技术水平的衡量指标。
ANZ J Surg. 2001 Sep;71(9):508-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02181.x.