• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当地含糖饮料健康促进和提价对公共休闲中心设施销售的影响。

The impact of a local sugar sweetened beverage health promotion and price increase on sales in public leisure centre facilities.

机构信息

School for Health and Related Research, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Sheffield City Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 May 30;13(5):e0194637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194637. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0194637
PMID:29847553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5976158/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the impact of a local sugar sweetened beverages (SSB) health promotion and 20p price increase in leisure centre venues and estimate the impact on consumption.

METHOD

Monthly cold drinks sales data and attendance at leisure centres across the city of Sheffield were analysed over the period January 2015-July 2017. Interrupted time-series methods were employed to estimate changes in consumption per attendance of SSB and non-SSB cold drinks following the introduction of the SSB policy from August 2016 adjusting for seasonal variation and autocorrelation. SSB price elasticities were estimated with fixed effects log-log models by SSB product type (soda can, soda bottle, soda post mix, energy drinks, juice from concentrate).

FINDINGS

We estimated a 31% (95% CI 4%, 59%) reduction in units of SSB sold per attendance in the year since the policy was introduced. We did not observe substitution effects to fruit juice or water but found sales of other artificially sweetened non-SSB products increased by 27% (95% CI 6%, 47%) after the introduction of the tax. Price elasticity analysis identified that a 1% increase in price alongside health promotion leads to a 3.8% (95% CI 3.1% 4.4%) decrease in demand for SSB's. Price elasticity of demand was highest for child friendly and high caffeine energy drinks.

INTERPRETATION

Demand for SSB drinks at leisure centre venues is highly responsive to the policy, particularly for child-friendly and high caffeine energy drinks, compared with other SSB tax policy evaluations. The policy also increased purchases of carbonated non-SSB.

摘要

背景

我们旨在评估在休闲中心场所进行的本地含糖饮料(SSB)健康促进和 20 便士提价对消费的影响,并估计对消费的影响。

方法

分析了谢菲尔德市整个城市从 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 7 月期间每月冷饮销售数据和休闲中心的出勤率。采用中断时间序列方法,根据 2016 年 8 月 SSB 政策实施后的 SSB 和非 SSB 冷饮每次出勤的消费变化,调整季节性变化和自相关。通过 SSB 产品类型(罐装苏打水、瓶装苏打水、苏打水后混合、能量饮料、浓缩果汁)的固定效应对数-对数模型估计 SSB 价格弹性。

结果

我们估计,自政策实施以来,每年 SSB 的销售量减少了 31%(95%CI 4%,59%)。我们没有观察到对果汁或水的替代效应,但发现税收出台后,其他人工加糖的非 SSB 产品的销售额增加了 27%(95%CI 6%,47%)。价格弹性分析表明,在健康促进的基础上,价格上涨 1%,将导致 SSB 需求减少 3.8%(95%CI 3.1%,4.4%)。儿童友好型和高咖啡因能量饮料的 SSB 需求价格弹性最高。

解释

与其他 SSB 税收政策评估相比,休闲中心场所的 SSB 饮料需求对该政策非常敏感,尤其是针对儿童友好型和高咖啡因能量饮料。该政策还增加了碳酸非 SSB 的购买量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f27c/5976158/5eb4606fd942/pone.0194637.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f27c/5976158/0c6a2799a662/pone.0194637.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f27c/5976158/5eb4606fd942/pone.0194637.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f27c/5976158/0c6a2799a662/pone.0194637.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f27c/5976158/5eb4606fd942/pone.0194637.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of a local sugar sweetened beverage health promotion and price increase on sales in public leisure centre facilities.当地含糖饮料健康促进和提价对公共休闲中心设施销售的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 May 30;13(5):e0194637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194637. eCollection 2018.
2
Change in non-alcoholic beverage sales following a 10-pence levy on sugar-sweetened beverages within a national chain of restaurants in the UK: interrupted time series analysis of a natural experiment.英国全国连锁餐厅对含糖饮料征收 10 便士税之后非酒精饮料销售变化:自然实验中断时间序列分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Nov;71(11):1107-1112. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209947.
3
Effect of increasing the price of sugar-sweetened beverages on alcoholic beverage purchases: an economic analysis of sales data.提高含糖饮料价格对酒精饮料购买量的影响:基于销售数据的经济分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Apr;72(4):324-330. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209791. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
4
Price elasticity of the demand for sugar sweetened beverages and soft drinks in Mexico.墨西哥含糖饮料和软饮料需求的价格弹性。
Econ Hum Biol. 2015 Dec;19:129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
5
Retailer-Led Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Price Increase Reduces Purchases in a Hospital Convenience Store in Melbourne, Australia: A Mixed Methods Evaluation.零售商主导的含糖饮料提价减少了澳大利亚墨尔本一家医院便利店内的购买量:一项混合方法评估。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jun;118(6):1027-1036.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.06.367. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
6
Assessing the impact of the Barbados sugar-sweetened beverage tax on beverage sales: an observational study.评估巴巴多斯含糖饮料税对饮料销售的影响:一项观察性研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Jan 30;16(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0776-7.
7
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.美国加利福尼亚州伯克利市对含糖饮料征税一年后价格、销量、消费者支出及饮料消费的变化:一项前后对照研究
PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.
8
Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health.减少含糖饮料消费的环境干预措施及其对健康的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012292.pub2.
9
Change in drink purchases in 16 Australian recreation centres following a sugar-sweetened beverage reduction initiative: an observational study.在澳大利亚 16 个娱乐中心实施减少含糖饮料的倡议后,饮料购买量的变化:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 4;10(3):e029492. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029492.
10
Own-price, cross-price, and expenditure elasticities on sugar-sweetened beverages in Guatemala.危地马拉含糖饮料的自价格、交叉价格和支出弹性。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 22;13(10):e0205931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205931. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Does cutting down on your food consumption lead to a net improvement in nutritional intake? A panel data approach using data from the UK Biobank.减少食物摄入量会导致营养摄入的净改善吗?利用英国生物银行数据的面板数据方法。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 17;23(1):2274. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17217-y.
2
Creating healthy food environments in recreation and sport settings using choice architecture: a scoping review.利用选择架构在娱乐和体育场所创建健康的食物环境:范围综述。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Oct 1;38(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad098.
3
Evaluation of the introduction of a healthy food and drink policy in 13 community recreation centres on the healthiness and nutrient content of customer purchases and business outcomes: An observational study.

本文引用的文献

1
Change in non-alcoholic beverage sales following a 10-pence levy on sugar-sweetened beverages within a national chain of restaurants in the UK: interrupted time series analysis of a natural experiment.英国全国连锁餐厅对含糖饮料征收 10 便士税之后非酒精饮料销售变化:自然实验中断时间序列分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Nov;71(11):1107-1112. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209947.
2
Health impact assessment of the UK soft drinks industry levy: a comparative risk assessment modelling study.英国软饮料行业征税的健康影响评估:一项比较风险评估建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2016 Dec 16;2(1):e15-e22. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30037-8. eCollection 2017 Jan.
3
评估在 13 个社区娱乐中心引入健康食品和饮料政策对顾客购买的健康和营养成分以及商业成果的影响:一项观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 19;18(7):e0288719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288719. eCollection 2023.
4
Outcomes Following Taxation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.对含糖饮料征税的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2215276. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15276.
5
Environmental Interventions to Reduce the Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Abridged Cochrane Systematic Review.环境干预措施减少含糖饮料消费:简化 Cochrane 系统评价。
Obes Facts. 2020;13(4):397-417. doi: 10.1159/000508843. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
6
Change in drink purchases in 16 Australian recreation centres following a sugar-sweetened beverage reduction initiative: an observational study.在澳大利亚 16 个娱乐中心实施减少含糖饮料的倡议后,饮料购买量的变化:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 4;10(3):e029492. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029492.
7
Impact of the announcement and implementation of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy on sugar content, price, product size and number of available soft drinks in the UK, 2015-19: A controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国软饮料行业征税的宣布和实施对英国 2015-19 年软饮料的含糖量、价格、产品规格和种类的影响:一项基于控制的中断时间序列分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Feb 11;17(2):e1003025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003025. eCollection 2020 Feb.
8
The Relationship between Self-Reported Exposure to Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Promotions and Intake: Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 2017 International Food Policy Study.自我报告的含糖饮料促销活动暴露与摄入量之间的关系:2017 年国际粮食政策研究的横断面分析。
Nutrients. 2019 Dec 13;11(12):3047. doi: 10.3390/nu11123047.
9
Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health.减少含糖饮料消费的环境干预措施及其对健康的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012292.pub2.
The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health.
公共卫生证据的复杂系统模型的必要性。
Lancet. 2017 Dec 9;390(10112):2602-2604. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31267-9. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
4
Price elasticity of the demand for soft drinks, other sugar-sweetened beverages and energy dense food in Chile.智利软饮料、其他含糖饮料和高能量食品需求的价格弹性。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 10;17(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4098-x.
5
Health Promotion and Healthier Products Increase Vending Purchases: A Randomized Factorial Trial.健康促进与更健康的产品增加自动售货机购买量:一项随机析因试验
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Jul;117(7):1057-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
6
Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study.墨西哥对含糖甜味饮料征收消费税情况下商店饮料购买情况的观察性研究。
BMJ. 2016 Jan 6;352:h6704. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6704.
7
Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction.含糖饮料、人工甜味剂饮料和果汁的摄入与2型糖尿病发病率:系统评价、荟萃分析及人群归因分数估计
BMJ. 2015 Jul 21;351:h3576. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3576.
8
Estimated Global, Regional, and National Disease Burdens Related to Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption in 2010.2010年与含糖饮料消费相关的全球、区域和国家疾病负担估计
Circulation. 2015 Aug 25;132(8):639-66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010636. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
9
Association between sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened soft drinks and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.含糖及人工甜味软饮料与2型糖尿病之间的关联:前瞻性研究的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析
Br J Nutr. 2014 Sep 14;112(5):725-34. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514001329. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
10
Why fat taxes won't make us thin.为什么脂肪税不能让我们变瘦。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Mar;37(1):18-23. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu032. Epub 2014 May 22.