• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在经肛门微创手术(TAMIS)中对良性直肠病变进行部分厚度切除且不进行缺损缝合是否安全?

Is partial thickness excision in TAMIS without defect suture safe for benign rectal lesions?

作者信息

Kilic Ali, Sisik Abdullah

出版信息

Ann Ital Chir. 2018;89:177-181.

PMID:29848818
Abstract

BACKGROUND

One of the minimally invasive methods used in the surgical treatment of large-based polypoid lesions located in the rectum is transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). This method, which relieves patients from the severe morbidities of invasive surgical procedures, is performed in both malign (T1-T2) and benign lesions. Difficulty of suturation after TAMIS emerges as the most important factor to prolong the procedure. We aimed to analyse the efficacy of TAMIS procedure with partial thickness resection without suturation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study. The study was conducted in a Turkish Education and Research Hospital in 2016. Data of 10 patients who diagnosed with benign rectal masses were included in the study. Patients who were suspected for muscularis propria invasion and lymph node positivity in magnetic resonance imaging preoperatively excluded from the study. All lesions were resected with TAMIS and the mucosal defects were not closed in any patients. Demographic features, lesion's distances to anal verge, excised lesion's size, histopathological report, operation times, duration of hospital stay and complications were recorded RESULTS: Six male and 4 female patients were treated. The mean distance to the anal werge of the lesions was 8.5 (5-12) cm. The longest diameters of the lesions ranged from 1-4 cm in length. All the patients were discharged the day after the surgery. Operation times were found to be 46.1 ± 5 min (30-70). Histopathological examinations of the removed lesions revealed villous adenomas in 3 patients, villous adenoma and Tis adenocarcinoma in 5 patients, villous adenoma and T1 adenocarcinoma in 1 patient and neuroendocrine tumor in 1 patient. There were no early complications such as bleeding, and late complications such as perforation, anal incontinence or anorectal dysfunction in any patient. No evidence of recurrence was found in any of the patients under control rectosigmoidoscopy and pelvic MRI examinations.

CONCLUSION

Partial thickness resection of rectal benign lesions by TAMIS method is safe. After resection some surgeons suggest to close the defect by suture or stapler. In our study resection without closure of the defect is found safe and feasible with limited patient prejudice.

KEY WORDS

Rectal benign lesions, Transanal partial thickness excision.

摘要

背景

经肛门微创手术(TAMIS)是用于治疗直肠广基息肉样病变的微创手术方法之一。该方法可使患者免于侵入性手术的严重并发症,可用于治疗恶性(T1-T2)和良性病变。TAMIS术后缝合困难是延长手术时间的最重要因素。我们旨在分析不缝合的部分厚度切除术在TAMIS手术中的疗效。

材料与方法

这是一项回顾性研究。该研究于2016年在一家土耳其教育和研究医院进行。研究纳入了10例诊断为直肠良性肿物的患者。术前磁共振成像怀疑有肌层浸润和淋巴结阳性的患者被排除在研究之外。所有病变均采用TAMIS切除,所有患者的黏膜缺损均未封闭。记录患者的人口统计学特征、病变距肛缘的距离、切除病变的大小、组织病理学报告、手术时间、住院时间和并发症。

结果

治疗了6例男性和4例女性患者。病变距肛缘的平均距离为8.5(5-12)cm。病变的最长直径为1-4 cm。所有患者均在术后第一天出院。手术时间为46.1±5分钟(30-70分钟)。切除病变的组织病理学检查显示,3例患者为绒毛状腺瘤,5例患者为绒毛状腺瘤和Tis腺癌,1例患者为绒毛状腺瘤和T1腺癌,1例患者为神经内分泌肿瘤。所有患者均未出现出血等早期并发症,也未出现穿孔、肛门失禁或肛门直肠功能障碍等晚期并发症。在直肠乙状结肠镜检查和盆腔MRI检查中,未发现任何患者有复发迹象。

结论

采用TAMIS方法对直肠良性病变进行部分厚度切除是安全的。切除后,一些外科医生建议用缝线或吻合器封闭缺损。在我们的研究中,不封闭缺损的切除被发现是安全可行的,对患者的不利影响有限。

关键词

直肠良性病变;经肛门部分厚度切除术

相似文献

1
Is partial thickness excision in TAMIS without defect suture safe for benign rectal lesions?在经肛门微创手术(TAMIS)中对良性直肠病变进行部分厚度切除且不进行缺损缝合是否安全?
Ann Ital Chir. 2018;89:177-181.
2
Transanal minimal invasive surgery for rectal lesions: should the defect be closed?经肛门微创手术治疗直肠病变:缺损是否应闭合?
Colorectal Dis. 2015 May;17(5):397-402. doi: 10.1111/codi.12866.
3
Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): Standardizing a Reproducible Procedure.经肛门微创手术(TAMIS):规范一种可重复操作的手术方法。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Aug;19(8):1528-36. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2858-4. Epub 2015 May 28.
4
Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) in Qatar: initial experience.卡塔尔的经肛门微创手术(TAMIS):初步经验。
BMC Surg. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00797-6.
5
Evaluation of Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Benign Lesions.经肛门微创手术治疗直肠良性病变的评估
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Nov;30(11):1160-1164. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0087. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
6
Transanal single-port microsurgery for rectal tumors: minimal invasive surgery under spinal anesthesia.经肛门单孔微创手术治疗直肠肿瘤:椎管内麻醉下的微创手术。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):271-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3184-0. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
7
[A comparison of colonoscopy - assisted transanal minimally invasive surgery via glove port and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of early rectal tumors].[经手套端口结肠镜辅助经肛门微创手术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期直肠肿瘤的比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 25;22(7):656-661. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.07.010.
8
McKittrick Wheelock Syndrome Treated by Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature.经肛门微创手术治疗麦基特里克-惠洛克综合征:单中心经验及文献综述
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Feb;28(2):204-208. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0195. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
9
Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution.经肛门内镜下切除并进入腹腔:需谨慎对待。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1816-25. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4452-y. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
10
Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Lesions.经肛门微创手术治疗直肠病变
JSLS. 2016 Jul-Sep;20(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00032.