Zhao Suhong, Guo Weihua, Tan Ru, Chen Peipei, Li Zhaohua, Sun Fengguo, Shao Guangrui
Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250033, P.R. China.
Department of Radiology, Provincial Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, P.R. China.
Oncol Lett. 2018 May;15(5):8134-8140. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8343. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
The present study aimed to investigate the correlation between the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and the histological grade of breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). In total, 129 pathologically verified lesions that were subjected to dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion weighted imaging prior to biopsy were included. The ADC value was calculated and its correlation with the tumor histological grade was investigated. Tumors of lower grades demonstrated significantly higher ADC values as compared with tumors of higher grades (F=33.49; P<0.01). The mean ADC values for IDC of grades I, II and III were (1.14±0.11)×10, (0.99±0.12)×10 and (0.86±0.13)×10 mm/sec, respectively. Statistically significant differences were detected in the mean ADC value between tumors of grades II and III (P<0.01), as well as between tumors of grades I and II (P<0.01). In addition, the mean ADC values for the less aggressive (grades I and II) and more aggressive (grade III) groups were (1.01±0.13)×10 and (0.86±0.13)×10 mm/sec, respectively (t=5.76, P<0.01). In conclusion, these data indicated that the ADC value was correlated with the IDC histological grade, and lower ADC values were associated with a higher histological grade and more aggressiveness. Thus, the ADC value may be considered as a promising prognostic parameter in identifying tumor aggressiveness.
本研究旨在探讨乳腺浸润性导管癌(IDC)的最小表观扩散系数(ADC)值与组织学分级之间的相关性。总共纳入了129例经病理证实的病变,这些病变在活检前接受了乳腺动态磁共振成像和扩散加权成像。计算ADC值,并研究其与肿瘤组织学分级的相关性。与高分级肿瘤相比,低分级肿瘤的ADC值显著更高(F = 33.49;P < 0.01)。I级、II级和III级IDC的平均ADC值分别为(1.14±0.11)×10、(0.99±0.12)×10和(0.86±0.13)×10 mm/sec。在II级和III级肿瘤之间以及I级和II级肿瘤之间的平均ADC值检测到统计学显著差异(P < 0.01)。此外,侵袭性较低(I级和II级)和侵袭性较高(III级)组的平均ADC值分别为(1.01±0.13)×10和(0.86±0.13)×10 mm/sec(t = 5.76,P < 0.01)。总之,这些数据表明ADC值与IDC组织学分级相关,较低的ADC值与较高的组织学分级和更强的侵袭性相关。因此,ADC值可被视为识别肿瘤侵袭性的一个有前景的预后参数。