• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过3.0特斯拉磁共振成像获得的定量表观扩散系数测量作为乳腺癌肿瘤侵袭性的潜在无创标志物。

Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurement obtained by 3.0Tesla MRI as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer.

作者信息

Durando Manuela, Gennaro Lucas, Cho Gene Y, Giri Dilip D, Gnanasigamani Merlin M, Patil Sujata, Sutton Elizabeth J, Deasy Joseph O, Morris Elizabeth A, Thakur Sunitha B

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, A. O. U. Città della Salute e della Scienza of Turin, 10126, Italy.

Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East, 66th street, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2016 Sep;85(9):1651-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.06.019
PMID:27501902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5505563/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the association between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and histological prognostic parameters in malignant breast lesions. The ability of ADC to identify lesions with the presence of Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in breast carcinoma was also examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This HIPAA-compliant retrospective study consisted of 212 consecutive patients with known cancers who underwent 3.0T MRI between January 2011 and 2013. In this study, a total of 126 malignant lesions in 114 women, who had undergone DWI (b-values of 0 and 1000s/mm(2)) in addition to diagnostic MRI, were included. Patients with less than 0.8cm lesions, or those who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy or suboptimal DW images were excluded. Classical prognostic factors [lesion size, histopathological type and grade, lymph node (LN) status and lymphovascular invasion (LVI)], molecular prognostic markers [estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal grow factor receptor 2 (HER2)] were reviewed and recorded. A region of interest (ROI) was drawn within the lesions to measure ADC values. Statistical analyses were performed by the Wilcoxon rank sum test (statistical significance at P<0.05). Adjusted p values from multiple comparison analysis were also calculated.

RESULTS

This study demonstrates an inverse correlation between ADC and LVI in malignant lesions and the ability of ADC to identify aggressiveness in lesions with positive LVI. Tumor size, grade, ER, PR, HER2 and lymph node status did not impact tumor ADC value. However, tumors with LVI showed significantly lower ADC values when compared to tumors without LVI, regardless of the enhancement type, histological grade, histological type, and LN status.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that ADC could be a potential clinical adjunct in the evaluation of prognostic factors related to malignant lesion aggressiveness such as LVI.

摘要

目的

评估表观扩散系数(ADC)与恶性乳腺病变组织学预后参数之间的相关性。同时研究ADC鉴别乳腺癌中存在淋巴管侵犯(LVI)病变的能力。

材料与方法

这项符合健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)的回顾性研究纳入了2011年1月至2013年期间连续212例已知患有癌症且接受了3.0T磁共振成像(MRI)检查的患者。本研究共纳入了114名女性的126个恶性病变,这些患者除了接受诊断性MRI检查外,还进行了扩散加权成像(DWI,b值为0和1000s/mm²)。排除病变小于0.8cm的患者,或接受过新辅助化疗的患者,或扩散加权图像质量欠佳的患者。回顾并记录了经典预后因素[病变大小、组织病理学类型和分级、淋巴结(LN)状态和淋巴管侵犯(LVI)]、分子预后标志物[雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)和人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)]。在病变内绘制感兴趣区(ROI)以测量ADC值。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验进行统计分析(P<0.05具有统计学意义)。还计算了多重比较分析的校正P值。

结果

本研究表明,恶性病变中ADC与LVI呈负相关,且ADC具有鉴别LVI阳性病变侵袭性的能力。肿瘤大小、分级、ER、PR、HER2和淋巴结状态不影响肿瘤ADC值。然而,无论增强类型、组织学分级、组织学类型和LN状态如何,有LVI的肿瘤与无LVI的肿瘤相比,ADC值显著更低。

结论

我们的研究表明,ADC可能是评估与恶性病变侵袭性相关的预后因素(如LVI)的一种潜在临床辅助手段。

相似文献

1
Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurement obtained by 3.0Tesla MRI as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer.通过3.0特斯拉磁共振成像获得的定量表观扩散系数测量作为乳腺癌肿瘤侵袭性的潜在无创标志物。
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Sep;85(9):1651-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
2
Apparent diffusion coefficient in estrogen receptor-positive and lymph node-negative invasive breast cancers at 3.0T DW-MRI: A potential predictor for an oncotype Dx test recurrence score.在 3.0T 弥散加权磁共振成像中,雌激素受体阳性且淋巴结阴性的浸润性乳腺癌的表观扩散系数:一种用于预测 Oncotype DX 试验复发评分的潜在指标。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Feb;47(2):401-409. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25796. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
3
Can Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Related Apparent Diffusion Coefficient be a Prognostic Value in Women With Breast Cancer?扩散加权成像及相关表观扩散系数能否作为乳腺癌女性患者的预后指标?
Cancer Invest. 2017 Feb 7;35(2):92-99. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2016.1267740. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
4
Is there any relationship between adc values of diffusion-weighted imaging and the histopathological prognostic factors of invasive ductal carcinoma?扩散加权成像的表观扩散系数值与浸润性导管癌的组织病理学预后因素之间是否存在关联?
Br J Radiol. 2018 Apr;91(1084):20170705. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170705. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
5
Role of diffusion-weighted MRI: predicting axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer.扩散加权磁共振成像的作用:预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移
Acta Radiol. 2014 Oct;55(8):909-16. doi: 10.1177/0284185113509094. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
6
Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0t: Correlation with prognostic factors and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma.3.0T下表观扩散系数的直方图分析:与浸润性导管癌预后因素及亚型的相关性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Dec;42(6):1666-78. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24934. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
7
Predicting metastasis in clinically negative axillary lymph nodes with minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value in luminal A-like breast cancer.在管腔 A 样乳腺癌中,最小表观扩散系数值预测临床阴性腋窝淋巴结转移。
Breast Cancer. 2019 Sep;26(5):628-636. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00969-0. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
8
Preoperative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings for Prediction of Lymphovascular Invasion of the Lesions in Node-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer.术前动态对比增强及弥散加权磁共振成像对预测淋巴结阴性乳腺癌病灶中淋巴管侵犯的价值。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2024 May;75(2):386-396. doi: 10.1177/08465371231212893. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
9
Minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting lymphovascular invasion in invasive cervical cancer.预测浸润性宫颈癌淋巴管浸润的最小表观扩散系数
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Jun;45(6):1771-1779. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25542. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
10
Diagnostic Usefulness of Combination of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and T2WI, Including Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Breast Lesions: Assessment of Histologic Grade.弥散加权成像与 T2WI 联合应用,包括表观扩散系数在乳腺病变中的诊断价值:对组织学分级的评估。
Acad Radiol. 2018 May;25(5):643-652. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.11.011. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast Imaging: Correlation Between Axillary Lymph Nodes Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Pathological Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer.乳腺影像检查:浸润性乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结表观扩散系数与病理淋巴管浸润之间的相关性
Eur J Breast Health. 2025 Mar 25;21(2):141-153. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2024-10-4. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
Breast Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Current Applications, Insights from Screening, and Future Directions.乳腺扩散加权磁共振成像:当前应用、筛查见解及未来方向。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2025 Jul 1;24(3):300-314. doi: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2024-0142. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Peritumoral apparent diffusion coefficients for prediction of lymphovascular invasion in clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer.临床淋巴结阴性浸润性乳腺癌中瘤周表观弥散系数预测淋巴管血管侵犯的价值
Eur Radiol. 2016 Feb;26(2):331-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3847-4. Epub 2015 May 30.
2
Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: morphology, biomarkers and 'omics.乳腺浸润性小叶癌:形态学、生物标志物与“组学”
Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Jan 30;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0519-x.
3
Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for the differentiation of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ.
Multimodal apparent diffusion MRI model in noninvasive evaluation of breast cancer and Ki-67 expression.
多模态表观扩散 MRI 模型在无创评估乳腺癌及 Ki-67 表达中的应用。
Cancer Imaging. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00780-x.
4
Non-contrast Breast MR Imaging.乳腺非增强磁共振成像
Radiol Clin North Am. 2024 Jul;62(4):661-678. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.12.009. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
5
Longitudinal diffusion and volumetric kinetics of head and neck cancer magnetic resonance on a 1.5T MR-Linear accelerator hybrid system: A prospective R-IDEAL Stage 2a imaging biomarker characterization/ pre-qualification study.1.5T磁共振线性加速器混合系统上头颈癌磁共振的纵向扩散与容积动力学:一项前瞻性R-IDEAL 2a期成像生物标志物表征/预鉴定研究。
medRxiv. 2023 May 5:2023.05.04.23289527. doi: 10.1101/2023.05.04.23289527.
6
Histogram analysis of breast diffusion kurtosis imaging: a comparison between readout-segmented and single-shot echo-planar imaging sequence.乳腺扩散峰度成像的直方图分析:读出分段与单次激发回波平面成像序列的比较
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Feb 1;13(2):735-746. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-475. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
7
Evaluation of pretreatment ADC values as predictors of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer - a multicenter study.评估 ADC 值作为预测乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗治疗反应的指标 - 一项多中心研究。
Cancer Imaging. 2022 Dec 9;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40644-022-00501-2.
8
Quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to predict lymphovascular invasion and survival outcome in breast cancer.动态对比增强磁共振成像定量参数预测乳腺癌淋巴管血管侵犯及生存预后。
Cancer Imaging. 2022 Oct 22;22(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40644-022-00499-7.
9
Breast Cancer Subtypes and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systemic Review.乳腺癌亚型与定量磁共振成像:一项系统综述
Life (Basel). 2022 Mar 28;12(4):490. doi: 10.3390/life12040490.
10
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Different Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.不同乳腺癌分子亚型的扩散加权成像:系统评价与荟萃分析
Breast Care (Basel). 2022 Feb;17(1):47-54. doi: 10.1159/000514407. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
定量表观扩散系数作为鉴别浸润性乳腺癌和原位导管癌的非侵入性成像生物标志物。
Invest Radiol. 2015 Feb;50(2):95-100. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000104.
4
Diffusion-weighted imaging in cancer: physical foundations and applications of restriction spectrum imaging.扩散加权成像在癌症中的应用:限制谱成像的物理基础及其应用。
Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 1;74(17):4638-52. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3534.
5
Tumor characteristics of breast cancer in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis.乳腺癌的肿瘤特征在预测腋窝淋巴结转移中的作用
Med Sci Monit. 2014 Jul 7;20:1155-61. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890491.
6
Diffusion-weighted imaging: determination of the best pair of b-values to discriminate breast lesions.扩散加权成像:确定用于鉴别乳腺病变的最佳b值对。
Br J Radiol. 2014 Jul;87(1039):20130807. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130807. Epub 2014 May 16.
7
Diagnostic and prognostic value of pretreatment SUV in 18F-FDG/PET in breast cancer: comparison with apparent diffusion coefficient from diffusion-weighted MR imaging.18F-FDG/PET中治疗前SUV对乳腺癌的诊断和预后价值:与扩散加权磁共振成像的表观扩散系数比较
J Nucl Med. 2014 May;55(5):736-42. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.129395. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
8
Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla.3.0特斯拉磁共振扩散加权成像中浸润性导管癌表观扩散系数值与病理因素的相关性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jan;41(1):175-82. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24519. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
9
Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 T differentiates malignant breast lesions from benign lesions and breast parenchyma.3.0T体素内不相干运动扩散加权磁共振成像可鉴别乳腺恶性病变与良性病变及乳腺实质。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Oct;40(4):813-23. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24462. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
10
Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values and prognostic factors of breast cancer.表观扩散系数值与乳腺癌预后因素的相关性。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2013;12(3):193-9. doi: 10.2463/mrms.2012-0095. Epub 2013 Jul 12.