• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断喉咽反流病时,不同性别的反流发现评分应采用不同的临界值。

Different cutoffs of the reflux finding score for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux disease should be used for different genders.

作者信息

Gao Cheng-Kai, Li Yan-Fei, Wang Lu, Han Xiao-Yan, Wu Ting, Zeng Fang-Fang, Li Xiang-Ping

机构信息

a Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery , Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital , Guangzhou , Guangdong , China.

出版信息

Acta Otolaryngol. 2018 Sep;138(9):848-854. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1473642. Epub 2018 May 31.

DOI:10.1080/00016489.2018.1473642
PMID:29852801
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the differences in Reflux Finding Score (RFS) between the genders and determine the suitable RFS threshold for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) in each gender.

METHODS

Asymptomatic volunteers and patients with LPRD, confirmed with an oropharyngeal Dx-pH monitoring system, were included. All study subjects underwent transnasal flexible fiber-optic video laryngoscopy. Reliability was assessed with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. The RFS cutoffs for determining the presence and absence of LPRD between the two genders were examined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred seven asymptomatic volunteers and fifty-five LPRD patients were recruited. The mean RFS for LPRD subjects (9.4 ± 3.2) was significantly higher than that for control subjects (7.1 ± 2.6; p < 0.001). The mean RFS for asymptomatic females (6.1 ± 2.7) was significantly lower than that for males (7.7 ± 2.5; p < 0.001). The mean RFS for female subjects with LPRD (7.8 ± 2.6) was lower than that for males (11.0 ± 2.8; p < 0.001). According to ROC analysis, the best cutoffs were 9.0 for males and 6.0 for females.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant difference in the RFS cutoff between the genders. For male subjects, we recommend a cutoff of 9.0 for diagnosing LPRD, and for female subjects, we recommend a cutoff of 6.0.

摘要

目的

评估反流发现评分(RFS)在不同性别之间的差异,并确定每种性别中诊断喉咽反流病(LPRD)的合适RFS阈值。

方法

纳入无症状志愿者和经口咽Dx-pH监测系统确诊的LPRD患者。所有研究对象均接受经鼻柔性纤维光学视频喉镜检查。通过组内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman图评估可靠性。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)分析检查两种性别之间确定LPRD存在与否的RFS临界值。

结果

招募了107名无症状志愿者和55名LPRD患者。LPRD受试者的平均RFS(9.4±3.2)显著高于对照组受试者(7.1±2.6;p<0.001)。无症状女性的平均RFS(6.1±2.7)显著低于男性(7.7±2.5;p<0.001)。LPRD女性受试者的平均RFS(7.8±2.6)低于男性(11.0±2.8;p<0.001)。根据ROC分析,最佳临界值男性为9.0,女性为6.0。

结论

不同性别之间的RFS临界值存在显著差异。对于男性受试者,我们建议诊断LPRD的临界值为9.0,对于女性受试者,我们建议临界值为6.0。

相似文献

1
Different cutoffs of the reflux finding score for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux disease should be used for different genders.诊断喉咽反流病时,不同性别的反流发现评分应采用不同的临界值。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2018 Sep;138(9):848-854. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1473642. Epub 2018 May 31.
2
[Correlation analysis between Dx-pH monitoring and proton pump inhibitor test in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].[Dx-pH监测与质子泵抑制剂试验在喉咽反流性疾病诊断中的相关性分析]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jan 7;55(1):34-39. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2020.01.007.
3
Utility of 24-hour pharyngeal pH monitoring and clinical feature in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.24小时咽pH监测在喉咽反流病中的应用及临床特征
Acta Otolaryngol. 2019 Mar;139(3):299-303. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1571280.
4
Relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease based on synchronous esophageal and oropharyngeal Dx-pH monitoring.基于同步食管和咽部 Dx-pH 监测的喉咽反流病与胃食管反流病的关系。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 May-Jun;41(3):102441. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102441. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
5
Expression of CAIII and Hsp70 Is Increased the Mucous Membrane of the Posterior Commissure in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.CAIII和Hsp70在喉咽反流病后联合黏膜中的表达增加。
Yonsei Med J. 2016 Mar;57(2):469-74. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.469.
6
Comparison of Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) with Reflux Finding Score (RFS) and Its Effectiveness in Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease (LPRD).反流症状指数(RSI)与反流发现评分(RFS)的比较及其在喉咽反流病(LPRD)诊断中的有效性
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):1809-1813. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01814-z. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
7
[The correlation between gastric bubble size and laryngopharyngeal reflux pattern in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].[喉咽反流病患者胃泡大小与喉咽反流模式之间的相关性]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Nov 26;99(44):3487-3493. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.44.008.
8
LPR: how different diagnostic tools shape the outcomes of treatment.喉咽反流:不同诊断工具如何影响治疗结果
J Voice. 2014 May;28(3):362-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.12.004. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
9
[Effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease on the clinical characteristics of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].[胃食管反流病对喉咽反流病患者临床特征的影响]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 7;57(10):1178-1184. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20220525-00302.
10
Association between laryngopharyngeal reflux disease and autonomic nerve dysfunction.喉咽反流病与自主神经功能障碍的关系。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Aug;276(8):2283-2287. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05482-w. Epub 2019 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
[The application progress on diagnostic scales of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].[喉咽反流疾病诊断量表的应用进展]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Apr;37(4):313-317. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.04.016.