Han Yue, Zhang Sen, Huangfu Hui, Liu Chenyang, Yan Chenxu
The First Clinical College of Shanxi Medical University;Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University,Taiyuan,030001,China.
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Apr;37(4):313-317. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.04.016.
At present, objective methods for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux disease(LPRD) are not minimally invasive, effective, and economical. Diagnostic scales are widely used worldwide due to the advantages of inexpensive, noninvasive, and easy to operate. The reflux symptom index(RSI) and the reflux finding score(RFS) are preferred to use in clinical diagnosis. However, many controversies have appeared in the application of RSI and RFS in recent years, causing many troubles to clinical diagnosis. Therefore, this review briefly discusses the problems of RSI and RFS in clinical applications to provide reference for diagnosing LPRD accurately.
目前,用于诊断喉咽反流病(LPRD)的客观方法并非微创、有效且经济。诊断量表因价格低廉、无创且易于操作的优点而在全球广泛使用。反流症状指数(RSI)和反流发现评分(RFS)在临床诊断中更受青睐。然而,近年来RSI和RFS在应用中出现了许多争议,给临床诊断带来诸多困扰。因此,本综述简要讨论RSI和RFS在临床应用中的问题,为准确诊断LPRD提供参考。