1Department of Child,Youth and Family Studies,University of Nebraska-Lincoln,135 Home Economics Building,Lincoln,NE 68588-0236,USA.
2HighScope Educational Research Foundation,Ypsilanti,MI, USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Sep;21(13):2351-2359. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001416. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
To determine if family childcare homes (FCCH) in Nebraska meet best practices for nutrition and screen time, and if focusing on nutrition and screen time policies and practices improves the FCCH environment.
A pre-post evaluation was conducted using the Go Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Childcare (Go NAP SACC).
FCCH in Nebraska, USA.
FCCH enrolled in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP; n 208) participated in a pre-post evaluation using Go NAP SACC.
At baseline, all FCCH met the minimum childcare standards for fifty-four of fifty-six practices in nutrition and screen time. After the intervention, FCCH demonstrated significant improvement in fourteen of the forty-four Child Nutrition items and eleven of the twelve Screen Time items. However, FCCH providers did not meet best practices at post-intervention. Lowest scores were found in serving meals family-style, promoting visible support for healthy eating, planned nutrition education and written policy on child nutrition. For screen time, lowest scores were reported on the availability of television, offering families education on screen time and having a written policy on screen time.
FCCH in Nebraska were able to strengthen their policies and practices after utilizing Go NAP SACC. Continued professional development and participation in targeted interventions may assist programmes in sustaining improved practices and policies. Considering the varying standards and policies surrounding FCCH, future studies comparing the current findings with childcare centres and non-CACFP programmes are warranted.
确定内布拉斯加州家庭日托中心(FCCH)是否符合营养和屏幕时间的最佳实践标准,以及关注营养和屏幕时间政策和实践是否能改善 FCCH 环境。
使用儿童和成人护理食品计划(CACFP;n=208)的 Go 营养和体育活动自我评估(Go NAP SACC)进行了前后评估。
美国内布拉斯加州的 FCCH。
参加 Go NAP SACC 前后评估的 FCCH。
在基线时,所有 FCCH 在营养和屏幕时间的五十六项实践中均符合五十四项最低儿童保育标准。干预后,FCCH 在儿童营养的四十四个项目中的十四个和屏幕时间的十二个项目中的十一个方面显示出显著改善。然而,FCCH 提供者在干预后并未达到最佳实践标准。在提供家庭式膳食、促进对健康饮食的可见支持、计划营养教育和制定儿童营养书面政策方面得分最低。在屏幕时间方面,得分最低的是电视的可用性、为家庭提供关于屏幕时间的教育以及制定关于屏幕时间的书面政策。
内布拉斯加州的 FCCH 在使用 Go NAP SACC 后能够加强其政策和实践。持续的专业发展和参与有针对性的干预措施可能有助于方案维持改进的实践和政策。考虑到 FCCH 周围不同的标准和政策,未来的研究将当前的发现与日托中心和非 CACFP 方案进行比较是有必要的。