• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙周健康与依从性:Essix 和 Hawley 保持器的比较。

Periodontal health and compliance: A comparison between Essix and Hawley retainers.

机构信息

Dental School, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.

Dental School, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Jun;153(6):852-860. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.10.025.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.10.025
PMID:29853243
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Many studies on removable retainers have focused on retention efficacy and characteristics. However, studies on plaque accumulation, periodontal health, breakages, and patient compliance are still lacking. Thus, in this study, we aimed at evaluating these parameters in 2 groups of young patients wearing Essix or Hawley retainers for a 6-month period.

METHODS

Seventy subjects were included. Periodontal health was investigated by measuring the plaque, gingival, calculus, and bleeding on probing indexes. Evaluations were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months of wearing. Accumulation of plaque on the retainers was also evaluated. Furthermore, compliance on wearing retainers and breakage data were collected by specific questionnaires.

RESULTS

Subjects wearing Essix retainers had significantly higher levels of plaque, gingival, and calculus indexes and increased percentages of bleeding sites, compared with subjects wearing Hawley retainers. The Essix group also had increased accumulations of plaque and calculus on the retainers. Nonetheless, subjects of the Essix group had better overall experiences, self-perceptions, and comfort compared with those of the Hawley group. Essix retainers had higher incidences of little and serious breakages compared with Hawley retainers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that Essix retainers are well accepted by patients for their esthetic and oral comfort characteristics. However, Essix retainers may cause greater accumulations of plaque on both teeth and retainers, presumably because of inhibition of the cleaning effect of saliva caused by the thermoplastic material or the reduced opportunity for good hygiene on the retainer.

摘要

简介

许多关于可摘保持器的研究都集中在保持效果和特点上。然而,关于菌斑积累、牙周健康、破损和患者依从性的研究仍然缺乏。因此,在这项研究中,我们旨在评估两组年轻患者在佩戴 Essix 或 Hawley 保持器 6 个月期间的这些参数。

方法

共纳入 70 名受试者。通过测量菌斑、牙龈、牙石和探诊出血指数来评估牙周健康。在佩戴后的 1、3 和 6 个月进行评估。还评估了保持器上菌斑的积累情况。此外,通过专门的问卷收集了佩戴保持器的依从性和破损数据。

结果

与佩戴 Hawley 保持器的受试者相比,佩戴 Essix 保持器的受试者菌斑、牙龈和牙石指数明显更高,探诊出血位点的百分比增加。Essix 组保持器上的菌斑和牙石也有更多的积累。然而,与 Hawley 组相比,Essix 组的受试者总体体验、自我认知和舒适度更好。与 Hawley 保持器相比,Essix 保持器的小破损和严重破损发生率更高。

结论

我们的结果表明,Essix 保持器因其美观和口腔舒适的特点而被患者接受。然而,Essix 保持器可能会导致牙齿和保持器上更大量的菌斑积累,这可能是由于热塑性材料抑制了唾液的清洁效果,或者保持器上的良好卫生机会减少。

相似文献

1
Periodontal health and compliance: A comparison between Essix and Hawley retainers.牙周健康与依从性:Essix 和 Hawley 保持器的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Jun;153(6):852-860. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.10.025.
2
Comparing the effects of Essix and Hawley retainers on the acoustics of speech.比较Essix保持器和霍利保持器对语音声学的影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Aug 1;39(4):440-445. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw050.
3
Comparative evaluation of salivary microbial levels and periodontal status of patients wearing fixed and removable orthodontic retainers.比较固定和可摘正畸保持器佩戴者的唾液微生物水平和牙周状况。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Aug;156(2):186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.08.022.
4
Environmental sustainability of post-orthodontic dental retainers: a comparative life-cycle assessment of Hawley and Essix retainers.正畸后保持器的环境可持续性:Hawley 和 Essix 保持器的比较生命周期评估。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Apr 1;46(2). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae012.
5
Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.正畸成年患者中霍利保持器与真空成型保持器的可接受性比较:一项单中心随机对照试验
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Aug 1;39(4):453-461. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx024.
6
Effects of different orthodontic retention protocols on the periodontal health of mandibular incisors.不同正畸保持方案对下颌切牙牙周健康的影响。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2016 Nov;19(4):198-208. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12129. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
7
Periodontal implications of bonded versus removable retainers.粘结式与可摘式保持器对牙周的影响
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Dec;112(6):607-16. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70225-7.
8
Objective evaluation of compliance after orthodontic treatment using Hawley or vacuum-formed retainers: A 2-center randomized controlled trial over a 3-month period.使用 Hawley 保持器或真空成型保持器对正畸治疗后的依从性进行客观评估:一项为期 3 个月的双中心随机对照试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Dec;156(6):717-726.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.07.008.
9
Periodontal effects and survival rates of different mandibular retainers: comparison of bonding technique and wire thickness.不同下颌保持器的牙周效果和存活率:粘接技术和线径的比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2019 Nov 15;41(6):591-600. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz060.
10
Effectiveness and acceptability of Essix and Begg retainers: a prospective study.Essix矫治器和Begg矫治器的有效性与可接受性:一项前瞻性研究。
Aust Orthod J. 2011 May;27(1):52-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Invisible appliance promotes bone reconstruction via modulating the periodontal immune microenvironment.隐形矫治器通过调节牙周免疫微环境促进骨重建。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 May 12;30(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02503-9.
2
Outcome and barrier: the double-edged sword of the patient satisfaction dilemma.结果与障碍:患者满意度困境的双刃剑。
Angle Orthod. 2025 May 1;95(3):347-348. doi: 10.2319/ANGL-Guest_Editorial.1.
3
A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the Association between Orthodontic Treatment, Retention Modality and the Prevalence of Gingival Recession.
正畸治疗、保持方式与牙龈退缩患病率之间关联的横断面评估
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024 Dec 5;22:647-654. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b5871487.
4
An In Vivo Study to Compare the Clinical Effectiveness of Clear Retainer Made on a Conventional and a Digitally Fabricated Model Over a Six-Month Period After Debonding.一项体内研究,比较在传统模型和数字制造模型上制作的透明保持器在脱粘结后六个月期间的临床效果。
Cureus. 2024 Feb 23;16(2):e54740. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54740. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
"Comparing the effectiveness, acceptability and oral hygiene status between vacuum formed retainer and Begg's retainer": a pilot study.“比较真空成型保持器和 Begg 保持器的有效性、可接受性和口腔卫生状况”:一项初步研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 9;23(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03010-1.
6
A survey of patient compliance with removable orthodontic retainer wear in Brunei Darussalam.文莱达鲁萨兰国患者对可摘式正畸保持器佩戴依从性的调查。
BDJ Open. 2023 Mar 3;9(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s41405-023-00138-8.
7
Assessment of the Bacterial Loads of Vacuum-Thermoformed Removable Retainers (VTRR) in Patients under Retention Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.正畸保持治疗患者中真空热成型可摘保持器(VTRR)细菌载量的评估:一项随机临床试验。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 3;10(7):1239. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071239.
8
One-year comparative assessment of retention of arch width increases between modified vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers.改良型真空成型保持器和Hawley 保持器在保持牙弓宽度增加方面的一年比较评估。
Angle Orthod. 2022 Mar 1;92(2):197-203. doi: 10.2319/050921-363.1.
9
Assessment of the effect of vacuum-formed retainers and Hawley retainers on periodontal health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.评价真空成型保持器和哈雷保持器对牙周健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0253968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253968. eCollection 2021.
10
The Behavior of Two Types of Upper Removable Retainers-Our Clinical Experience.两种类型上颌可摘保持器的行为——我们的临床经验
Children (Basel). 2020 Dec 16;7(12):295. doi: 10.3390/children7120295.