• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种类型上颌可摘保持器的行为——我们的临床经验

The Behavior of Two Types of Upper Removable Retainers-Our Clinical Experience.

作者信息

Vaida Luminita Ligia, Bud Eugen Silviu, Halitchi Liliana Gabriela, Cavalu Simona, Todor Bianca Ioana, Negrutiu Bianca Maria, Moca Abel Emanuel, Bodog Florian Dorel

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1 Universitatii Str., 410087 Oradea, Romania.

Department of Orthodontics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Science and Technology G.E Palade, 38 Gh. Marinescu Str., 540139 Targu Mures, Romania.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2020 Dec 16;7(12):295. doi: 10.3390/children7120295.

DOI:10.3390/children7120295
PMID:33339121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7765545/
Abstract

The Hawley retainer (HR) and the vacuum-formed retainer (VFR) are the most common removable retainers in orthodontic treatments. The aim of this retrospective study was to comparatively analyze the behavior of two types of removable retainers-HRs and VFRs-in terms of retainer damage, loss, and the rate of installation of mild or severe relapse that required recourse to certain therapeutic interventions. The study was performed on 618 orthodontic patients aged 11-17 years, average age 13.98 ± 1.51, out of which 57% were patients having VFRs and the remaining 43% having HRs in the upper arch. We performed an analysis of the two groups of patients-HRs group and VFRs group-at 6 months (T1) and at 12 months (T2) after the application of the retainer. The results showed that 6% of all the retainers were damaged, mostly at T2 (54.1%). Seven percent of all the retainers were lost, mostly at T1 (58.1%). Of all the patients, 9.1% presented mild relapse, mostly at T1 (58.9%), while 2.6% presented severe relapse. The VFRs were significantly more frequently associated with the occurrence of damage than the HRs ( < 0.001). Severe relapse was more frequently associated with the HRs rather than with VFRs ( < 0.05).

摘要

霍利保持器(HR)和真空压膜保持器(VFR)是正畸治疗中最常见的可摘保持器。这项回顾性研究的目的是比较分析两种可摘保持器——HR和VFR——在保持器损坏、丢失以及需要采取某些治疗干预措施的轻度或重度复发发生率方面的表现。该研究针对618名年龄在11至17岁之间的正畸患者进行,平均年龄为13.98±1.51岁,其中57%的患者上颌使用VFR,其余43%的患者上颌使用HR。我们在佩戴保持器后的6个月(T1)和12个月(T2)对两组患者——HR组和VFR组——进行了分析。结果显示,所有保持器中有6%损坏,大部分发生在T2(54.1%)。所有保持器中有7%丢失,大部分发生在T1(58.1%)。在所有患者中,9.1%出现轻度复发,大部分发生在T1(58.9%),而2.6%出现重度复发。VFR与损坏发生的关联明显比HR更频繁(<0.001)。重度复发与HR的关联比与VFR更频繁(<0.05)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/495f1ac14e49/children-07-00295-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/eedb796499ea/children-07-00295-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/07ca5c9e81ab/children-07-00295-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/947f0c4ebc26/children-07-00295-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/87304e6856c7/children-07-00295-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/13784bc93673/children-07-00295-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/57f71ca9f405/children-07-00295-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/852410affd05/children-07-00295-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/363fbeb114be/children-07-00295-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/17d70f4d7f9f/children-07-00295-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/0f7dee5b2684/children-07-00295-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/d5571eb7d3bd/children-07-00295-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/495f1ac14e49/children-07-00295-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/eedb796499ea/children-07-00295-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/07ca5c9e81ab/children-07-00295-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/947f0c4ebc26/children-07-00295-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/87304e6856c7/children-07-00295-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/13784bc93673/children-07-00295-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/57f71ca9f405/children-07-00295-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/852410affd05/children-07-00295-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/363fbeb114be/children-07-00295-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/17d70f4d7f9f/children-07-00295-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/0f7dee5b2684/children-07-00295-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/d5571eb7d3bd/children-07-00295-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0475/7765545/495f1ac14e49/children-07-00295-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
The Behavior of Two Types of Upper Removable Retainers-Our Clinical Experience.两种类型上颌可摘保持器的行为——我们的临床经验
Children (Basel). 2020 Dec 16;7(12):295. doi: 10.3390/children7120295.
2
Can vacuum-formed retainers maintain arch dimensions and alignment compared to Hawley and fixed bonded retainers after treatment with fixed appliances? A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用固定矫治器治疗后,真空成型保持器与 Hawley 保持器和固定粘接保持器相比,能维持牙弓的尺寸和排列吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Oct 1;46(5). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae040.
3
Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months.粘结式与真空成型保持器:一项随机对照试验。第1部分:12个月后的稳定性、保持器留存率及患者满意度结果
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Jul 27;40(4):387-398. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx058.
4
[Clinical evaluation of lingual fixed retainer combined with Hawley retainer and vacuum-formed retainer].舌侧固定保持器联合霍利保持器及压膜保持器的临床评价
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2011 Dec;20(6):623-6.
5
Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.使用正畸矫治器治疗后稳定牙齿位置的保持程序。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 29;2016(1):CD002283. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub4.
6
Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.正畸成年患者中霍利保持器与真空成型保持器的可接受性比较:一项单中心随机对照试验
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Aug 1;39(4):453-461. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx024.
7
The retention characteristics of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers with different retention protocols.采用不同保持方案的霍利保持器和真空成型保持器的保持特性。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Mar 1;10(3):e224-e231. doi: 10.4317/jced.54511. eCollection 2018 Mar.
8
Comparison of Stability of the Results of Orthodontic Treatment and Gingival Health between Hawley and Vacuum-formed Retainers.霍利保持器与真空成型保持器在正畸治疗结果稳定性及牙龈健康方面的比较
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Apr 1;19(4):443-449.
9
Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.正畸治疗后稳定牙齿位置的保持程序。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 22;5(5):CD002283. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub5.
10
"Comparing the effectiveness, acceptability and oral hygiene status between vacuum formed retainer and Begg's retainer": a pilot study.“比较真空成型保持器和 Begg 保持器的有效性、可接受性和口腔卫生状况”:一项初步研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 9;23(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03010-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Marital Status, Education, and Family Size on Parental Behaviors Toward Early Childhood Caries in Romania.婚姻状况、教育程度和家庭规模对罗马尼亚父母应对幼儿龋齿行为的影响。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Mar 3;13(3):111. doi: 10.3390/dj13030111.
2
Parental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Early Childhood Caries in Bihor, Romania: A Cross-Sectional Study.罗马尼亚比霍尔地区父母关于幼儿龋齿的知识、态度和行为:一项横断面研究
Children (Basel). 2024 Sep 18;11(9):1131. doi: 10.3390/children11091131.
3
Evaluation of the Distortion of Essix Retainer Formed From Biostar Machine Using Intraoral Digital Scans: An In Vitro Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Children's Drawing as a Projective Measure to Understand Their Experiences of Dental Treatment under General Anesthesia.儿童绘画作为一种投射性测量方法,用于了解他们在全身麻醉下接受牙科治疗的经历。
Children (Basel). 2020 Jul 3;7(7):73. doi: 10.3390/children7070073.
2
Correction of Class III malocclusions through morphological changes of the maxilla using the protraction face mask by three different therapeutic approaches.采用三种不同治疗方法,通过使用前方牵引面罩改变上颌骨形态来矫治Ⅲ类错牙合畸形。
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2019;60(2):605-615.
3
Environmental Factors Associated with Malocclusion in Children Population from Mining Areas, Western Romania.
使用口内数字扫描评估由Biostar机器制作的Essix保持器的变形:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 14;16(8):e66858. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66858. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Orthodontic Retainers-A Critical Review.正畸保持器——一项批判性综述
Children (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;10(2):230. doi: 10.3390/children10020230.
5
Substantial Improvements in Facial Morphology through Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment: A Case Report and Literature Review.手术-正畸治疗对面部形态的显著改善:病例报告及文献复习。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Aug 3;58(8):1043. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081043.
6
Post-treatment Stability in Orthodontic Retention with Twistflex Retainers-Do Patients Benefit from Additional Removable Retainers?正畸保持中 Twistflex 保持器的治疗后稳定性——患者是否受益于额外的可摘保持器?
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Aug;26(8):5215-5222. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04490-1. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
7
Chronological Age in Different Bone Development Stages: A Retrospective Comparative Study.不同骨骼发育阶段的实足年龄:一项回顾性比较研究。
Children (Basel). 2021 Feb 13;8(2):142. doi: 10.3390/children8020142.
罗马尼亚西部矿区儿童错颌畸形的环境因素分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 12;16(18):3383. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183383.
4
Medical, Dental, and Nursing Students' Knowledge about Early Childhood Oral Health Care.医学、牙科和护理专业学生关于幼儿口腔保健的知识。
Children (Basel). 2019 Sep 2;6(9):97. doi: 10.3390/children6090097.
5
Comparison of Two Retention Appliances with Respect to Clinical Effectiveness.两种保持器临床效果的比较。
Turk J Orthod. 2019 Jun;32(2):72-78. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18045. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
6
Implementing post-orthodontic compliance among adolescents wearing removable retainers through Whatsapp: a pilot study.通过WhatsApp在佩戴活动保持器的青少年中实施正畸后依从性:一项试点研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Apr 23;13:609-615. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S200822. eCollection 2019.
7
Long-term effects of different cleaning methods on copolyester retainer properties.不同清洗方法对共聚聚酯保持器性能的长期影响。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Mar;89(2):221-227. doi: 10.2319/010218-2.1. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
8
Periodontal health and compliance: A comparison between Essix and Hawley retainers.牙周健康与依从性:Essix 和 Hawley 保持器的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Jun;153(6):852-860. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.10.025.
9
The retention characteristics of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers with different retention protocols.采用不同保持方案的霍利保持器和真空成型保持器的保持特性。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Mar 1;10(3):e224-e231. doi: 10.4317/jced.54511. eCollection 2018 Mar.
10
Performance of Hawley-type retainers: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.霍利氏保持器的性能:随机临床试验的系统评价
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Apr 6;40(2):115-125. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx036.