Theodorelos Panagiotis, Ferrillo Martina, Pandis Nikolaos, Kloukos Dimitrios, Fleming Padhraig S, Katsaros Christos
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2024 Dec 5;22:647-654. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b5871487.
The prevalence of gingival recession in orthodontically treated patients and the relative impact of retainer type on its occurrence remain poorly understood. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between previous orthodontic treatment and retainer type on the long-term prevalence of gingival recession and to evaluate the role of other patient-related factors, such as gender, age, smoking and gingival phenotype.
We included subjects both with and without a history of previous orthodontics (at least 5 years post-treatment). The periodontal status assessment and the presence of gingival recession were recorded. A generalised estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression model was used to examine the effect of the mode of retention and tooth type on recession adjusted for age, smoking, gender and gingival phenotype.
A total of 251 individuals (mean age of 32 ± 9.43 years) were included. Ninety-nine (39.4%) had a history of orthodontics with an observation period of 15.7 years. Those undergoing orthodontics followed by fixed retention had the highest prevalence and magnitude of recession; a history of orthodontics was statistically associated with the occurrence of recession (odds ratio: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.52; 3.82; P 0.001). Both age and the presence of a thin gingival phenotype were significant predictors for recession (P 0.001). The adjusted probabilities of recession per tooth indicated that the mandibular central incisors had the highest probability for recession, with either a fixed or removable retainer.
Based on this observational study, the provision of orthodontic treatment followed by removable or fixed retention had a bearing on the occurrence of recession. The aetiology of gingival recession is multifactorial with a thin periodontal phenotype, age and smoking history being risk factors, while mandibular central incisors are particularly susceptible.
正畸治疗患者中牙龈退缩的患病率以及保持器类型对其发生的相对影响仍知之甚少。本研究的目的是调查既往正畸治疗和保持器类型与牙龈退缩长期患病率之间的关联,并评估其他与患者相关的因素,如性别、年龄、吸烟和牙龈表型的作用。
我们纳入了有和没有既往正畸治疗史(治疗后至少5年)的受试者。记录牙周状况评估和牙龈退缩的存在情况。使用广义估计方程(GEE)逻辑回归模型来检验保持方式和牙齿类型对经年龄、吸烟、性别和牙龈表型调整后的退缩的影响。
共纳入251名个体(平均年龄32±9.43岁)。99名(39.4%)有正畸治疗史,观察期为15.7年。正畸治疗后采用固定保持的患者牙龈退缩的患病率和程度最高;正畸治疗史与退缩的发生在统计学上相关(优势比:2.40;95%置信区间:1.52;3.82;P<0.001)。年龄和薄牙龈表型的存在都是退缩的显著预测因素(P<0.001)。每颗牙齿退缩的调整概率表明,无论使用固定还是可摘保持器,下颌中切牙退缩的概率最高。
基于这项观察性研究,正畸治疗后采用可摘或固定保持与退缩的发生有关。牙龈退缩的病因是多因素的,薄牙周表型、年龄和吸烟史是危险因素,而下颌中切牙尤其易感。