Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Stat Med. 2018 Sep 30;37(22):3147-3178. doi: 10.1002/sim.7830. Epub 2018 May 31.
While traditional clinical trials seek to determine treatment efficacy within a specified population, they often ignore the role of a patient's treatment preference on his or her treatment response. The two-stage (doubly) randomized preference trial design provides one approach for researchers seeking to disentangle preference effects from treatment effects. Currently, this two-stage design is limited to the design and analysis of continuous outcome variables; in this presentation, we extend this current design to include binary variables. We present test statistics for testing preference, selection, and treatment effects in a two-stage randomized design with a binary outcome measure, with and without stratification. We also derive closed-form sample size formulas to indicate the number of patients needed to detect each effect. A series of simulation studies explore the properties and efficiency of both the unstratified and stratified two-stage randomized trial designs. Finally, we demonstrate the applicability of these methods using an example of a trial of Hepatitis C treatment.
虽然传统的临床试验旨在确定特定人群中的治疗效果,但它们往往忽略了患者对治疗的偏好对其治疗反应的影响。两阶段(双重)随机偏好试验设计为寻求将偏好效应与治疗效应分开的研究人员提供了一种方法。目前,这种两阶段设计仅限于连续结果变量的设计和分析;在本次演讲中,我们将此现有设计扩展到包括二项变量。我们提出了用于测试两阶段随机设计中具有二项结果测量的偏好、选择和治疗效果的检验统计量,包括和不包括分层。我们还推导出了封闭形式的样本量公式,以指示检测每种效果所需的患者数量。一系列模拟研究探讨了无分层和分层两阶段随机试验设计的特性和效率。最后,我们使用丙型肝炎治疗试验的示例演示了这些方法的适用性。