Al-Hijji Mohammed, El Sabbagh Abdallah, Holmes David R
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Korean Circ J. 2018 Jun;48(6):447-462. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0078.
Revascularization of severe left main and multivessel coronary artery disease has been shown to improve survival in both stable ischemic heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. While revascularization with coronary artery bypass surgery for these disease entities carries class I recommendation in most current guidelines, recent trials has shown potential comparable survival and cardiovascular outcomes between percutaneous and surgical interventions in patients with less complex coronary anatomy. Despite the conflicting results observed in the most recent left main revascularization trials, Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (EXCEL) and Nordic-Baltic-British left main revascularization (NOBLE), both treatment strategies remain important for the management of left main disease (LMD) and multivessel disease (MVD) reflecting on the importance of heart team discussion. This review is focused on revascularization of LMD and MVD in patients who are not presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, encompassing the evidence from historic and contemporary trials which shaped up current practices. This review discusses the heart team approach to guide decision making, including special populations that are not represented in clinical trials.
对于严重左主干和多支冠状动脉疾病,血运重建已被证明可改善稳定型缺血性心脏病和急性冠状动脉综合征患者的生存率。虽然目前大多数指南中,针对这些疾病实体进行冠状动脉搭桥手术血运重建为I类推荐,但最近的试验表明,在冠状动脉解剖结构不太复杂的患者中,经皮介入治疗和外科手术干预在生存及心血管结局方面具有潜在可比性。尽管在最近的左主干血运重建试验中观察到相互矛盾的结果,如依维莫司洗脱支架或冠状动脉搭桥术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病(EXCEL)试验以及北欧-波罗的海-英国左主干血运重建(NOBLE)试验,但两种治疗策略对于左主干疾病(LMD)和多支血管疾病(MVD)的管理仍然很重要,这体现了心脏团队讨论的重要性。本综述聚焦于非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的LMD和MVD血运重建,涵盖了影响当前实践的历史和当代试验证据。本综述讨论了指导决策的心脏团队方法,包括临床试验中未涉及的特殊人群。