Centre for Congenital Heart Disease, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Inselspital, University Hospital, University Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Centre for Congenital Heart Disease, Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, University Hospital, University Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Oct;106(4):1220-1227. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 30.
Vertical right axillary mini-thoracotomy (VRAMT) is the standard approach for correction of atrial septal defect and partial atrioventricular septal defect at our institution. This observational single-center study compares our initial results with the VRAMT approach for the repair of ventricular septal defect (VSD) and complete atrioventricular septal defect (CAVSD) in infants and children to an approach using standard median sternotomy (MS).
The perioperative courses of patients undergoing VSD and CAVSD correction through either a VRAMT or an MS were analyzed retrospectively. The surgical technique for the VRAMT involved a 4- to 5-cm vertical incision in the right axillary fold.
Of 84 patients, 25 (VSD, n = 15; CAVSD, n = 10) underwent correction through a VRAMT approach, whereas 59 (VSD, n = 35; CAVSD, n = 24) had repair through MS. VSD and CAVSD groups were comparable with respect to age and weight. No significant differences were observed for aortic cross-clamp duration, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and echocardiographic follow-up. There was no need for any conversion from VRAMT to MS in any case. Neither wound infections nor thoracic deformities were observed in both groups.
VRAMT can be considered as a safe and effective approach for the repair of VSD and CAVSD in selected patient groups, and the outcome data appear comparable to those of MS.
在我院,垂直右腋下小开胸术(VRAMT)是矫正房间隔缺损和部分房室间隔缺损的标准方法。本观察性单中心研究将我们使用 VRAMT 治疗婴儿和儿童室间隔缺损(VSD)和完全房室间隔缺损(CAVSD)的初始结果与使用标准正中胸骨切开术(MS)的方法进行了比较。
回顾性分析了通过 VRAMT 或 MS 行 VSD 和 CAVSD 矫正术患者的围手术期情况。VRAMT 的手术技术涉及在右腋窝褶皱处进行 4-5cm 的垂直切口。
84 例患者中,25 例(VSD,n=15;CAVSD,n=10)通过 VRAMT 方法进行了矫正,而 59 例(VSD,n=35;CAVSD,n=24)通过 MS 进行了修复。VSD 和 CAVSD 组在年龄和体重方面具有可比性。主动脉阻断时间、重症监护病房停留时间、住院时间和超声心动图随访均无显著差异。在任何情况下均无需将 VRAMT 转换为 MS。两组均未观察到伤口感染或胸廓畸形。
VRAMT 可被视为治疗特定患者群体的 VSD 和 CAVSD 的安全有效方法,其结果数据与 MS 相当。