Donovan Tim, Felix Lambert M, Chalmers James D, Milan Stephen J, Mathioudakis Alexander G, Spencer Sally
Medical and Sport Sciences, University of Cumbria, Lancaster, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 3;6(6):CD012733. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012733.pub2.
Bronchiectasis is a chronic airway disease characterised by a destructive cycle of recurrent airway infection, inflammation and tissue damage. Antibiotics are a main treatment for bronchiectasis. The aim of continuous therapy with prophylactic antibiotics is to suppress bacterial load, but bacteria may become resistant to the antibiotic, leading to a loss of effectiveness. On the other hand, intermittent prophylactic antibiotics, given over a predefined duration and interval, may reduce antibiotic selection pressure and reduce or prevent the development of resistance. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current evidence for studies comparing continuous versus intermittent administration of antibiotic treatment in bronchiectasis in terms of clinical efficacy, the emergence of resistance and serious adverse events.
To evaluate the effectiveness of continuous versus intermittent antibiotics in the treatment of adults and children with bronchiectasis, using the primary outcomes of exacerbations, antibiotic resistance and serious adverse events.
On 1 August 2017 and 4 May 2018 we searched the Cochrane Airways Review Group Specialised Register (CAGR), CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and AMED. On 25 September 2017 and 4 May 2018 we also searched www.clinicaltrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) trials portal, conference proceedings and the reference lists of existing systematic reviews.
We planned to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults or children with bronchiectasis that compared continuous versus intermittent administration of long-term prophylactic antibiotics of at least three months' duration. We considered eligible studies reported as full-text articles, as abstracts only and unpublished data.
Two review authors independently screened the search results and full-text reports.
We identified 268 unique records. Of these we retrieved and examined 126 full-text reports, representing 114 studies, but none of these studies met our inclusion criteria.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No randomised controlled trials have compared the effectiveness and risks of continuous antibiotic therapy versus intermittent antibiotic therapy for bronchiectasis. High-quality clinical trials are needed to establish which of these interventions is more effective for reducing the frequency and duration of exacerbations, antibiotic resistance and the occurrence of serious adverse events.
支气管扩张症是一种慢性气道疾病,其特征为反复出现气道感染、炎症和组织损伤的破坏性循环。抗生素是支气管扩张症的主要治疗方法。预防性抗生素持续治疗的目的是抑制细菌载量,但细菌可能会对抗生素产生耐药性,导致治疗效果丧失。另一方面,在预定义的持续时间和间隔内给予间歇性预防性抗生素,可能会降低抗生素选择压力,并减少或预防耐药性的产生。本系统评价旨在评估目前关于比较支气管扩张症患者中抗生素持续给药与间歇给药在临床疗效、耐药性出现及严重不良事件方面的研究证据。
使用病情加重、抗生素耐药性及严重不良事件等主要结局指标,评估持续使用抗生素与间歇使用抗生素治疗成人和儿童支气管扩张症的有效性。
2017年8月1日和2018年5月4日,我们检索了Cochrane气道综述小组专业注册库(CAGR)、Cochrane系统评价数据库、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)和联合与补充医学数据库(AMED)。2017年9月25日和2018年5月4日,我们还检索了美国国立医学图书馆临床试验注册库(www.clinicaltrials.gov)、世界卫生组织(WHO)试验平台、会议论文集以及现有系统评价的参考文献列表。
我们计划纳入比较至少为期三个月的长期预防性抗生素持续给药与间歇给药的支气管扩张症成人或儿童随机对照试验(RCT)。我们认为符合条件的研究包括全文发表的文章、仅作为摘要发表的数据以及未发表的数据。
两位综述作者独立筛选检索结果和全文报告。
我们共识别出268条独特记录。其中,我们检索并审查了126篇全文报告,代表114项研究,但这些研究均未符合我们的纳入标准。
尚无随机对照试验比较支气管扩张症患者持续抗生素治疗与间歇抗生素治疗的有效性和风险。需要高质量的临床试验来确定哪种干预措施在降低病情加重的频率和持续时间、抗生素耐药性及严重不良事件的发生方面更有效。