Srinivasa Rao Boddapati, Chandrasekaran C V, Srikanth H S, Sasikumar Murugan, Edwin Jothie R, Haseena Begum, Bharathi Bethapudi, Selvam Ramasamy, Prashanth D'Souza
R&D, Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd., Plot No. 5B, Veerasandra Industrial Area, 19th KM Stone, Hosur Road, Bangalore, Karnataka 560100, India.
J Toxicol. 2018 May 10;2018:9412167. doi: 10.1155/2018/9412167. eCollection 2018.
Herbal products are being used and trusted globally for thousands of years for their health benefits and limited side effects. Globally, a general belief amongst the consumers is that herbal supplements are always safe because they are "natural." But later, research reveals that they may not be safe. This raises concern on their safety and implications for their use as feed supplement or medicine. Toxicity testing can reveal some of the risks that may be associated with use of herbs, therefore avoiding potential harmful effects. The present study was designed to investigate five poultry feed supplements (PFS), EGMAX® (to revitalize ovarian activity), FEED-X (feed efficiency enhancer), KOLIN PLUS (natural replacer of synthetic choline chloride), PHYTOCEE® (natural defence enhancer), and STODI® (to prevent and control loose droppings), for their possible mutagenicity and toxicity. Bacterial reverse mutation (BRMT) and acute oral toxicity tests were employed to assess the PFS for their possible mutagenicity and toxicity. Results indicated that the PFS were devoid of mutagenic effects in BRMT and showed higher safety profile in rodent acute oral toxicity test.
数千年来,草药产品因其对健康有益且副作用有限而在全球范围内被使用和信赖。在全球范围内,消费者普遍认为草药补充剂总是安全的,因为它们是“天然的”。但后来的研究表明,它们可能并不安全。这引发了人们对其安全性以及用作饲料补充剂或药物的影响的担忧。毒性测试可以揭示一些与草药使用相关的风险,从而避免潜在的有害影响。本研究旨在调查五种家禽饲料补充剂(PFS),即EGMAX®(恢复卵巢活性)、FEED-X(饲料效率增强剂)、KOLIN PLUS(合成氯化胆碱的天然替代品)、PHYTOCEE®(天然防御增强剂)和STODI®(预防和控制腹泻)的潜在致突变性和毒性。采用细菌回复突变试验(BRMT)和急性经口毒性试验来评估这些PFS的潜在致突变性和毒性。结果表明,这些PFS在BRMT中无致突变作用,并且在啮齿动物急性经口毒性试验中显示出较高的安全性。