• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparing and contrasting 'innovation platforms' with other forms of professional networks for strengthening primary healthcare systems for Indigenous Australians.将“创新平台”与其他形式的专业网络进行比较和对比,以加强澳大利亚原住民的初级医疗保健系统。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 May 17;3(3):e000683. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000683. eCollection 2018.
2
Using developmental evaluation to enhance continuous reflection, learning and adaptation of an innovation platform in Australian Indigenous primary healthcare.利用发展性评估加强澳大利亚原住民初级医疗保健创新平台的持续反思、学习和适应。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 12;18(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00562-4.
3
Correction: .更正:.
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Jun 22;3(3):e000683corr1. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000683corr1. eCollection 2018.
4
Identifying evidence-practice gaps and strategies for improvement in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander maternal health care.识别原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民孕产妇保健中证据与实践的差距及改进策略。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 7;13(2):e0192262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192262. eCollection 2018.
5
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health: current status and recent initiatives. Health and Community Development Branch, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission.原住民及托雷斯海峡岛民健康:现状与近期举措。原住民及托雷斯海峡岛民委员会健康与社区发展处。
Aust Health Rev. 1993;16(4):332-9.
6
Facilitating engagement through strong relationships between primary healthcare and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.通过初级医疗保健与原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民之间的紧密关系促进参与。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016 Dec;40(6):535-541. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12553. Epub 2016 Aug 14.
7
Using a participatory action research framework to listen to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia about pandemic influenza.运用参与式行动研究框架,倾听澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民关于大流行性流感的看法。
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Jul-Sep;15(3):2923. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
8
Exploration of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives of Home Medicines Review.探索原住民及托雷斯海峡岛民对家庭药物审查的看法。
Rural Remote Health. 2015;15:3009. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
9
Vaccine preventable diseases and vaccination coverage in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, Australia 2003 to 2006.2003年至2006年澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民中的疫苗可预防疾病及疫苗接种覆盖率
Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2008 Jun;32 Suppl:S2-67.
10
The beyond borders initiative: Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and international public health students: engaging partners in cross-cultural learning.超越国界倡议:原住民、托雷斯海峡岛民及国际公共卫生专业学生:让合作伙伴参与跨文化学习
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2014 May-Aug;27(2):132-7. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.143729.

引用本文的文献

1
Reflecting on the quality of a methodologically pluralist evaluation of a large-scale Indigenous health research collaboration in Australia.反思对澳大利亚一项大型原住民健康研究合作进行方法多元化评价的质量。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Aug 3;9(8):e014433. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014433.
2
Producing knowledge together: a participatory approach to synthesising research across a large-scale collaboration in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health.共同产生知识:一种参与式方法,用于综合大型澳裔和托雷斯海峡岛民健康合作研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jan 3;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01087-2.
3
Patterns of collaboration and knowledge generated by an Australian rural research centre over 20 years: a co-authorship network analysis.澳大利亚农村研究中心 20 多年来的合作模式和知识成果:合著网络分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Aug 30;21(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01029-y.
4
Network evaluation of an innovation platform in continuous quality improvement in Australian Indigenous primary healthcare.澳大利亚原住民初级医疗保健中持续质量改进创新平台的网络评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Oct 31;20(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00909-z.
5
Methodological pluralism for better evaluations of complex interventions: lessons from evaluating an innovation platform in Australia.方法学多元化以更好地评估复杂干预措施:来自澳大利亚评估创新平台的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jan 28;20(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00814-5.
6
Collaboration and knowledge generation in an 18-year quality improvement research programme in Australian Indigenous primary healthcare: a coauthorship network analysis.协作与知识生成在澳大利亚原住民初级医疗保健 18 年质量改进研究计划中:合著网络分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 6;11(5):e045101. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045101.
7
The uses of knowledge in global health.全球卫生领域知识的应用。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Apr;6(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005802.
8
Principles guiding ethical research in a collaboration to strengthen Indigenous primary healthcare in Australia: learning from experience.指导澳大利亚加强原住民初级卫生保健合作中进行伦理研究的原则:从经验中学习。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jan;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003852.
9
Using developmental evaluation to enhance continuous reflection, learning and adaptation of an innovation platform in Australian Indigenous primary healthcare.利用发展性评估加强澳大利亚原住民初级医疗保健创新平台的持续反思、学习和适应。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 12;18(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00562-4.
10
[Participatory development of digital public health: tension between user perspectives and evidence].数字公共卫生的参与式发展:用户视角与证据之间的张力
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Feb;63(2):153-159. doi: 10.1007/s00103-019-03082-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning Collaboratives: Insights And A New Taxonomy From AHRQ's Two Decades Of Experience.学习协作体:来自 AHRQ 二十年经验的洞察与新分类法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Feb;37(2):205-212. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1144.
2
Encouraging translation and assessing impact of the Centre for Research Excellence in Integrated Quality Improvement: rationale and protocol for a research impact assessment.鼓励卓越综合质量改进研究中心的翻译工作并评估其影响:研究影响评估的基本原理与方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 4;7(12):e018572. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018572.
3
Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review.质量改进合作是否有效?系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):226-240. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006926. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
4
Impact of policy support on uptake of evidence-based continuous quality improvement activities and the quality of care for Indigenous Australians: a comparative case study.政策支持对澳大利亚原住民循证持续质量改进活动的采用及医疗服务质量的影响:一项比较案例研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 5;7(10):e016626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016626.
5
Building a primary care research network - lessons to learn.建立基层医疗研究网络——可吸取的经验教训。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017 Sep;35(3):229-230. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2017.1358439. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
6
The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: what works, for whom and in what setting? Protocol for a realist review.语境因素对医疗质量改进措施的影响:什么有效、对谁有效以及在什么环境下有效?一项真实审查研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 23;6(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0566-8.
7
A developmental evaluation to enhance stakeholder engagement in a wide-scale interactive project disseminating quality improvement data: study protocol for a mixed-methods study.一项旨在提高利益相关者参与度的发展性评估,该评估针对一个大规模交互式项目,该项目用于传播质量改进数据:一项混合方法研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):e016341. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016341.
8
Strengthening health systems through embedded research.通过嵌入式研究加强卫生系统。
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Feb 1;95(2):87. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.189126.
9
Engaging with complexity to improve the health of indigenous people: a call for the use of systems thinking to tackle health inequity.参与复杂性研究以改善原住民健康:呼吁运用系统思维解决健康不平等问题。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Feb 21;16(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0521-2.
10
The role of embedded research in quality improvement: a narrative review.嵌入式研究在质量改进中的作用:一项叙述性综述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jan;26(1):70-80. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004877. Epub 2016 Apr 29.

将“创新平台”与其他形式的专业网络进行比较和对比,以加强澳大利亚原住民的初级医疗保健系统。

Comparing and contrasting 'innovation platforms' with other forms of professional networks for strengthening primary healthcare systems for Indigenous Australians.

作者信息

Bailie Jodie, Cunningham Frances Clare, Bainbridge Roxanne Gwendalyn, Passey Megan E, Laycock Alison Frances, Bailie Ross Stewart, Larkins Sarah L, Brands Jenny S M, Ramanathan Shanthi, Abimbola Seye, Peiris David

机构信息

University Centre for Rural Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2018 May 17;3(3):e000683. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000683. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000683
PMID:29862056
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5969724/
Abstract

Efforts to strengthen health systems require the engagement of diverse, multidisciplinary stakeholder networks. Networks provide a forum for experimentation and knowledge creation, information exchange and the spread of good ideas and practice. They might be useful in addressing complex issues or 'wicked' problems, the solutions to which go beyond the control and scope of any one agency. Innovation platforms are proposed as a novel type of network because of their diverse stakeholder composition and focus on problem solving within complex systems. Thus, they have potential applicability to health systems strengthening initiatives, even though they have been predominantly applied in the international agricultural development sector. In this paper, we compare and contrast the concept of innovation platforms with other types of networks that can be used in efforts to strengthen primary healthcare systems, such as communities of practice, practice-based research networks and quality improvement collaboratives. We reflect on our ongoing research programme that applies innovation platform concepts to drive large-scale quality improvement in primary healthcare for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians and outline our plans for evaluation. Lessons from our experience will find resonance with others working on similar initiatives in global health.

摘要

加强卫生系统的努力需要不同的多学科利益相关者网络的参与。网络为实验和知识创造、信息交流以及好想法和实践的传播提供了一个平台。它们可能有助于解决复杂问题或 “棘手” 问题,这些问题的解决方案超出了任何一个机构的控制范围和能力。创新平台因其利益相关者构成多样且专注于复杂系统内的问题解决而被提议作为一种新型网络。因此,它们对卫生系统加强举措具有潜在的适用性,尽管它们主要应用于国际农业发展领域。在本文中,我们将创新平台的概念与其他可用于加强初级卫生保健系统的网络类型进行比较和对比,这些网络类型包括实践社区、基于实践的研究网络和质量改进协作组织。我们反思了我们正在进行的研究项目,该项目应用创新平台概念推动澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民初级卫生保健的大规模质量改进,并概述了我们的评估计划。我们经验中的教训将与全球卫生领域从事类似举措的其他人产生共鸣。