• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慕尼黑昼夜节律问卷与腕部活动记录仪之间的关联。

Association between the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire and Wrist Actigraphy.

作者信息

Santisteban Jose Arturo, Brown Thomas G, Gruber Reut

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Addiction Research Program, Research Centre of the Douglas Mental Health, University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Sleep Disord. 2018 May 9;2018:5646848. doi: 10.1155/2018/5646848. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1155/2018/5646848
PMID:29862086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5971234/
Abstract

Chronotype refers to individuals' preferences for timing of sleep and wakefulness. It can be quantified by measuring the midpoint time between the start and end of sleep during free days. Measuring chronotype is helpful to diagnose circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders. The Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ) is a self-reported measure of chronotype that calculates the midpoint of sleep on free days based on self-reported bed and wake times. Self-reports of sleep are prone to bias. The objective was to examine the agreement between the MCTQ-derived midpoint and an objective measure obtained using wrist actigraphy. The sleep of 115 participants aged 18-34 (mean = 24, SD = 4.6) was monitored with actigraphy for 4 to 6 consecutive nights. The corrected midpoint of sleep on free days was derived from sleep start and end times on both free days and scheduled days. The corrected midpoint of sleep on free days as measured by the MCTQ was 4:56 (SD = 1 : 16) and by actigraphy was 4:51 (SD = 1 : 23). They were not significantly different ( = 0.66, = 0.51). A strong correlation was found between these two measurements ( = 0.73, < 0.001). The 95% limits of agreement were between -1:37:19 and 2:14:38. MCTQ and actigraphy provide similar results for the corrected midpoint of sleep on free days.

摘要

昼夜节律类型是指个体对睡眠时间和清醒时间的偏好。它可以通过测量休息日睡眠开始和结束之间的中点时间来量化。测量昼夜节律类型有助于诊断昼夜节律性睡眠-觉醒障碍。慕尼黑昼夜节律类型问卷(MCTQ)是一种通过自我报告来测量昼夜节律类型的方法,它根据自我报告的上床睡觉时间和起床时间来计算休息日睡眠的中点时间。睡眠的自我报告容易出现偏差。目的是检验MCTQ得出的中点时间与使用手腕活动记录仪获得的客观测量结果之间的一致性。对115名年龄在18至34岁(平均年龄 = 24岁,标准差 = 4.6)的参与者的睡眠进行了连续4至6晚的活动记录仪监测。休息日睡眠的校正中点时间是根据休息日和工作日的睡眠开始和结束时间得出的。通过MCTQ测量的休息日睡眠校正中点时间为4:56(标准差 = 1:16),通过活动记录仪测量的为4:51(标准差 = 1:23)。它们之间没有显著差异(t = 0.66,p = 0.51)。发现这两种测量方法之间存在很强的相关性(r = 0.73,p < 0.001)。一致性的95%界限在-1:37:19至2:14:38之间。MCTQ和活动记录仪在休息日睡眠校正中点时间方面提供了相似的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d9/5971234/13aad40fb464/SD2018-5646848.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d9/5971234/8d4de776477a/SD2018-5646848.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d9/5971234/33553c330ce3/SD2018-5646848.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d9/5971234/13aad40fb464/SD2018-5646848.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d9/5971234/8d4de776477a/SD2018-5646848.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d9/5971234/33553c330ce3/SD2018-5646848.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d9/5971234/13aad40fb464/SD2018-5646848.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire and Wrist Actigraphy.慕尼黑昼夜节律问卷与腕部活动记录仪之间的关联。
Sleep Disord. 2018 May 9;2018:5646848. doi: 10.1155/2018/5646848. eCollection 2018.
2
Validation of the Chinese version of the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ) in Hong Kong Chinese youths.慕尼黑时间类型问卷(MCTQ)中文版在香港青年中的效度验证。
Chronobiol Int. 2022 May;39(5):678-689. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2022.2025821. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
3
Validation of the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ) in Chinese college freshmen based on questionnaires and actigraphy.基于问卷和活动记录仪对中国大学新生的慕尼黑时间类型问卷(MCTQ)进行验证。
Chronobiol Int. 2023 May;40(5):661-672. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2023.2202246. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
4
The µMCTQ: An Ultra-Short Version of the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire.µMCTQ:慕尼黑时间类型问卷的超短版。
J Biol Rhythms. 2020 Feb;35(1):98-110. doi: 10.1177/0748730419886986. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
5
Human chronotype: Comparison of questionnaires and wrist-worn actigraphy.人类昼夜节律类型:问卷调查与腕部活动记录仪的比较。
Chronobiol Int. 2022 Feb;39(2):205-220. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2021.1992418. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
6
Modified Munich chronotype questionnaire for application to short-interval split sleep of non-shift workers.用于非轮班工人短间隔分段睡眠的改良慕尼黑时型问卷。
Chronobiol Int. 2021 May;38(5):659-665. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2021.1887209. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
Validation of the Korean Munich Chronotype Questionnaire.验证韩国慕尼黑昼夜类型问卷。
Sleep Breath. 2018 Sep;22(3):773-779. doi: 10.1007/s11325-017-1609-z. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
8
Validity of the Japanese version of the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire.日本版慕尼黑时间类型问卷的效度
Chronobiol Int. 2014 Aug;31(7):845-50. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2014.914035. Epub 2014 May 14.
9
Finding DLMO: estimating dim light melatonin onset from sleep markers derived from questionnaires, diaries and actigraphy.寻找褪黑素分泌起始时间(DLMO):从问卷、日记和活动记录仪得出的睡眠标志物估算褪黑素分泌起始时间。
Chronobiol Int. 2020 Sep-Oct;37(9-10):1412-1424. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2020.1809443. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
10
Late chronotype and high social jetlag are associated with burnout in evening-shift workers: Assessment using the Chinese-version MCTQ.晚睡型生物钟和较高的社会时差与夜班工作者的职业倦怠有关:使用中文版MCTQ进行评估。
Chronobiol Int. 2018 Jul;35(7):910-919. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2018.1439500. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A common alteration in effort-based decision-making in apathy, anhedonia, and late circadian rhythm.冷漠、快感缺乏和昼夜节律晚期基于努力的决策中的一种常见改变。
Elife. 2025 Jun 16;13:RP96803. doi: 10.7554/eLife.96803.
2
Interrelationships between sleep quality, circadian phase and rapid eye movement sleep: Deriving chronotype from sleep architecture.睡眠质量、昼夜节律阶段与快速眼动睡眠之间的相互关系:从睡眠结构推导昼夜节律类型。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Apr 21;57(5):150. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02671-w.
3
Examining the Agreement Between Subjective and Objective Measures of Sleep: A Comparison of Munich Chronotype Questionnaire and Fitbit-Derived Sleep Metrics.

本文引用的文献

1
Having Trouble Typing? What on Earth Is Chronotype?打字有困难?到底什么是生物钟类型?
J Biol Rhythms. 2015 Dec;30(6):487-91. doi: 10.1177/0748730415603835. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
2
Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Intrinsic Circadian Rhythm Sleep-Wake Disorders: Advanced Sleep-Wake Phase Disorder (ASWPD), Delayed Sleep-Wake Phase Disorder (DSWPD), Non-24-Hour Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (N24SWD), and Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (ISWRD). An Update for 2015: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline.内源性昼夜节律性睡眠-觉醒障碍治疗临床实践指南:早睡-早起型睡眠障碍(ASWPD)、晚睡-晚起型睡眠障碍(DSWPD)、非24小时睡眠-觉醒节律障碍(N24SWD)和不规则睡眠-觉醒节律障碍(ISWRD)。2015年更新版:美国睡眠医学会临床实践指南。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2015 Oct 15;11(10):1199-236. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.5100.
3
检验睡眠主观与客观测量之间的一致性:慕尼黑昼夜节律问卷与Fitbit得出的睡眠指标的比较
J Sleep Res. 2025 Apr 9:e70065. doi: 10.1111/jsr.70065.
4
Validation of the Morningness-Eveningness Scale for Children (MESC) with ambulatory circadian monitoring of temperature, light exposure and activity.通过对体温、光照暴露和活动进行动态昼夜节律监测来验证儿童晨型-夜型量表(MESC)。
J Sleep Res. 2025 Aug;34(4):e14444. doi: 10.1111/jsr.14444. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
5
Midpoint of sleep is associated with sleep quality in older adults with and without symptomatic Alzheimer's disease.睡眠中点与患有和未患有症状性阿尔茨海默病的老年人的睡眠质量相关。
Sleep Adv. 2024 Apr 15;5(1):zpae023. doi: 10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae023. eCollection 2024.
6
Differential effects of chronotype on physical activity and cognitive performance in older adults.昼夜节律类型对老年人身体活动和认知表现的不同影响。
Front Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 17;3:1029221. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2023.1029221. eCollection 2023.
7
Chronotype delay and sleep disturbances shaped by the Antarctic polar night.受南极极夜影响的时型延迟和睡眠障碍。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 24;13(1):15957. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43102-0.
8
A better alignment between chronotype and school timing is associated with lower grade retention in adolescents.青少年的生物钟类型与上学时间的更好匹配与较低的留级率相关。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2023 Jun 21;8(1):21. doi: 10.1038/s41539-023-00171-0.
9
Chronotype and sleep duration interact to influence time to pregnancy: Results from a New York City cohort.时型与睡眠时长相互作用影响妊娠时间:来自纽约市队列的研究结果。
Sleep Health. 2023 Aug;9(4):467-474. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
10
COVID-19 Policies, Pandemic Disruptions, and Changes in Child Mental Health and Sleep in the United States.COVID-19 政策、大流行干扰以及美国儿童心理健康和睡眠的变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e232716. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.2716.
The SBSM Guide to Actigraphy Monitoring: Clinical and Research Applications.《活动记录仪监测SBSM指南:临床与研究应用》
Behav Sleep Med. 2015;13 Suppl 1:S4-S38. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2015.1046356.
4
Comparing the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire and Munich ChronoType Questionnaire to the Dim Light Melatonin Onset.将晨型-夜型问卷和慕尼黑时间类型问卷与褪黑素暗光起始时间进行比较。
J Biol Rhythms. 2015 Oct;30(5):449-53. doi: 10.1177/0748730415597520. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
5
Understanding Bland Altman analysis.理解布兰德-奥特曼分析。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Jun 5;25(2):141-51. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.015. eCollection 2015.
6
International classification of sleep disorders-third edition: highlights and modifications.国际睡眠障碍分类第三版:要点和修改。
Chest. 2014 Nov;146(5):1387-1394. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0970.
7
Validity of the Japanese version of the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire.日本版慕尼黑时间类型问卷的效度
Chronobiol Int. 2014 Aug;31(7):845-50. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2014.914035. Epub 2014 May 14.
8
Composite Scale of Morningness: psychometric properties, validity with Munich ChronoType Questionnaire and age/sex differences in Poland.晨型综合量表:心理测量特性、与慕尼黑时间类型问卷的效度及波兰的年龄/性别差异
Eur Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;30(1):166-71. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
9
Alternatives to polysomnography (PSG): a validation of wrist actigraphy and a partial-PSG system.多导睡眠图(PSG)的替代方法:腕部活动记录仪和部分PSG系统的验证
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Dec;46(4):1032-41. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0438-7.
10
Reviewing the psychometric properties of contemporary circadian typology measures.当代昼夜节律类型学测量工具的心理计量学特性评价。
Chronobiol Int. 2013 Dec;30(10):1261-71. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2013.817415. Epub 2013 Sep 3.