Pollack Teresa A, Illuri Vidhya, Khorzad Rebeca, Aleppo Grazia, Johnson Oakes Diana, Holl Jane L, Wallia Amisha
Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Center for Health Care Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 May 16;7(2):e000224. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000224. eCollection 2018.
Describe the application of a risk assessment to identify failures in the hospital discharge process of a high-risk patient group, liver transplant (LT) recipients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or hyperglycaemia who require high-risk medications.
A Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) of the hospital discharge process of LT recipients with DM and/or hyperglycaemia who required DM education and training before discharge was conducted using information from clinicians, patients and data extraction from the electronic health records (EHR). Failures and their causes were identified and the frequency and characteristics (harm, detectability) of each failure were assigned using a score of low/best (1) to high/worst (10); a Criticality Index (CI=Harm×Frequency) and a Risk Priority Number (RPN=Harm×Frequency×Detection) were also calculated.
An academic, tertiary care centre in Chicago, Illinois.
Healthcare providers (N=31) including physicians (n= 6), advanced practice providers (n=12), nurses (n=6), pharmacists (n= 4), staff (n=3) and patients (n=6) and caregivers (n=3) participated in the FMECA; EHR data for LT recipients with DM or hyperglycaemia (N=100) were collected.
Of 78 identified failures, the most critical failures (n=15; RPNs=700, 630, 560; CI=70) were related to variability in delivery of diabetes education and training, care coordination and medication prescribing patterns of providers. Underlying causes included timing of patient education, lack of assessment of patients' knowledge and industry-level design failures of healthcare products (eg, EHR, insulin pen).
Most identified critical failures are preventable and suggest the need for the design of interventions, informed by the failures identified by this FMECA, to mitigate safety risks and improve outcomes of high-risk patient populations.
描述风险评估在识别高危患者群体(患有糖尿病(DM)和/或高血糖且需要高风险药物治疗的肝移植(LT)受者)医院出院流程中的应用。
利用临床医生、患者提供的信息以及从电子健康记录(EHR)中提取的数据,对出院前需要糖尿病教育和培训的患有DM和/或高血糖的LT受者的医院出院流程进行失效模式、影响及危害性分析(FMECA)。识别出失效及其原因,并使用从低/最佳(1)到高/最差(10)的分数对每个失效的频率和特征(危害、可检测性)进行赋值;还计算了临界指数(CI = 危害×频率)和风险优先数(RPN = 危害×频率×可检测性)。
伊利诺伊州芝加哥的一家学术性三级医疗中心。
包括医生(n = 6)、高级执业提供者(n = 12)、护士(n = 6)、药剂师(n = 4)、工作人员(n = 3)的医疗保健提供者(N = 31)以及患者(n = 6)和护理人员(n = 3)参与了FMECA;收集了患有DM或高血糖的LT受者的EHR数据(N = 100)。
在识别出的78个失效中,最关键的失效(n = 15;RPN分别为700、630、560;CI = 70)与糖尿病教育和培训的提供、护理协调以及提供者的药物处方模式的变异性有关。根本原因包括患者教育的时机、对患者知识的评估不足以及医疗保健产品(如EHR、胰岛素笔)的行业层面设计缺陷。
大多数识别出的关键失效是可预防的,这表明需要根据此FMECA识别出的失效来设计干预措施,以降低安全风险并改善高危患者群体的治疗效果。