Suppr超能文献

临床药物试验中不良事件的评估:识别阿米替林在安慰剂对照和基线对照下的副作用。

Assessment of adverse events in clinical drug trials: Identifying amitriptyline's placebo- and baseline-controlled side effects.

作者信息

Rheker Julia, Rief Winfried, Doering Bettina K, Winkler Alexander

机构信息

Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy.

出版信息

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Jun;26(3):320-326. doi: 10.1037/pha0000194.

Abstract

Adverse events in clinical drug trials are often poorly assessed and reported. The absence of baseline assessment and structured symptom lists, as well as the fact that most drug trials are industry-sponsored are common sources of bias. In addition, adverse events are usually assessed in patient samples, which can bias results because of the misattribution of symptoms that are part of the illness to medication intake. We aimed to identify amitriptyline's placebo- and baseline-controlled side effects by examining a sample of healthy adults, using structured assessments via a symptom list. Forty healthy individuals were randomized equally to either a group taking 50 mg amitriptyline on four consecutive days or to a placebo control group. Complaints were assessed via the Generic Assessment of Side Effects Scale prior to and after four days of medication intake. Frequency of complaints and their intensity were compared after medication intake between the two groups while controlling for complaints at baseline. The amitriptyline group's participants reported having suffered from "dry mouth," "dizziness," "subjective blood circulation-associated problems," and "constipation" significantly more often. When taking into account the complaint's intensity, the amitriptyline group also reported higher intensities for "dry mouth," "dizziness," and "subjective blood circulation-associated problems." Our results emphasize the importance of a structured and well-controlled harm assessment. Future drug trials should report the placebo- and baseline-controlled side effects with a clear causal relationship to the intake of the drug under investigation, in addition to the frequency of complaints and their odds ratios. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

临床药物试验中的不良事件往往评估和报告得很差。缺乏基线评估和结构化的症状清单,以及大多数药物试验由行业赞助这一事实,是常见的偏差来源。此外,不良事件通常在患者样本中进行评估,这可能会因将疾病相关症状错误归因于药物摄入而使结果产生偏差。我们旨在通过对健康成年人样本进行检查,使用症状清单进行结构化评估,来确定阿米替林的安慰剂对照和基线对照的副作用。40名健康个体被平均随机分为连续四天服用50毫克阿米替林的组或安慰剂对照组。在服药四天前后,通过副作用通用评估量表对症状进行评估。在控制基线症状的同时,比较两组服药后的症状频率及其强度。阿米替林组的参与者报告出现“口干”“头晕”“主观血液循环相关问题”和“便秘”的频率明显更高。考虑到症状强度,阿米替林组在“口干”“头晕”和“主观血液循环相关问题”方面的强度也更高。我们的结果强调了结构化和严格控制的危害评估的重要性。未来的药物试验除了应报告症状频率及其比值比外,还应报告与所研究药物摄入有明确因果关系的安慰剂对照和基线对照的副作用。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验