Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Program in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Dec;20(12):2888-2894.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Many of the reported adverse events in clinical trials of irritable bowel syndrome are extraintestinal symptoms, which typically are assessed by open-ended questions during the trial and not at baseline. This may lead to misattribution of some pre-existing symptoms as side effects to the treatment.
The current study analyzed data from a 6-week clinical trial of irritable bowel syndrome. Participants were randomized to receive double-blind peppermint oil, double-blind placebo, or treatment as usual. Extraintestinal symptoms were assessed at baseline and at the end of the study.
This analysis included 173 participants (30 received double-blind peppermint oil, 72 received treatment as usual, and 71 received double-blind placebo). At baseline, each group reported approximately 5 extraintestinal symptoms per participant. The number of symptoms per participant decreased to an average of 3 by the end-of-study visit, and this change was statistically significant in all groups (P < .001 for each group). When evaluating individual extraintestinal symptoms, the majority of participants did not report new/worse symptoms. In fact, between the baseline assessment and the final assessment, the average symptom severity decreased significantly in all 3 groups (P < .001).
Our study suggests that participants with irritable bowel syndrome often experience extraintestinal symptoms at baseline and that these symptoms generally improve in severity over the course of a clinical trial, regardless of the treatment arm. Systematic assessment of extraintestinal symptoms at the beginning of a clinical trial is necessary to determine more definitively whether these symptoms may be considered an adverse event attributable to a study medication.
许多在肠易激综合征临床试验中报告的不良事件都是肠外症状,这些症状通常在试验过程中通过开放式问题进行评估,而不是在基线时进行评估。这可能导致一些预先存在的症状被错误地归因于治疗的副作用。
本研究分析了一项为期 6 周的肠易激综合征临床试验的数据。参与者被随机分配接受薄荷油双盲治疗、安慰剂双盲治疗或常规治疗。在基线和研究结束时评估肠外症状。
本分析包括 173 名参与者(30 名接受薄荷油双盲治疗,72 名接受常规治疗,71 名接受安慰剂双盲治疗)。在基线时,每组参与者报告的肠外症状约为每个参与者 5 个。到研究结束时,每个参与者的症状数减少到平均 3 个,所有组的变化均具有统计学意义(每组 P <.001)。在评估个别肠外症状时,大多数参与者没有报告新的/更严重的症状。事实上,在基线评估和最终评估之间,所有 3 组的症状严重程度均显著降低(每组 P <.001)。
我们的研究表明,肠易激综合征患者在基线时常出现肠外症状,并且无论治疗组如何,这些症状通常在临床试验过程中严重程度会有所改善。在临床试验开始时系统地评估肠外症状对于更明确地确定这些症状是否可归因于研究药物的不良事件是必要的。