• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

这很复杂:利用小组成员的过程反馈来提高团体治疗师的有效性。

It's complicated: Using group member process-feedback to improve group therapist effectiveness.

机构信息

Department of Counseling, Higher Education and Special Education, University of Maryland, College Park.

出版信息

Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):164-169. doi: 10.1037/pst0000146.

DOI:10.1037/pst0000146
PMID:29863396
Abstract

Experienced leaders of psychotherapy groups are surprisingly inaccurate in their judgments about their members' perceptions of positive bonding relationships with the leader and other group members. The practical implication is worrisome: the lower the leader's degree of accuracy, the worse the member therapeutic outcomes tend to be. A promising approach to improving leaders' appraisals of their members' perceptions of positive bonding relationships is to provide them, after each session, feedback about their own and their members' bonding relationship perceptions. Profiling trajectories of leaders' and members' perceptions over time yields rich "stories" of relationship development, that if strategically packaged into brief, concise, and vivid reports, and delivered as a formal "group member feedback" intervention, would direct leaders' attention to those emerging, but easily overlooked, countertherapeutic relationships, requiring immediate, well-informed targeted interventions. To increase the utility of such reports, training leaders use intuitively appealing, but structured heuristics ("interpersonal-fit-with-the-group" and "intrapersonal-split-relationships"), accelerate leaders' recognition of patterns in perceptions as they change over time, and free up their cognitive resources for determining whether to intervene into the group process at the appropriate level: intraindividual, interpersonal, or group-as-a-whole. To illustrate the use of these heuristics, we present two hypothetical cases, with visual displays of congruent and discrepant perceptions of bonding relationship perceptions between members over time, and make tentative recommendations about where and when leaders might intervene to achieve optimal impact. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

经验丰富的心理治疗团体领导者在判断其成员对与领导者和其他团体成员的积极联系关系的看法时,出人意料地不准确。实际影响令人担忧:领导者的准确性越低,成员的治疗效果往往越差。一种有希望改善领导者对成员对积极联系关系的看法的方法是,在每次会议后,为他们提供有关自己和成员的联系关系看法的反馈。随着时间的推移,对领导者和成员的看法轨迹进行分析,可以得出有关关系发展的丰富“故事”,如果将这些故事以简短、简洁和生动的报告形式有策略地包装,并作为正式的“团体成员反馈”干预措施提供,将引导领导者关注那些新兴但容易被忽视的反治疗关系,需要立即进行明智的有针对性的干预。为了提高这些报告的实用性,培训领导者使用直观吸引人但结构化的启发式方法(“人际契合度-与团体”和“内在分裂关系”),加速领导者识别随着时间推移而变化的感知模式,并释放他们的认知资源,以确定是否在适当的水平上干预团体过程:个体内部、人际间或整个团体。为了说明这些启发式方法的使用,我们呈现了两个假设案例,随着时间的推移,展示了成员之间关于联系关系看法的一致和不一致的感知的视觉显示,并对领导者可能在何处以及何时进行干预以实现最佳效果提出了初步建议。

相似文献

1
It's complicated: Using group member process-feedback to improve group therapist effectiveness.这很复杂:利用小组成员的过程反馈来提高团体治疗师的有效性。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):164-169. doi: 10.1037/pst0000146.
2
Do clinicians really use feedback-monitoring systems? A qualitative analysis of 16 group leaders.临床医生真的会使用反馈监测系统吗?对 16 位组长的定性分析。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):132-143. doi: 10.1037/pst0000141.
3
Introduction to special issue: Feedback in group psychotherapy.特刊介绍:团体心理治疗中的反馈。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):101-104. doi: 10.1037/pst0000178.
4
Is there an optimal level of positive and negative feedback in group therapy? A response surface analysis.小组治疗中的正性和负性反馈是否存在最佳水平?反应曲面分析。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2020 Jun;57(2):174-183. doi: 10.1037/pst0000244. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
5
Leader Trust, Competence, LMX, and Member Performance: A Moderated Mediation Framework.领导信任、能力、领导-成员交换关系与成员绩效:一个有调节的中介框架。
Psychol Rep. 2017 Dec;120(6):1137-1159. doi: 10.1177/0033294117716465. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
6
The codevelopment of group relationships: The role of individual group member's and other group members' mutual influence and shared group environment.群体关系的共同发展:个体群体成员和其他群体成员的相互影响以及共享群体环境的作用。
J Couns Psychol. 2019 Oct;66(5):640-649. doi: 10.1037/cou0000349. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
7
Reality at odds with perceptions: narcissistic leaders and group performance.现实与认知相悖:自恋型领导者与团队绩效。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Oct;22(10):1259-64. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417259. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
8
The effects of relationship and progress feedback in group psychotherapy using the Group Questionnaire and Outcome Questionnaire-45: A randomized clinical trial.使用团体问卷和结果问卷-45 在团体心理治疗中关系和进展反馈的效果:一项随机临床试验。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):116-131. doi: 10.1037/pst0000133.
9
We will be champions: Leaders' confidence in 'us' inspires team members' team confidence and performance.我们将成为冠军:领导者对“我们”的信心激发团队成员的团队信心和表现。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Dec;26(12):1455-1469. doi: 10.1111/sms.12603. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
10
Practice-based evidence can help! Using the Group Questionnaire to enhance clinical practice.基于实践的证据可以提供帮助!使用团体问卷增强临床实践。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):196-202. doi: 10.1037/pst0000136.

引用本文的文献

1
Dose-Response Effects of MittEcho, a Measurement Feedback System, in an Indicated Mental Health Intervention for Children in Municipal and School Services in Norway.MittEcho(一种测量反馈系统)在挪威市政和学校服务机构针对儿童的定向心理健康干预中的剂量反应效应。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Jan;52(1):223-240. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01389-9. Epub 2024 May 29.