Department of Counseling and Psychological Services, Brigham Young University.
Department of Counseling and Psychological Services, Washington State University.
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):196-202. doi: 10.1037/pst0000136.
Practice-based evidence (Burlingame & Beecher, 2008) is an approach to evidence-based practice that addresses treatment efficacy to remediate clinicians' inability to predict treatment response (Chapman et al., 2012; Hannan et al., 2005). The Group Questionnaire (GQ; Bormann, Burlingame, & Straub, 2011; Johnson, Burlingame, Olsen, Davies, & Gleave, 2005) is one practice-based evidence measure that supports clinical judgment to enhance psychotherapy outcomes by measuring 3 important group constructs: Positive Bond, Positive Work, and Negative Relationship. A clinical example of how one group leader used GQ data provided by group members regarding their weekly group experiences to support her interventions in a process-oriented therapy group for adults includes verbatim clinical exchanges among group members and the leader. The example also includes a GQ report with explanations of the group members' scores and numerical and graphical data. The authors detail how the leader used the data from the measure to promote curiosity about group cohesion and movement toward treatment goals, to reframe perceptions of group interaction, and to gauge outcomes of shared group experience. The group leader's examination of the GQ data outside the group allowed her to use this information for positive impact inside the group to guide interventions and explore content and process, warranting additional attention. The authors encourage curiosity about other interactions among other group members reflected in the GQ report and how this information could be used to positively impact the group in other ways. (PsycINFO Database Record
基于实践的证据（Burlingame & Beecher，2008）是一种循证实践方法，旨在解决治疗效果，以弥补临床医生无法预测治疗反应的不足（Chapman 等人，2012；Hannan 等人，2005）。团体问卷（GQ；Bormann、Burlingame 和 Straub，2011；Johnson、Burlingame、Olsen、Davies 和 Gleave，2005）是一种基于实践的证据衡量标准，通过衡量 3 个重要的团体构建：积极联系、积极工作和消极关系，支持临床判断，以增强心理治疗效果。一位团体领导者如何使用团体成员提供的 GQ 数据来支持她在成人过程导向治疗团体中的干预措施的临床示例包括团体成员之间和领导者之间的逐字临床交流。该示例还包括 GQ 报告，其中解释了团体成员的分数以及数值和图形数据。作者详细介绍了领导者如何使用该措施的数据来促进对团体凝聚力的好奇心，并朝着治疗目标前进，重新构建对团体互动的看法，并衡量共同团体经验的结果。团体领导者在团体之外对 GQ 数据的检查使她能够将这些信息用于团体内部的积极影响，以指导干预措施并探索内容和过程，值得进一步关注。作者鼓励对 GQ 报告中反映的其他团体成员之间的其他互动产生好奇心，并探讨如何以其他方式将这些信息用于积极影响团体。（PsycINFO 数据库记录）
