Suppr超能文献

城市政策和个人特征对荷兰使用非正式和正式家庭佣工的影响。

Influence of municipal policy and individual characteristics on the use of informal and formal domestic help in the Netherlands.

机构信息

The Netherlands Institute for Social Research (SCP), The Netherlands.

The Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2018 Jul;122(7):791-796. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 May 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The responsibility for care and social support in the Netherlands has been decentralized to the municipalities, on the assumption that they are able to organise care and social support more effectively and efficiently. Municipalities are responsible for offering citizens the social support they need. They have policy discretion to decide how and to what extent they encourage and support the use of informal help. This article explored whether the local policy focus on informal or formal help influences the actual take-up of domestic help.

METHODS

Data on 567 physically disabled people who use informal or formal help in the household were linked to local policy data in 167 municipalities. We performed multilevel multinomial regression analyses. Since we expected that local policy will have more influence on people with slight or moderate disabilities, cohabitees and people aged under 75, cross-level interaction terms were included between characteristics of local policy and of individuals.

RESULTS

The findings reveal differences between municipalities in their policy on support and differences in the use of formal or informal support between municipalities.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no relationship between local emphasis on informal help and the use of informal help. Possible explanations: some people have a small social network, people using informal help did not apply for municipality support or even do not know the possibility exists.

摘要

背景

荷兰的护理和社会支持责任已下放到各市政府,因为假设它们能够更有效地组织护理和社会支持。市政府负责为公民提供所需的社会支持。它们有权自行决定如何以及在多大程度上鼓励和支持非正式帮助的使用。本文探讨了当地对非正式或正式帮助的政策重点是否会影响实际获得家庭帮助的情况。

方法

将 567 名在家庭中使用非正式或正式帮助的身体残疾人士的数据与 167 个城市的当地政策数据相关联。我们进行了多层次多项回归分析。由于我们预计当地政策对轻度或中度残疾人士、同居者和 75 岁以下人士的影响更大,因此我们在个体特征和地方政策特征之间纳入了跨层次交互项。

结果

研究结果揭示了各市政府在支持政策方面存在差异,以及各市政府在正式或非正式支持的使用方面存在差异。

结论

我们没有发现当地对非正式帮助的重视与非正式帮助的使用之间存在关系。可能的解释是:有些人的社交网络很小,使用非正式帮助的人没有申请市政府的支持,甚至不知道这种支持的存在。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验