文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Health Information Technology in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety: Literature Review.

作者信息

Feldman Sue S, Buchalter Scott, Hayes Leslie W

机构信息

Department of Health Services Adminstration, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Pulmonary and Critical Care, The University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Jun 4;6(2):e10264. doi: 10.2196/10264.


DOI:10.2196/10264
PMID:29866642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6006013/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The area of healthcare quality and patient safety is starting to use health information technology to prevent reportable events, identify them before they become issues, and act on events that are thought to be unavoidable. As healthcare organizations begin to explore the use of health information technology in this realm, it is often unclear where fiscal and human efforts should be focused. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to provide a foundation for understanding where to focus health information technology fiscal and human resources as well as expectations for the use of health information technology in healthcare quality and patient safety. METHODS: A literature review was conducted to identify peer-reviewed publications reporting on the actual use of health information technology in healthcare quality and patient safety. Inductive thematic analysis with open coding was used to categorize a total of 41 studies. Three pre-set categories were used: prevention, identification, and action. Three additional categories were formed through coding: challenges, outcomes, and location. RESULTS: This study identifies five main categories across seven study settings. A majority of the studies used health IT for identification and prevention of healthcare quality and patient safety issues. In this realm, alerts, clinical decision support, and customized health IT solutions were most often implemented. Implementation, interface design, and culture were most often noted as challenges. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable information as organizations determine where they stand to get the most "bang for their buck" relative to health IT for quality and patient safety. Knowing what implementations are being effectivity used by other organizations helps with fiscal and human resource planning as well as managing expectations relative to cost, scope, and outcomes. The findings from this scan of the literature suggest that having organizational champion leaders that can shepherd implementation, impact culture, and bridge knowledge with developers would be a valuable resource allocation to consider.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Health Information Technology in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety: Literature Review.

JMIR Med Inform. 2018-6-4

[2]
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-1

[3]
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.

Qatar Med J. 2019-11-7

[4]
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.

JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009

[5]
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-4

[6]
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?

Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008-3

[7]
Evidence-based management of ambulatory electronic health record system implementation: an assessment of conceptual support and qualitative evidence.

Int J Med Inform. 2014-7

[8]
Cost-Effectiveness and Affordability of Interventions, Policies, and Platforms for the Prevention and Treatment of Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders

2016-3-14

[9]

2017-8-25

[10]
Current challenges in health information technology-related patient safety.

Health Informatics J. 2020-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Connected Healthcare System Technology Interventions to Improve Patient Safety by Reducing Medical Errors: A Systematic Review.

Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024-12-30

[2]
AHRQ's digital healthcare research program: 20 years of advancing innovation and discovery.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024-11-1

[3]
Advancements in ambulatory care pharmacy practice in Saudi Arabia: A comprehensive review of innovations and best practices at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare.

Saudi Pharm J. 2024-10

[4]
Information Technology Ambidexterity, Digital Dynamic Capability, and Knowledge Processes as Enablers of Patient Agility: Empirical Study.

JMIRx Med. 2021-12-6

[5]
Development and Validation of SafeHIT: An Instrument to Assess the Self-Reported Safe Use of Health Information Technology.

Appl Clin Inform. 2023-8

[6]
Complex implementation mechanisms in primary care: do physicians' beliefs about the effectiveness of innovation play a mediating role? Applying a realist inquiry and structural equation modeling approach in a formative evaluation study.

BMC Prim Care. 2023-6-27

[7]
Development of the information quality scale for health information supply chain type 2 diabetes mellitus management using exploratory factor analysis.

J Public Health Res. 2023-5-8

[8]
The Role of Access Type and Age Group in the Breadth of Use of Patient Portals: Observational Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2022-12-27

[9]
Nurse-led consultations reinforced with eHealth technology: a qualitative study of the experiences of patients with gynecological cancer.

BMC Nurs. 2022-11-25

[10]
Using automated methods to detect safety problems with health information technology: a scoping review.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023-1-18

本文引用的文献

[1]
Improving Quality Improvement in Neonatal-Perinatal Care.

Clin Perinatol. 2017-9

[2]
Protocol for a multicentre, multistage, prospective study in China using system-based approaches for consistent improvement in surgical safety.

BMJ Open. 2017-6-15

[3]
Five things to know about diagnostic error.

Diagnosis (Berl). 2017-3

[4]
External Quality Assessment beyond the analytical phase: an Australian perspective.

Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017-2-15

[5]
The impact of secure messaging on workflow in primary care: Results of a multiple-case, multiple-method study.

Int J Med Inform. 2017-4

[6]
Telemedicine to Promote Patient Safety: Use of Phone-Based Interactive Voice-Response System to Reduce Adverse Safety Events in Pre-dialysis CKD.

Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2017-1

[7]
Engineering technology resilience through informatics safety science.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017-3-1

[8]
Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017-3-1

[9]
Transformational Impact of Health Information Technology on the Clinical Practice of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2017-1

[10]
Improving Evaluation to Address the Unintended Consequences of Health Information Technology:. a Position Paper from the Working Group on Technology Assessment & Quality Development.

Yearb Med Inform. 2016-11-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索