Suppr超能文献

[死因统计与国际疾病分类,何去何从?]

[Cause-of-death statistics and ICD, quo vadis?].

作者信息

Eckert Olaf, Vogel Ulrich

机构信息

Referat H101 Gesundheitsstatistiken, Statistisches Bundesamt, Graurheindorfer Straße 198, 53117, Bonn, Deutschland.

Referat M3 Medizinische Begriffssysteme, Deutsches Institut für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information, Köln, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018 Jul;61(7):796-805. doi: 10.1007/s00103-018-2756-5.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) is the worldwide binding standard for generating underlying cause-of-death statistics.

OBJECTIVES

What are the effects of former revisions of the ICD on underlying cause-of-death statistics and which opportunities and challenges are becoming apparent in a possible transition process from ICD-10 to ICD-11?This article presents the calculation of the exploitation grade of ICD-9 and ICD-10 in the German cause-of-death statistics and quality of documentation. Approximately 67,000 anonymized German death certificates are processed by Iris/MUSE and official German cause-of-death statistics are analyzed.In addition to substantial changes in the exploitation grade in the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10, regional effects become visible. The rate of so-called "ill-defined" conditions exceeds 10%.Despite substantial improvement of ICD revisions there are long-known deficits in the coroner's inquest, filling death certificates and quality of coding. To make better use of the ICD as a methodological framework for mortality statistics and health reporting in Germany, the following measures are necessary: 1. General use of Iris/MUSE, 2. Establishing multiple underlying cause-of-death statistics, 3. Introduction of an electronic death certificate, 4. Improvement of the medical assessment of cause of death.Within short time the WHO will release the 11th revision of the ICD that will provide additional opportunities for the development of underlying cause-of-death statistics and their use in science, public health and politics. A coordinated effort including participants in the process and users is necessary to meet the related challenges.

摘要

未标注

《国际疾病和相关健康问题统计分类》(ICD)是生成根本死因统计数据的全球具有约束力的标准。

目的

ICD以前的修订对根本死因统计有哪些影响,以及在从ICD - 10向ICD - 11的可能过渡过程中出现了哪些机遇和挑战?本文介绍了ICD - 9和ICD - 10在德国死因统计中的利用程度计算以及文档质量。鸢尾花/缪斯系统处理了大约67000份匿名的德国死亡证明,并对德国官方死因统计进行了分析。

从ICD - 9过渡到ICD - 10不仅利用程度有大幅变化,区域影响也很明显。所谓“定义不明确”情况的发生率超过10%。

尽管ICD修订有了很大改进,但在验尸官调查、填写死亡证明和编码质量方面仍存在长期存在的缺陷。为了更好地将ICD用作德国死亡率统计和健康报告的方法框架,需要采取以下措施:1. 普遍使用鸢尾花/缪斯系统;2. 建立多个根本死因统计;3. 引入电子死亡证明;4. 改进死因的医学评估。

世界卫生组织将在短时间内发布ICD的第11版修订本,这将为根本死因统计的发展及其在科学、公共卫生和政治中的应用提供更多机会。需要包括该过程参与者和用户在内的各方共同努力来应对相关挑战。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验