a School of Biological Sciences , Victoria University of Wellington , Wellington , New Zealand.
b Wellington Cardiovascular Research Group , Wellington , New Zealand.
Platelets. 2019;30(5):599-607. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2018.1479520. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
Platelet activation underlies the pathology of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is administered post-AMI to limit this activation. Platelets express Toll-like receptors (TLRs) 1, 2, and 4 and become potently activated in response to TLR2/1 and TLR4 stimulation. However, it is unknown whether antiplatelet agents can protect against platelet activation via these TLR pathways. This study aimed to determine the extent to which TLR-mediated platelet activation can be inhibited by currently used antiplatelet agents. Ten healthy subjects were enrolled into a single-blinded randomized cross-over trial. Subjects received either aspirin monotherapy or DAPT (aspirin in combination with ticagrelor) for 1 week, were washed out, and crossed over to the other drug regimen. Platelet activation was assessed in response to Pam3CSK4 (a TLR2/1 agonist) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS; a TLR4 agonist) at baseline and after each antiplatelet drug regimen. Platelet-surface expression of CD62p and PAC1 by flow cytometry was measured as markers of platelet activation. At baseline, expression of CD62p and PAC1 increased significantly in response to high-dose LPS and in a dose-dependent manner in response to Pam3CSK4. Aspirin monotherapy did not inhibit platelet activation in response to any TLR agonist tested. DAPT with aspirin and ticagrelor only modestly inhibited expression of both activation markers in response to high doses of Pam3CSK4 and LPS. However, incubation with these TLR agonists led to substantial platelet activation despite treatment with these anti-platelet agents. Platelet-TLR2/1 and platelet-TLR4 represent intact on-treatment platelet activation pathways, which may contribute to on-going platelet activation post-AMI.
血小板激活是急性心肌梗死(AMI)的病理基础,AMI 后给予双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)以限制这种激活。血小板表达 Toll 样受体(TLR)1、2 和 4,对 TLR2/1 和 TLR4 刺激会发生强烈激活。然而,尚不清楚抗血小板药物是否可以通过这些 TLR 途径来保护血小板免受激活。本研究旨在确定目前使用的抗血小板药物在多大程度上可以抑制 TLR 介导的血小板激活。10 名健康受试者被纳入一项单盲随机交叉试验。受试者接受阿司匹林单药治疗或 DAPT(阿司匹林联合替格瑞洛)治疗 1 周,洗脱后交叉至另一种药物治疗方案。在基线和每种抗血小板药物治疗方案后,通过流式细胞术评估血小板对 Pam3CSK4(TLR2/1 激动剂)和脂多糖(LPS;TLR4 激动剂)的激活。通过流式细胞术测量血小板表面 CD62p 和 PAC1 的表达作为血小板激活的标志物。在基线时,高剂量 LPS 和 Pam3CSK4 剂量依赖性地使 CD62p 和 PAC1 的表达显著增加。阿司匹林单药治疗不能抑制任何 TLR 激动剂测试引起的血小板激活。阿司匹林和替格瑞洛的 DAPT 仅轻度抑制高剂量 Pam3CSK4 和 LPS 引起的两种激活标志物的表达。然而,尽管用这些抗血小板药物治疗,这些 TLR 激动剂仍导致大量血小板激活。血小板-TLR2/1 和血小板-TLR4 代表治疗中完整的血小板激活途径,这可能导致 AMI 后持续的血小板激活。