• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替格瑞洛联合或不联合阿司匹林对血小板反应性和凝血激活的影响差异:一项在健康志愿者中的随机试验。

Differential Effects of Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin on Platelet Reactivity and Coagulation Activation: A Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers.

机构信息

Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Feb;107(2):415-422. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1616. Epub 2019 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1002/cpt.1616
PMID:31442298
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7006887/
Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is standard in acute coronary heart disease but confers a bleeding risk. To compare the effects of ticagrelor-monotherapy with ticagrelor-based DAPT on hemostatic system activation, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in 44 volunteers using a loading-dose regimen and measured platelet-aggregometry triggered by adenosine diphosphate (multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA)-ADP) and arachidonic acid (MEA-AA), the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), prothrombin fragment 1.2 (f1.2), and d-Dimer. Ticagrelor-based DAPT and ticagrelor-monotherapy significantly decreased MEA-ADP (Δmean: -51.4 (-56.9; -45.8) and -46.2 (-51.7; -40.7)) and VASP (Δmean: -70.3 (-76.2; -64.4) and -69.6 (-75.5; -63.7)) at 2 hours and over 24 hours. MEA-AA was reduced significantly by both treatments (Δmean: -72.9 (-80.6; -65.3) and -25.7 (-33.3; -18.0)) at 2 hours, and stronger by ticagrelor-based DAPT over 24 hours. Both treatments decreased f1.2 (geometric mean ratio (GMR): 0.92 (0.84; 1.01) and 0.88 (0.80; 0.96)) and d-Dimer (GMR: 0.89 (0.86; 0.92) and 0.91 (0.88; 0.94)) at 2 hours and d-Dimer over 24 hours. Ticagrelor-monotherapy and ticagrelor-based DAPT comparably affect hemostatic system activation.

摘要

双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)是急性冠状动脉心脏病的标准治疗方法,但会增加出血风险。为了比较替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛为基础的 DAPT 对止血系统激活的影响,我们在 44 名志愿者中进行了一项随机对照试验,使用负荷剂量方案,并通过二磷酸腺苷(MEA-ADP)和花生四烯酸(MEA-AA)、血管扩张刺激磷蛋白(VASP)、凝血酶原片段 1.2(f1.2)和 D-二聚体测量血小板聚集诱导试验(MEA)。替格瑞洛为基础的 DAPT 和替格瑞洛单药治疗均能显著降低 MEA-ADP(Δ均值:-51.4(-56.9;-45.8)和-46.2(-51.7;-40.7))和 VASP(Δ均值:-70.3(-76.2;-64.4)和-69.6(-75.5;-63.7))在 2 小时和 24 小时以上。两种治疗方法均能显著降低 MEA-AA(Δ均值:-72.9(-80.6;-65.3)和-25.7(-33.3;-18.0))在 2 小时内,替格瑞洛为基础的 DAPT 在 24 小时以上的效果更强。两种治疗方法均能降低 f1.2(几何均数比(GMR):0.92(0.84;1.01)和 0.88(0.80;0.96))和 D-二聚体(GMR:0.89(0.86;0.92)和 0.91(0.88;0.94))在 2 小时内和 D-二聚体在 24 小时内。替格瑞洛单药治疗和替格瑞洛为基础的 DAPT 对止血系统的激活有相似的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3ef/7006887/d5040e0b10c5/CPT-107-415-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3ef/7006887/88a2d8cc048b/CPT-107-415-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3ef/7006887/9d3823050fa4/CPT-107-415-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3ef/7006887/d5040e0b10c5/CPT-107-415-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3ef/7006887/88a2d8cc048b/CPT-107-415-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3ef/7006887/9d3823050fa4/CPT-107-415-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3ef/7006887/d5040e0b10c5/CPT-107-415-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Differential Effects of Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin on Platelet Reactivity and Coagulation Activation: A Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers.替格瑞洛联合或不联合阿司匹林对血小板反应性和凝血激活的影响差异:一项在健康志愿者中的随机试验。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Feb;107(2):415-422. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1616. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
2
Differential Effects of Clopidogrel With or Without Aspirin on Platelet Reactivity and Coagulation Activation: A Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers.氯吡格雷联合或不联合阿司匹林对血小板反应性和凝血激活的影响:一项健康志愿者的随机试验。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jun;109(6):1546-1554. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2106. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
3
Comparison of Light Transmission Aggregometry With Impedance Aggregometry in Patients on Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors.在强效 P2Y12 抑制剂治疗的患者中,比较光传输聚集与阻抗聚集。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2021 May;26(3):260-268. doi: 10.1177/1074248420968706. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
4
The effects of aspirin and ticagrelor on Toll-like receptor (TLR)-mediated platelet activation: results of a randomized, cross-over trial.阿司匹林和替格瑞洛对 Toll 样受体(TLR)介导的血小板激活的影响:一项随机、交叉试验的结果。
Platelets. 2019;30(5):599-607. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2018.1479520. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
5
Recovery of platelet reactivity following cessation of either aspirin or ticagrelor in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a GLOBAL LEADERS substudy.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后接受双联抗血小板治疗的患者停用阿司匹林或替格瑞洛后血小板反应性的恢复:GLOBAL LEADERS 子研究。
Platelets. 2022 Jan 2;33(1):141-146. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2020.1863937. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
6
Serum uric acid levels during dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor or clopidogrel: Results from a single-centre study.替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗期间的血清尿酸水平:一项单中心研究的结果
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Jul;26(7):567-574. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
7
Platelet reactivity in response to aspirin and ticagrelor in African-Americans and European-Americans.非裔美国人和欧洲裔美国人对阿司匹林和替格瑞洛反应的血小板活性。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Feb;51(2):249-259. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02327-w. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
8
Platelet aggregation and clot formation in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest treated with induced hypothermia and dual platelet inhibition with aspirin and ticagrelor; a prospective observational study.心脏骤停昏迷幸存者接受亚低温治疗及阿司匹林和替格瑞洛双重血小板抑制后的血小板聚集与血栓形成:一项前瞻性观察研究
Crit Care. 2014 Sep 30;18(5):495. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0495-z.
9
Cross validation of the Multiple Electrode Aggregometry. A prospective trial in healthy volunteers.多电极凝集测定法的交叉验证:一项针对健康志愿者的前瞻性试验。
Thromb Haemost. 2009 Aug;102(2):397-403. doi: 10.1160/TH08-10-0669.
10
Morphine decreases ticagrelor concentrations but not its antiplatelet effects: a randomized trial in healthy volunteers.吗啡可降低替格瑞洛浓度,但不影响其抗血小板作用:一项在健康志愿者中的随机试验。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2016 Jan;46(1):7-14. doi: 10.1111/eci.12550. Epub 2015 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual antiplatelet therapy in GI-bleed patients with extensive coronary artery disease history: a systematic review.有广泛冠状动脉疾病史的胃肠道出血患者的双重抗血小板治疗:一项系统评价
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Apr 25;87(6):3715-3735. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002833. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Evaluation of the antiplatelet effect of generic ticagrelor 90 mg (ticaspan ® ) alone and in combination with aspirin 75 mg as compared to ticagrelor (innovator): An in vitro study.评价替格瑞洛仿制药 90mg(ticaspan®)单用和联合阿司匹林 75mg 与替格瑞洛(原研药)的抗血小板作用:一项体外研究。
J Postgrad Med. 2024 Jul 1;70(3):129-134. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_346_23. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months vs aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial.替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗 1 个月,随后替格瑞洛单药治疗 23 个月,与阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛治疗 12 个月,随后药物洗脱支架植入后阿司匹林单药治疗 12 个月:一项多中心、开放标签、随机优效性试验。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 15;392(10151):940-949. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31858-0. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
2
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.
3
Plasma levels of platelet-enriched microRNAs change during antiplatelet therapy in healthy subjects.
健康受试者在抗血小板治疗期间,富含血小板的微小RNA的血浆水平会发生变化。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Dec 12;13:1078722. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1078722. eCollection 2022.
4
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Antiplatelet Therapy, and Bleeding: A Clinical Perspective.急性冠状动脉综合征、抗血小板治疗与出血:临床视角
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 1;9(7):2064. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072064.
5
Ticagrelor and prasugrel are independent predictors of improved long-term survival in ACS patients.替格瑞洛和普拉格雷可独立预测 ACS 患者长期生存改善。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Nov;50(11):e13304. doi: 10.1111/eci.13304. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
6
Can Ticagrelor be used to prevent sepsis-induced coagulopathy in COVID-19?替格瑞洛能否用于预防新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)中的脓毒症诱导的凝血病?
Clin Immunol. 2020 Jul;216:108468. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108468. Epub 2020 May 21.
Aspirin-free strategies in cardiovascular disease and cardioembolic stroke prevention.阿司匹林-free 策略在心脑血管疾病和心源性卒中预防中的应用。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018 Aug;15(8):480-496. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0049-1.
4
Effect of Ticagrelor Plus Aspirin, Ticagrelor Alone, or Aspirin Alone on Saphenous Vein Graft Patency 1 Year After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Clinical Trial.替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林、替格瑞洛单药或阿司匹林单药对冠状动脉旁路移植术后 1 年大隐静脉桥通畅率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Apr 24;319(16):1677-1686. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3197.
5
Ticagrelor - toward more efficient platelet inhibition and beyond.替格瑞洛——迈向更有效的血小板抑制及其他方面。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Jan 17;14:129-140. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S152369. eCollection 2018.
6
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
7
Advocating cardiovascular precision medicine with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors.倡导使用 P2Y12 受体抑制剂的心血管精准医学。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2017 Oct 1;3(4):221-234. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvw044.
8
Crushed sublingual versus oral ticagrelor administration strategies in patients with unstable angina. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study.不稳定型心绞痛患者中舌下含服与口服替格瑞洛给药策略的比较:一项药代动力学/药效学研究
Thromb Haemost. 2017 Apr 3;117(4):718-726. doi: 10.1160/TH16-08-0670. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
9
Effects of autologous platelet transfusion on platelet inhibition in ticagrelor-treated and clopidogrel-treated subjects.替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷治疗患者中自体血小板输注对血小板抑制的影响。
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Dec;14(12):2342-2352. doi: 10.1111/jth.13511. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
10
Acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死。
Lancet. 2017 Jan 14;389(10065):197-210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30677-8. Epub 2016 Aug 5.