Klitzman Robert
Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive #15, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Jun 5;18(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0572-6.
Infertility patients generally see provider-patient communication and relationships as important, but as often insufficient, raising critical questions regarding why these gaps persist, and how they might best be addressed.
Semi-structured interviews of approximately one hour each were conducted with 37 ART providers and patients (17 physicians, 10 other health providers, and 10 patients) and were thematically analyzed.
Patients see clinicians' interactions as ranging widely from good to bad, related to several specific barriers and factors. Patients and providers may differ in their physical and emotional experiences, expectations concerning treatment outcomes and uncertainties, and time frames and finances, generating dynamic processes and tensions. Characteristics of particular providers, clinics and patients can also vary. Infertility patients tend to find only one outcome acceptable - a "take home baby" - rather than partial success, as is the case with many other diseases. Yet most IVF cycles fail. Many patients must pay considerable out-of-pocket expenses for infertility treatment, exacerbating disappointments and frustrations. Providers often work in competitive, entrepreneurial markets, and "hype" their potential success. After treatment failures, providers may feel guilty and withdraw from patients. Yet these behaviors can antagonize patients more than physicians realize, aggravating patient stresses. Several providers described how they understood patients' needs and perceptions more fully only after becoming infertility patients themselves. Interactions with not only physicians, but other providers (e.g., nurses and staff) can play key roles. Patients may be willing to understand these impediments, but providers often communicate these obstacles and reasons poorly or not at all, furthering tensions.
These data, the first to examine several critical aspects of challenges that infertility providers and patients face in communication and relationships, suggest that several key dynamic processes and factors may be involved, and need to be addressed. While prior research has shown that infertility patients value, but often feel disappointed in relationships with clinicians, the present data highlight several specific impediments, and thus have critical implications for future practice, research, guidelines and education.
不孕不育患者普遍认为医患沟通及关系很重要,但往往觉得沟通不足,这就引发了一些关键问题,比如为何这些差距依然存在,以及如何才能最好地解决这些问题。
对37位辅助生殖技术(ART)提供者和患者(17名医生、10名其他医疗服务提供者和10名患者)进行了每人约一小时的半结构化访谈,并进行了主题分析。
患者认为临床医生的互动情况好坏差异很大,这与几个特定的障碍和因素有关。患者和提供者在身体和情感体验、对治疗结果的期望和不确定性以及时间框架和财务状况等方面可能存在差异,从而产生动态过程和紧张关系。特定提供者、诊所和患者的特征也可能各不相同。不孕不育患者往往只接受一种结果——“抱回家一个宝宝”,而不像许多其他疾病那样接受部分成功。然而,大多数试管婴儿周期都会失败。许多患者必须为不孕不育治疗支付相当可观的自付费用,这加剧了失望和沮丧情绪。提供者通常在竞争激烈的创业市场中工作,并“炒作”他们潜在的成功。治疗失败后,提供者可能会感到内疚并与患者疏远。然而,这些行为对患者的伤害可能比医生意识到的更大,加剧了患者的压力。几位提供者描述了他们自己成为不孕不育患者后才更充分地理解患者的需求和看法。不仅与医生的互动,与其他提供者(如护士和工作人员)的互动也可以发挥关键作用。患者可能愿意理解这些障碍,但提供者往往很少或根本不说明这些障碍和原因,从而加剧了紧张关系。
这些数据首次审视了不孕不育提供者和患者在沟通及关系方面面临的挑战的几个关键方面,表明可能涉及几个关键的动态过程和因素,需要加以解决。虽然先前的研究表明不孕不育患者重视与临床医生的关系,但往往感到失望,但目前的数据突出了几个具体障碍,并因此对未来的实践、研究、指南和教育具有关键意义。