Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Respiratory, Critical Care and Anaesthesia, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Nov;103(11):1080-1084. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314997. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
The use of long-term ventilation (LTV) in children is growing in the UK and worldwide. This reflects the improvement in technology to provide LTV, the growing number of indications in which it can be successfully delivered and the acceptability of LTV to families and children. In this article, we discuss the various considerations to be made when deciding to initiate or continue LTV, describe the process that be followed, as decided by a consensus of experienced physicians, and outline the options available for resolution of conflict around LTV decision making. We recognise the uncertainty and hope provided by novel and evolving therapies for potential disease modification. This raises the question of whether LTV should be offered to allow time for a therapy to be trialled, or whether the therapy is unlikely to be effective, LTV would simply prolong suffering. We put this consensus view forward as an ethical framework for decision making in children requiring LTV.
在英国和全球范围内,儿童长期通气(LTV)的使用正在增加。这反映了提供 LTV 的技术不断改进,它可以成功应用的适应症越来越多,以及 LTV 对家庭和儿童的可接受性。在本文中,我们讨论了在决定启动或继续 LTV 时需要考虑的各种因素,描述了由经验丰富的医生达成共识所决定的遵循的流程,并概述了在 LTV 决策方面解决冲突的各种选择。我们认识到新型和不断发展的治疗方法在潜在疾病修饰方面带来的不确定性和希望。这就提出了一个问题,即是否应该提供 LTV,以便有时间尝试治疗,或者治疗是否不太可能有效,而 LTV 只会延长痛苦。我们提出这一共识观点作为需要 LTV 的儿童决策的伦理框架。