Mack Cheryl, Mailo Janette, Ofosu Daniel, Hinai Alreem A, Keto-Lambert Diana, Soril Lesley J J, van Manen Michael, Castro-Codesal Maria
Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2024 May;59(5):1153-1164. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26884. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
An increasing number of children are surviving critical illnesses requiring tracheostomy/long-term ventilation (LTV). This scoping review seeks to collate the available evidence on decision-making for tracheostomy/LTV in children. Systematic searches of electronic databases and websites were conducted for articles and reports. Inclusion criteria included: (1) children 0-18 years old; (2) described use of tracheostomy or tracheostomy/LTV; and (3) information on recommendations for tracheostomy decision-making or decision-making experiences of family-caregivers or health care providers. Articles not written in English were excluded. Of the 4463 records identified through database search and other methods, a total of 84 articles, 2 dissertations, 1 book chapter, 3 consensus statement/society guidelines, and 8 pieces of grey literature were included. Main thematic domains identified were: (1) legal and moral standards for decision-making; (2) decision-making models, roles of decision-makers, and decisional aids towards a shared decision-making model; (3) experiences and perspectives of decision-makers; (4) health system and society considerations; and (5) conflict resolution and legal considerations. A high degree of uncertainty and complexity is involved in tracheostomy/LTV decision-making. There is a need for a standardized decision-support process that is consistent with a child's best interests and shared decision-making. Strategies for optimizing communication and mechanism for managing disputes are needed.
越来越多患有需要气管切开术/长期通气(LTV)的危重症儿童得以存活。本范围综述旨在整理关于儿童气管切开术/LTV决策的现有证据。我们对电子数据库和网站进行了系统检索,以查找文章和报告。纳入标准包括:(1)0至18岁儿童;(2)描述了气管切开术或气管切开术/LTV的使用情况;(3)有关气管切开术决策建议或家庭照顾者或医疗保健提供者决策经验的信息。非英文撰写的文章被排除。通过数据库搜索和其他方法识别出的4463条记录中,总共纳入了84篇文章、2篇学位论文、1章书籍内容、3份共识声明/学会指南以及8份灰色文献。确定的主要主题领域包括:(1)决策的法律和道德标准;(2)决策模型、决策者的角色以及迈向共同决策模型的决策辅助工具;(3)决策者的经验和观点;(4)卫生系统和社会考量;(5)冲突解决和法律考量。气管切开术/LTV决策涉及高度的不确定性和复杂性。需要一个符合儿童最大利益并与共同决策相一致的标准化决策支持流程。还需要优化沟通的策略和管理争议的机制。