Suppr超能文献

儿童长期通气决策。儿科家庭通气项目主任的观点。

Decisions around Long-term Ventilation for Children. Perspectives of Directors of Pediatric Home Ventilation Programs.

机构信息

1 Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University College of Physician and Surgeons, New York, New York.

2 Critical Care Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(10):1539-1547. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-1002OC.

Abstract

RATIONALE

The decision of whether to initiate or forgo long-term ventilation (LTV) for children with life-limiting conditions can be complex and impactful. Providers are responsible for helping families to understand the consequences of their options and guiding them through shared decision-making, but little has been published on how to do this.

OBJECTIVES

To assess how directors of pediatric home ventilation programs facilitate shared decision-making with families facing decisions of whether to initiate or forgo LTV for their children with life-limiting conditions. In addition, to assess directors' perspectives on these families' decisional needs.

METHODS

Purposeful recruiting of directors/codirectors of pediatric home ventilation programs at children's hospitals was used. We performed semistructured interviews using an open-ended interview guide developed de novo to assess their approach to informed, shared decision-making around LTV and their perspectives on these decisions. Qualitative data analysis was conducted using a thematic approach based on framework analysis in which thematic saturation was achieved.

RESULTS

A sample of 15 experienced physician directors across North America was interviewed. All (15/15) inform families of the potential benefits and burdens/risks of LTV for the child and of the option to forgo LTV. All stress to families the physical, emotional, and social impact of caring for a child using LTV on the family; 12 directors also highlight the financial impact. All recommend that decision-making around LTV should be interdisciplinary, initiated early, and not rushed; nine described their approach as guided by the family's goals for the child and their family. All recommend that providers be transparent, candid, active listeners, and supportive. All directors believe that the family's decision should be respected, but vary in the extent to which they recommend an option to families. They described barriers to decision-making that stem from families, providers, and other sources.

CONCLUSIONS

As providers who follow children using LTV, directors of pediatric home ventilation programs have perspectives regarding the decisional needs of these families and how to meet them that can help inform and shape the practices of other providers who assist families facing this decision.

摘要

背景

对于患有危及生命疾病的儿童,是否启动或放弃长期通气(LTV)的决策可能非常复杂且影响深远。提供者有责任帮助家庭了解其选择的后果,并指导他们进行共同决策,但关于如何做到这一点的研究甚少。

目的

评估儿科家庭通气项目主任如何帮助面临是否为其患有危及生命疾病的儿童启动或放弃 LTV 的家庭进行共同决策。此外,评估主任对这些家庭决策需求的看法。

方法

采用有目的地招募儿童医院儿科家庭通气项目主任/副主任。我们使用了新开发的开放式访谈指南进行半结构式访谈,以评估他们在 LTV 方面进行知情、共同决策的方法以及他们对这些决策的看法。采用基于框架分析的主题方法进行定性数据分析,主题饱和度得以实现。

结果

对来自北美的 15 名经验丰富的医师主任进行了访谈。所有(15/15)主任都向家庭告知 LTV 对儿童的潜在益处和负担/风险,以及放弃 LTV 的选择。所有人都向家庭强调了使用 LTV 照顾孩子对家庭的身体、情感和社会影响;12 位主任还强调了经济影响。所有人都建议围绕 LTV 的决策应跨学科进行,尽早启动,不要匆忙;9 位主任表示他们的方法以家庭对孩子及其家庭的目标为指导。所有人都建议提供者保持透明、坦诚、积极倾听和支持。所有主任都认为家庭的决定应该得到尊重,但在多大程度上向家庭推荐某种选择存在差异。他们描述了来自家庭、提供者和其他来源的决策障碍。

结论

作为长期跟随 LTV 儿童的提供者,儿科家庭通气项目主任对这些家庭的决策需求以及满足这些需求的方法有自己的看法,这有助于为协助面临这一决策的家庭的其他提供者提供信息并塑造其实践。

相似文献

1
Decisions around Long-term Ventilation for Children. Perspectives of Directors of Pediatric Home Ventilation Programs.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(10):1539-1547. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-1002OC.
2
Decisions for Long-Term Ventilation for Children. Perspectives of Family Members.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Jan;17(1):72-80. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201903-271OC.
3
Towards developing an ethical framework for decision making in long-term ventilation in children.
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Nov;103(11):1080-1084. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314997. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
4
Development and validation of a novel informational booklet for pediatric long-term ventilation decision support.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 May;56(5):1198-1204. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25221. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
6
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
7
Parent perspectives on facilitating decision-making around pediatric home ventilation.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022 Feb;57(2):567-575. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25749. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
8
Family Experiences Deciding For and Against Pediatric Home Ventilation.
J Pediatr. 2021 Feb;229:223-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.10.014. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
9
Going home: Clinician perspectives on decision-making in paediatric home mechanical ventilation.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2023 Mar;59(3):499-504. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16333. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
10
Evaluation of candidates for long-term ventilation.
Respir Care Clin N Am. 2002 Sep;8(3):405-18, vi. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5337(02)00031-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Home Health Care Research for Children With Disability and Medical Complexity.
Pediatrics. 2025 Feb 1;155(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-067966.
3
Palliative care for children: methodology for the development of a national clinical practice guideline.
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Dec 1;22(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01293-3.
4
5
Shared decision-making experiences in child long-term ventilation: a systematic review.
Eur Respir Rev. 2023 Aug 23;32(169). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0098-2023. Print 2023 Sep 30.
6
Long-Term Ventilation in Children with Medical Complexity: A Challenging Issue.
Children (Basel). 2022 Nov 5;9(11):1700. doi: 10.3390/children9111700.
7
8
Tracheostomy decision-making for children with medical complexity: What supports and resources do caregivers need?
Palliat Support Care. 2024 Aug;22(4):776-782. doi: 10.1017/S1478951522001122.
9
Initiating technology dependence to sustain a child's life: a systematic review of reasons.
J Med Ethics. 2022 Dec;48(12):1068-1075. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107099. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
10
Development and validation of a novel informational booklet for pediatric long-term ventilation decision support.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 May;56(5):1198-1204. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25221. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Physician driven variation in the care of children with spinal muscular atrophy type 1.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017 May;52(5):662-668. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23616. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
2
Children and Young Adults Who Received Tracheostomies or Were Initiated on Long-Term Ventilation in PICUs.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Aug;17(8):e324-34. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000844.
3
Decision making in long-term ventilation for children.
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Oct;3(10):745-6. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00377-X.
4
The use of family conferences in the pediatric intensive care unit.
J Palliat Med. 2013 Dec;16(12):1595-601. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0284. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
5
Spinal muscular atrophy type I: do the benefits of ventilation compensate for its burdens?
J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 Oct;49(10):807-12. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12386.
6
Management of children with spinal muscular atrophy type 1 in Australia.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 Oct;49(10):815-9. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12291. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
7
Parental perception of functional status following tracheostomy in infancy: a single center study.
J Pediatr. 2013 Sep;163(3):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.03.075. Epub 2013 May 6.
8
Survival of patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1.
Pediatrics. 2013 May;131(5):e1509-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2278. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
9
Communication regarding breathing support options for youth with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Paediatr Child Health. 2011 Aug;16(7):395-8. doi: 10.1093/pch/16.7.395.
10
International survey of physician recommendation for tracheostomy for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type I.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012 Jun;47(6):606-11. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21617. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验