• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在阅读教学开始前后,通过动态解码评估预测阅读障碍:一项从幼儿园到二年级的纵向研究。

Predicting reading disabilities using dynamic assessment of decoding before and after the onset of reading instruction: a longitudinal study from kindergarten through grade 2.

作者信息

Gellert Anna S, Elbro Carsten

机构信息

Centre for Reading Research, Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen, Emil Holms Kanal 2, DK-2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark.

出版信息

Ann Dyslexia. 2018 Jul;68(2):126-144. doi: 10.1007/s11881-018-0159-9. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11881-018-0159-9
PMID:29872949
Abstract

The present study examined the predictive validity of a dynamic test of decoding in which participants are taught three novel letters and how to synthesize the corresponding letter sounds into new words. One version of this dynamic test was administered to 158 kindergarten children before the onset of formal reading instruction along with traditional predictors of reading. Similarly, a parallel version of the dynamic test was administered to the same children after a few months of formal reading instruction. At the end of grade 2, the children were assessed on outcome measures of reading and categorized as having disabilities with either accuracy or fluency measures. Administered before as well as after the onset of formal reading instruction, the dynamic test of decoding contributed uniquely to the prediction of difficulties with reading accuracy at the end of grade 2 after control for traditional predictors of reading. Difficulties with reading fluency were also predicted by the dynamic decoding test, but the unique prediction value was more limited. This study showed that a dynamic assessment of decoding can be a useful addition to traditional test batteries for early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities. Even when taken before formal reading instruction, a combination of the dynamic assessment and two traditional measures (letter knowledge and rapid automatized naming) yielded a very high prediction accuracy of reading difficulties at the end of grade 2.

摘要

本研究考察了一种解码动态测试的预测效度,在该测试中,参与者要学习三个新字母,并学习如何将相应的字母发音合成新单词。在正式阅读教学开始前,对158名幼儿园儿童进行了该动态测试的一个版本,同时还进行了传统的阅读预测指标测试。同样,在几个月的正式阅读教学后,对这些儿童进行了该动态测试的一个平行版本。在二年级末,对儿童的阅读结果指标进行评估,并根据准确性或流畅性指标将他们归类为有阅读障碍。解码动态测试在正式阅读教学开始之前和之后都进行了,在控制了传统阅读预测指标后,它对预测二年级末的阅读准确性困难有独特的贡献。解码动态测试也能预测阅读流畅性方面的困难,但其独特的预测价值较为有限。这项研究表明,解码动态评估可以作为传统测试组合的有益补充,用于早期识别有阅读障碍风险的儿童。即使在正式阅读教学之前进行,动态评估与两项传统指标(字母知识和快速自动命名)相结合,也能在二年级末对阅读困难产生非常高的预测准确率。

相似文献

1
Predicting reading disabilities using dynamic assessment of decoding before and after the onset of reading instruction: a longitudinal study from kindergarten through grade 2.在阅读教学开始前后,通过动态解码评估预测阅读障碍:一项从幼儿园到二年级的纵向研究。
Ann Dyslexia. 2018 Jul;68(2):126-144. doi: 10.1007/s11881-018-0159-9. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
2
Does a Dynamic Test of Phonological Awareness Predict Early Reading Difficulties?语音意识动态测试能否预测早期阅读困难?
J Learn Disabil. 2017 May/Jun;50(3):227-237. doi: 10.1177/0022219415609185. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
3
Predicting Reading Difficulty in First Grade Using Dynamic Assessment of Decoding in Early Kindergarten: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study.利用幼儿园早期解码能力的动态评估预测一年级阅读难度:一项大规模纵向研究
J Learn Disabil. 2016 Mar-Apr;49(2):200-15. doi: 10.1177/0022219414538518. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
4
Predicting Reading Problems 6 Years Into the Future: Dynamic Assessment Reduces Bias and Increases Classification Accuracy.预测未来6年的阅读问题:动态评估可减少偏差并提高分类准确性。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Oct 24;49(4):875-888. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0021.
5
Word Decoding Development during Phonics Instruction in Children at Risk for Dyslexia.诵读困难风险儿童在语音教学过程中的单词解码发展
Dyslexia. 2017 May;23(2):141-160. doi: 10.1002/dys.1556.
6
Exploring How Initial Response to Instruction Predicts Morphology Outcomes Among Students With Decoding Difficulties.探讨初始教学反应如何预测解码困难学生的形态学结果。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Jul 15;51(3):655-670. doi: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00097.
7
The short- and long-term predictions of reading accuracy and speed from paired-associate learning.基于配对联想学习对阅读准确性和速度的短期及长期预测。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Oct;174:77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 Jun 17.
8
Beginning to Read in Vietnamese: Kindergarten Precursors to First Grade Fluency and Reading Comprehension.从越南语开始阅读:幼儿园阶段为一年级的流利阅读和阅读理解奠定基础。
Read Writ. 2021 Jan;34(1):139-169. doi: 10.1007/s11145-020-10066-w. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
9
The construct and predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of young children learning to read: implications for RTI frameworks.儿童阅读学习动态评估的构建与预测效度:对 RTI 框架的启示。
J Learn Disabil. 2011 Jul-Aug;44(4):339-47. doi: 10.1177/0022219411407864. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
10
Early identification of reading disabilities within an RTI framework.在回应干预(RTI)框架内对阅读障碍进行早期识别。
J Learn Disabil. 2015 May-Jun;48(3):281-97. doi: 10.1177/0022219413498115. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
A national test of dyslexia.全国性的诵读困难测试。
Ann Dyslexia. 2023 Oct;73(3):337-355. doi: 10.1007/s11881-023-00285-5. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
2
Dynamic Assessment for Identifying Spanish-Speaking English Learners' Risk for Mathematics Disabilities: Does Language of Administration Matter?动态评估识别西班牙语英语学习者数学学习障碍风险:评估语言是否重要?
J Learn Disabil. 2020 Sep/Oct;53(5):380-398. doi: 10.1177/0022219419898887. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
3
Performance in Sound-Symbol Learning Predicts Reading Performance 3 Years Later.
语音-符号学习表现可预测三年后的阅读表现。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 12;9:1716. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01716. eCollection 2018.