• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目的 生理测量而非主观报告调节饥饿对选择行为的影响。

Objective Physiological Measurements but Not Subjective Reports Moderate the Effect of Hunger on Choice Behavior.

作者信息

Shabat-Simon Maytal, Shuster Anastasia, Sela Tal, Levy Dino J

机构信息

Coller School of Management, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Ohalo College, Katzrin, Israel.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 May 23;9:750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00750. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00750
PMID:29875715
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5974553/
Abstract

Hunger is a powerful driver of human behavior, and is therefore of great interest to the study of psychology, economics, and consumer behavior. Assessing hunger levels in experiments is often biased, when using self-report methods, or complex, when using blood tests. We propose a novel way of objectively measuring subjects' levels of hunger by identifying levels of alpha-amylase (AA) enzyme in their saliva samples. We used this measure to uncover the effect of hunger on different types of choice behaviors. We found that hunger increases risk-seeking behavior in a lottery-choice task, modifies levels of vindictiveness in a social decision-making task, but does not have a detectible effect on economic inconsistency in a budget-set choice task. Importantly, these findings were moderated by AA levels and not by self-report measures. We demonstrate the effects hunger has on choice behavior and the problematic nature of subjective measures of physiological states, and propose to use reliable and valid biologically based methods to overcome these problems.

摘要

饥饿是人类行为的强大驱动力,因此在心理学、经济学和消费者行为研究中备受关注。在实验中评估饥饿程度时,使用自我报告方法往往存在偏差,而使用血液检测则较为复杂。我们提出了一种通过识别唾液样本中α-淀粉酶(AA)酶的水平来客观测量受试者饥饿程度的新方法。我们使用这种测量方法来揭示饥饿对不同类型选择行为的影响。我们发现,饥饿会增加彩票选择任务中的风险寻求行为,改变社会决策任务中的报复心水平,但在预算设定选择任务中对经济不一致性没有可检测到的影响。重要的是,这些发现受到AA水平的调节,而不是自我报告测量的调节。我们证明了饥饿对选择行为的影响以及生理状态主观测量的问题性质,并建议使用可靠且有效的基于生物学的方法来克服这些问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e2/5974553/b63b9974fc23/fpsyg-09-00750-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e2/5974553/37015085a1c7/fpsyg-09-00750-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e2/5974553/f8682e31eedf/fpsyg-09-00750-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e2/5974553/1552c6a143d6/fpsyg-09-00750-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e2/5974553/62a41acc4de0/fpsyg-09-00750-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e2/5974553/b63b9974fc23/fpsyg-09-00750-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e2/5974553/37015085a1c7/fpsyg-09-00750-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e2/5974553/f8682e31eedf/fpsyg-09-00750-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e2/5974553/1552c6a143d6/fpsyg-09-00750-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e2/5974553/62a41acc4de0/fpsyg-09-00750-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e2/5974553/b63b9974fc23/fpsyg-09-00750-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Objective Physiological Measurements but Not Subjective Reports Moderate the Effect of Hunger on Choice Behavior.目的 生理测量而非主观报告调节饥饿对选择行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 23;9:750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00750. eCollection 2018.
2
Risky decision-making after exposure to a food-choice task in excess weight adolescents: Relationships with reward-related impulsivity and hunger.超重青少年暴露于食物选择任务后冒险决策的研究:与奖赏冲动性和饥饿感的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 24;13(8):e0202994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202994. eCollection 2018.
3
Mild hunger elicits attentional desensitization to visual food cues in healthy, non-obese individuals.轻度饥饿会引发健康、非肥胖个体对视觉食物线索的注意力脱敏。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 9;15:1441184. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1441184. eCollection 2024.
4
The Hunger Games: Using hunger to promote healthy choices in self-control conflicts.饥饿游戏:利用饥饿促进自我控制冲突中的健康选择。
Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:401-409. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 May 11.
5
Hunger enhances consistent economic choices in non-human primates.饥饿增强了非人类灵长类动物一致的经济选择。
Sci Rep. 2017 May 24;7(1):2394. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02417-5.
6
The impact of hunger on indulgent food choices is moderated by healthy eating concerns.对健康饮食的关注会减轻饥饿对放纵性食物选择的影响。
Front Nutr. 2024 Aug 23;11:1377120. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1377120. eCollection 2024.
7
Salivary Alpha-Amylase Mediates the Increase in Hunger Levels in Adolescents with Excess Weight after Viewing Food Images.唾液淀粉酶介导超重青少年观看食物图像后饥饿感水平的增加。
Child Obes. 2020 Jan;16(1):53-58. doi: 10.1089/chi.2019.0133. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
8
The effect of hunger on children's sharing behavior and fairness preferences.饥饿对儿童分享行为和公平偏好的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Apr;192:104786. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104786. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
9
When hunger does (or doesn't) increase unhealthy and healthy food consumption through food wanting: The distinctive role of impulsive approach tendencies toward healthy food.当饥饿通过对食物的渴望增加(或不增加)不健康和健康食品的消费时:对健康食品的冲动趋近倾向的独特作用。
Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.028. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
10
Latina mothers' influences on child appetite regulation.拉丁裔母亲对儿童食欲调节的影响。
Appetite. 2016 Aug 1;103:200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Gambling on an empty stomach: Hunger modulates preferences for learned but not described risks.空腹赌博:饥饿调节对习得但未描述风险的偏好。
Brain Behav. 2023 May;13(5):e2978. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2978. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
2
Hangry in the field: An experience sampling study on the impact of hunger on anger, irritability, and affect.饥饿中的愤怒:一项关于饥饿对愤怒、烦躁和情绪影响的体验抽样研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 6;17(7):e0269629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269629. eCollection 2022.
3
Associations Between Dietary Patterns and Sleep-Related Impairment in a Cohort of Community Physicians: A Cross-sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Hunger enhances consistent economic choices in non-human primates.饥饿增强了非人类灵长类动物一致的经济选择。
Sci Rep. 2017 May 24;7(1):2394. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02417-5.
2
Acute stress alters individual risk taking in a time-dependent manner and leads to anti-social risk.急性应激以时间依赖的方式改变个体的冒险行为,并导致反社会风险。
Eur J Neurosci. 2017 Apr;45(7):877-885. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13395. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
3
Relationship Between Glucocorticoids and Insulin Resistance in Healthy Individuals.健康人群中糖皮质激素与胰岛素抵抗的关系。
一组社区医生的饮食模式与睡眠相关障碍之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2019 Sep 10;15(6):644-652. doi: 10.1177/1559827619871923. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
4
Satiety does not alter the ventral striatum's response to immediate reward in bulimia nervosa.饱足感不会改变神经性贪食症患者腹侧纹状体对即时奖励的反应。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2021 Nov;130(8):862-874. doi: 10.1037/abn0000712.
5
Hunger improves reinforcement-driven but not planned action.饥饿改善了强化驱动但不是计划好的行为。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Dec;21(6):1196-1206. doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00921-w. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Jun 3;22:1887-94. doi: 10.12659/msm.895251.
4
A meta-analysis of blood glucose effects on human decision making.血糖对人类决策影响的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2016 May;142(5):546-67. doi: 10.1037/bul0000035. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
5
Age Differences of Salivary Alpha-Amylase Levels of Basal and Acute Responses to Citric Acid Stimulation Between Chinese Children and Adults.中国儿童与成人唾液α-淀粉酶基础水平及柠檬酸刺激后急性反应的年龄差异
Front Physiol. 2015 Nov 18;6:340. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00340. eCollection 2015.
6
Salivary Composition Is Associated with Liking and Usual Nutrient Intake.唾液成分与喜好及日常营养摄入有关。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 4;10(9):e0137473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137473. eCollection 2015.
7
Psychosocial Stress Increases Salivary Alpha-Amylase Activity Independently from Plasma Noradrenaline Levels.心理社会压力独立于血浆去甲肾上腺素水平增加唾液α-淀粉酶活性。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 6;10(8):e0134561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134561. eCollection 2015.
8
Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake.使用能量和蛋白质摄入的恢复生物标志物对 5 项饮食自我报告工具的验证研究进行汇总分析结果。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Jul 15;180(2):172-88. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu116. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
9
Acute stress affects risk taking but not ambiguity aversion.急性应激会影响冒险行为,但不会影响对模糊性的厌恶。
Front Neurosci. 2014 May 6;8:82. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00082. eCollection 2014.
10
Stress leads to prosocial action in immediate need situations.压力会在紧急需求情况下引发亲社会行为。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jan 22;8:5. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00005. eCollection 2014.