Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell St, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 2W6.
Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 5;79(4):17r11839. doi: 10.4088/JCP.17r11839.
To systematically review studies examining the longitudinal associations between cannabis use and symptomatic outcomes among individuals with an anxiety or mood disorder at baseline.
A search of the literature up to May 2017 was conducted using several databases. Search terms related to the exposure (ie, cannabis) and outcome (ie, symptoms) variables of interest. There were no search restrictions.
In total, 10,191 citations were screened. Key inclusion criteria related to (1) cohort-based longitudinal study design using adults who met criteria for a mood or anxiety disorder at baseline, (2) an independent variable focusing on at least baseline cannabis use, and (3) a dependent variable focusing on the symptomatic course and/or outcomes in anxiety and mood disorders (AMD).
We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Methodological characteristics and key findings were extracted from each study, and quality assessments were conducted for each study.
Twelve studies (with a total of 11,959 individuals) met inclusion criteria related to posttraumatic stress disorder (n = 4), panic disorder (n = 1), bipolar disorder (n = 5), and depressive disorder (n = 2). Across 11 studies, "recent" cannabis use (ie, any/greater frequency of use during the last 6 months) was associated with higher symptomatic levels over time relative to comparison groups (ie, no/lesser frequency of use). Ten of these studies further suggested that cannabis use was associated with less symptomatic improvement from treatment (eg, medication, psychotherapy for AMD).
Recent cannabis use was associated with negative long-term symptomatic and treatment outcomes across AMD. The findings should be interpreted with caution, considering the observational designs across studies and the biases associated with the samples (eg, inpatients) and sources of cannabis consumed (ie, unregulated sources). Nonetheless, clinicians can use the insight gained to inform their own and their patients' knowledge concerning potential risks of cannabis with regard to symptoms of AMD.
系统回顾研究,以考察基线时有焦虑或心境障碍的个体中,大麻使用与症状结果之间的纵向关联。
使用多个数据库,对文献进行了截至 2017 年 5 月的检索。检索术语与感兴趣的暴露(即大麻)和结局(即症状)变量有关。没有搜索限制。
共筛选了 10191 条引文。主要纳入标准涉及:(1)基于队列的纵向研究设计,纳入基线时符合心境或焦虑障碍标准的成年人;(2)重点关注至少基线时大麻使用的自变量;(3)重点关注焦虑和心境障碍(AMD)症状过程和/或结局的因变量。
我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南。从每项研究中提取方法学特征和主要发现,并对每项研究进行质量评估。
12 项研究(共涉及 11959 人)符合 PTSD(n=4)、惊恐障碍(n=1)、双相障碍(n=5)和抑郁障碍(n=2)的纳入标准。在 11 项研究中,“近期”大麻使用(即过去 6 个月内使用的任何/更高频率)与随时间推移更高的症状水平相关,与对照组(即使用的任何/更低频率)相比。其中 10 项研究进一步表明,大麻使用与从治疗中获得的症状改善程度较低相关(例如,用于 AMD 的药物治疗、心理治疗)。
近期大麻使用与 AMD 的负面长期症状和治疗结果相关。考虑到研究中的观察性设计以及样本(例如,住院患者)和消耗大麻的来源(例如,不受监管的来源)相关的偏倚,应谨慎解释这些发现。尽管如此,临床医生可以利用所获得的知识,告知自己和患者有关大麻与 AMD 症状相关的潜在风险的知识。