• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

猜测对系数α及信度影响的调查

An Investigation of the Impact of Guessing on Coefficient α and Reliability.

作者信息

Paek Insu

机构信息

Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Jun;39(4):264-277. doi: 10.1177/0146621614559516. Epub 2014 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1177/0146621614559516
PMID:29881007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5978545/
Abstract

Guessing is known to influence the test reliability of multiple-choice tests. Although there are many studies that have examined the impact of guessing, they used rather restrictive assumptions (e.g., parallel test assumptions, homogeneous inter-item correlations, homogeneous item difficulty, and homogeneous guessing levels across items) to evaluate the relation between guessing and test reliability. Based on the item response theory (IRT) framework, this study investigated the extent of the impact of guessing on reliability under more realistic conditions where item difficulty, item discrimination, and guessing levels actually vary across items with three different test lengths (TL). By accommodating multiple item characteristics simultaneously, this study also focused on examining interaction effects between guessing and other variables entered in the simulation to be more realistic. The simulation of the more realistic conditions and calculations of reliability and classical test theory (CTT) item statistics were facilitated by expressing CTT item statistics, coefficient α, and reliability in terms of IRT model parameters. In addition to the general negative impact of guessing on reliability, results showed interaction effects between TL and guessing and between guessing and test difficulty.

摘要

众所周知,猜测会影响多项选择题测试的可靠性。尽管有许多研究考察了猜测的影响,但它们使用的假设相当严格(例如,平行测试假设、项目间相关性均匀、项目难度均匀以及各项目猜测水平均匀)来评估猜测与测试可靠性之间的关系。基于项目反应理论(IRT)框架,本研究调查了在更现实的条件下,猜测对可靠性的影响程度,在这些条件下,项目难度、项目区分度和猜测水平实际上会因三种不同的测试长度(TL)而在各项目间有所不同。通过同时考虑多个项目特征,本研究还专注于检验猜测与模拟中输入的其他变量之间的交互作用,以使结果更符合实际。通过用IRT模型参数来表示经典测试理论(CTT)项目统计量(α)系数和可靠性,便于对更现实的条件进行模拟以及计算可靠性和CTT项目统计量。除了猜测对可靠性的一般负面影响外,结果还显示了测试长度与猜测之间以及猜测与测试难度之间的交互作用。

相似文献

1
An Investigation of the Impact of Guessing on Coefficient α and Reliability.猜测对系数α及信度影响的调查
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Jun;39(4):264-277. doi: 10.1177/0146621614559516. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
2
Item response theory in high-stakes pharmacy assessments.项目反应理论在高风险药学评估中的应用。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022 Sep;14(9):1206-1214. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2022.07.023. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
3
[The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].[法语使用者病前智力水平的评估]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):31-43. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82370-x.
4
Relationships Among Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory Frameworks via Factor Analytic Models.通过因子分析模型探讨经典测试理论与项目反应理论框架之间的关系。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Jun;75(3):389-405. doi: 10.1177/0013164414559071. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
5
Consequences of Ignoring Guessing Effects on Measurement Invariance Analysis.忽略猜测效应在测量不变性分析中的后果。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;45(4):283-296. doi: 10.1177/01466216211013915. Epub 2021 May 17.
6
Refinement and Evaluation of a Chinese and Western Medication Adherence Scale for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Item Response Theory Analyses.慢性肾脏病患者中西药用药依从性量表的优化与评价:项目反应理论分析
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Nov 18;14:2243-2252. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S269255. eCollection 2020.
7
Evaluating the Impact of Guessing and Its Interactions With Other Test Characteristics on Confidence Interval Procedures for Coefficient Alpha.评估猜测的影响及其与其他测试特征的相互作用对系数α的置信区间程序的影响。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Apr;76(2):205-230. doi: 10.1177/0013164415588133. Epub 2015 May 24.
8
Response pattern of depressive symptoms among college students: What lies behind items of the Beck Depression Inventory-II?大学生抑郁症状的反应模式:贝克抑郁量表二的项目背后隐藏着什么?
J Affect Disord. 2018 Jul;234:124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.064. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
9
The relationship between classical item characteristics and item response time on computer-based testing.基于计算机测试中经典项目特征与项目反应时间之间的关系。
Korean J Med Educ. 2019 Mar;31(1):1-9. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2019.113. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
10
Methodological issues regarding power of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT)-based approaches for the comparison of patient-reported outcomes in two groups of patients--a simulation study.关于经典测量理论(CTT)和项目反应理论(IRT)方法在两组患者间比较患者报告结局的功效的方法学问题——一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Mar 25;10:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-24.

引用本文的文献

1
The Adaptation of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-5th Edition (WISC-V) for Indonesia: A Pilot Study.《韦氏儿童智力量表第五版(WISC-V)在印度尼西亚的适应性:一项试点研究》
J Intell. 2025 Jun 24;13(7):76. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13070076.
2
Better climate action through the right knowledge? Development and validation of an item-response-theory scale measuring climate effectiveness knowledge.通过正确的知识实现更好的气候行动?开发并验证一个测量气候有效性知识的项目反应理论量表。
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 14;15:1347407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1347407. eCollection 2024.
3
Patient Reported Traditional Chinese Medicine Spleen Deficiency Syndrome (TCM-SDS) Scale for Colorectal Cancer: Development and Validation in China.中文版结直肠癌患者报告的中医脾虚证量表(TCM-SDS):在中国的研制与验证。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2021 Jan-Dec;20:15347354211020105. doi: 10.1177/15347354211020105.
4
Evaluating the Impact of Guessing and Its Interactions With Other Test Characteristics on Confidence Interval Procedures for Coefficient Alpha.评估猜测的影响及其与其他测试特征的相互作用对系数α的置信区间程序的影响。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Apr;76(2):205-230. doi: 10.1177/0013164415588133. Epub 2015 May 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements.α系数与复合测量的可靠性
Psychometrika. 1967 Mar;32(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/BF02289400.